[benellis58]

At least we got a fairly average score of 51.79 % for going down "only" three tricks in 4C, but what a MAGNIFICENTLY STUPID bid of 3D North made...red against white (!)...on his flattish pile of trash. Card after card, bid after bid, these GIBBO bozos constantly prove that they are the GARBAGE of the bridge world and easily among the absolutely worst "bridge players" of all time. They stink.

https://www.bridgeba...CS6%7Cmc%7C7%7C

[benellis58]

I'm not impressed by North's foolish, likely anti-positional 2NT bid with 4-4 in the minors and no true stopper in either major, but fortunately we made the contract, thanks in no small part to a typically wretched "defence" by the hopeless GIBBO robots sitting East-West.

East leads a normal heart. West wins his ace and actually returns the suit! Bravo! Contact the press AGAIN, because these ignorant all-time losers usually HATE to return "partner's" suit.

But let's not overpraise the simpleton sitting West. He returns a heart, fine, but he knows SO little about bridge that he can't even return the correct heart. The dumb bozo plays the 5 instead of the 2, because these imbeciles are too unfailingly stupid to differentiate between spot cards.

At trick two, declarer North perforce wins dummy South's now-stiff heart king. He then calls for dummy's diamond 2. West plays the 8 (the EIGHT, please note, NOT the SEVEN!) from his holding of J87. This WINS the trick, as declarer North follows with the 3 from his unexposed AK43 and East plays the 6.

West of course now plays a third round of hearts and...HOLD IT right there! Stop the bus! Because...West does NOT make the OBVIOUS play of a third round of hearts (a play that even a raw beginner would know to make!). The INCREDIBLY stupid M.O.R.O.N. plays a...DIAMOND! Typically, he does NOT play the suit his "partner" led, the suit that HE himself continued, because he MUCH prefers to play the suit that DECLARER just played! Never mind just BRIDGE - I have never seen the STAGGERING stupidity CONSTANTLY exhibited by these GIBBO dweebs ANYWHERE!

Not surprisingly, this is yet ANOTHER total ZERO that these GIBBO jackasses can add to their world-famous, UNTOUCHABLE collection of lifetime failures.

https://www.bridgeba...SK%7Cpc%7CS7%7C

[benellis58]

East-West are ice cold for ELEVEN tricks in spades, but neither ever bids, and they SELL OUT to South's 1NT opening bid.

Just LOOK at East's hand: K107643, A, A7, J874! He's in passout seat, NOBODY VUL, and he can't scrape up a bid????!!!

EVERYTHING these repugnant, sickening GIBBO clowns do PROVES that they are among the absolutely WORST "bridge players" EVER!

https://www.bridgeba...D9%7Cpc%7CDQ%7C

[benellis58]

Typically stupid OVERBID of 3NT by the GIBBO piece of dirt in the West. The M.O.R.O.N. doesn't even follow his own GIB definition, which (in typically pathetic GIB fashion) states that 3NT shows "13-20 HCP". 13 to...excuse me while I pause five minutes to laugh uproariously...TWENTY? The dimwit has...ELEVEN!

https://www.bridgeba...CHT%7Cmc%7C7%7C

[benellis58]

By now, I think everyone knows that GIB definitions are pure, unadulterated drivel of the worst sort. They are poorly worded. They often contain needless, insulting nonsense such as "invitational to 3NT game", "minor-suit opening", "one over one", "opener rebids suit".and other TOTALLY useless bilge of that type, while...at the same time (!), they often FAIL to describe the KEY point of a bid! They are often incorrect, redundant, incomplete, and illogical. In short, they are drivel.

But I think that in a game I played yesterday, I saw the crème de la crème (!) of GIB drivel, and here it is:

North's 4D is defined as...wait for it...drum roll, please..."Splinter - 4+ diamonds (!!!!!!!!!!!); 10-12 HCP; forcing to 5D"!


So, Mr. GIB, just to make sure I understand, North is SPLINTERING in DIAMONDS, meaning that he is showing SHORTNESS in DIAMONDS, either a VOID or a SINGLETON in DIAMONDS...yet IMMEDIATELY after that (yes, IMMEDIATELY!)...in the SAME definition, he is telling us that he has at LEAST ...FOUR diamonds, and possibly as many as THIRTEEN (theoretically, anyway) since the typically lazy "4+" literally means at least four, with no defined upper limit.

Just stop to consider, dear readers, that someone actually took the time to write this obviously completely contradictory piece of GARBAGE! And, dear readers, please also stop to consider that this OBVIOUS huge error has NEVER been corrected! That tells you all you need to know about how "good" GIB/GIBBO is, and about how "diligent" the proofreading, verification, and upkeep have been.

I think that this definition ALONE...all by itself...shows why I have so often stated that not only are the GIB definitions the absolutely worst that I have EVER seen in regards to bridge, but that they are also the absolutely worst definitions I have ever seen ANYWHERE in ANY realm. I have never seen such complete sloppiness and TOTAL lack of care for ANY definition ANYWHERE else.

GIB/GIBBO is an absolute joke and a complete travesty. It is the worst of the worst, the lowest of the low. GIB/GIBBO rots.

I was pleasantly surprised to see that I actually scored 60 % (!) on this board, but on reflection, I said, "Well, why not? Every other human also has to endure the same nonsense from GIB/GIBBO that I do, so they all also saw this this ridiculous drivel."

https://www.bridgeba...SQ%7Cmc%7C10%7C