Benellis58 GIB bashing on repeat Groundhog Day
#2181
Posted 2026-July-15, 22:27
Answer: Because he's not just ANY stinking piece of trash, he's a GIBBO stinking piece of trash - the worst and most clueless of all.
https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/558htb2a
#2182
Posted 2026-July-15, 22:36
Don't ask ME, because if it ever gets to the point where I actually start to "think" like a stinking piece of trash GIBBO robot, I'll immediately give up bridge forever - just like these terminally clueless GIBBO dolts should have done ages ago.
https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/y3d77aar
#2183
Posted 2026-July-15, 22:53
"You need to play a lot of stuff these days just to deal with the stuff your opponents are playing" DBurn
#2184
Posted 2026-July-15, 23:14
https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/2p8jdd4m
#2185
Posted 2026-July-15, 23:51
https://www.bridgeba...-of-rkcb-reply/
#2186
Posted Yesterday, 05:06
Over North's 2C, 2NT by South would show "11-14 HCP", which is fine, but 3NT would show "13-20 HCP", which is a ridiculously broad range of EIGHT points. It's also redundant, contradictory, and inconsistent, because TWO NT (as previously indicated) shows 11-14, so why are 13 and 14 also included for 3NT? And if he had 15-17, wouldn't he have opened 1NT? And with 20, wouldn't he have opened 2NT? So instead of the mindless hogwash and ridiculous range given for a 3NT bid by South, why doesn't GIB define things this SIMPLE, NORMAL, EASY, STRAIGHTFORWARD way: Over North's 2C, 2NT by South shows 11-14. With 15-17, South would have opened 1NT and with 20 (or 21) he would have opened 2NT, so - BINGO - THREE NT over North's 2C shows 18-19. But that SIMPLE solution is obviously WAY too difficult for GIB, so we're left with their nonsensically wide, unworkable range of "13-20", which gives North NO useful information.
The closest thing to a descriptive bid by South in the reprehensible GIBBO system is (gaah!) 2S, defined by GIB as "New suit" (because of course GIB, which doesn't tell us USEFUL stuff, feels it MUST (pointlessly!) inform us that 2S is a "new suit"! After this typically pathetic beginning, the GIB definition of 2S continues "3+ diamonds; 4+ spades; 21- HCP; 16-22 total points; forcing to 3NT". As woeful as this definition is (and it is REALLY woeful, as ONLY a GIB definition can be), it is at least an accurate (if largely uninformative!) description of South's hand, so he bids 2S as the least of evils in their miserable system.
North now makes one of his favourite (and typically I.D.I.O.T.I.C.) bids by leaping FOUR levels, all the way to 6NT. This is defined by GIB as "19-21 HCP; biddable clubs". Yes, thank you, GIB: I would HOPE the clubs are biddable, since at his previous call, North...BID THEM!
South's elementary school, perhaps unlike GIB's, actually...taught arithmetic (!), so South puts that skill to use.
"Hmm," he says, "I, South, have 19 HCP myself, and my GIBBO 'partner' has just PROMISED me 19-21. If he has 21, we will have a combined partnership total of ALL 40 POINTS IN THE DECK. Even if he has the MINIMUM he PROMISED - 19 - we will have a combined total of 38 HCP. so quite OBVIOUSLY I should raise his 6NT call to 7NT."
Thus, South bids 7NT. West and North pass, and East - who will be on lead - doubles. South IMMEDIATELY thinks "That piece of GIBBO trash in the North has done it AGAIN!" South is CONFIDENT that the doubled grand will IMMEDIATELY go down because East WILL cash an ace that it is mathematically IMPOSSIBLE for him to hold on this auction.
South, of course, is correct. East cashes his diamond ace and declarer then claims down one. The INCREDIBLY stupid GIBBO M.O.R.O.N. in the North has "PROMISED" 19-21 HCP despite holding ONLY (!!!) FIFTEEN - six fewer than his potential maximum, and much more importantly - a full FOUR (!!!) fewer than his "promised" MINIMUM!
No bridge player is perfect. Even the best make mistakes. But there are mistakes, and then there are MISTAKES! THIS insane GIBBO 6NT call is not just some random, run of the mill error - it is a CONSCIOUS decision to GROSSLY distort his values to his "partner" after wasting FOUR levels of bidding with his ridiculous jump. This is the KING of mistakes. AND...
not only does it obviously cause a bad result on THIS board, but it TOTALLY destroys ALL partnership trust and confidence forever. Consider: What happens if tomorrow, for example, South picks up ANOTHER hand with 19 HCP and the uninterrupted NS auction goes exactly as this one did for the first four calls: 1D by South, 2C by North, 2S by South, 6NT by North? What should South now do? He should do exactly what South did here: He should raise to 7NT, because that was and is the CORRECT bid, based on basic, simple elementary school arithmetic. But maybe South will say, "Oh no, that fleabrained GIBBO imbecile in the North is probably doing what he so stupidly did yesterday - PRETENDING to have 19-21 HCP when he actually has only 15, total jackass that he is." And maybe South will then PASS 6NT...and maybe THIS time North will actually HAVE the 19-21 points he's promising. The point is that South will NEVER know whether or not to trust the braindead GIBBO lummox, because the lummox has PROVEN that he CANNOT be trusted and that his bids are just random noise.
GIB/GIBBO is by FAR the worst "bridge player" I have EVER encountered. It is not "just" bad. It is astoundingly, breathtakingly bad, and it is a pox on bridge.
https://www.bridgeba...DA%7Cmc%7C12%7C
#2187
Posted Yesterday, 05:34
Over North's 3H, 3S by South would NOT be a cuebid. It would be "5+ clubs; 4+ diamonds; 3+ spades;..." plus some typically vague, wide-ranging nonsense about HCP and total points. Similarly (and similarly stupidly), 4C would NOT be a cuebid. It would be "4+ hearts; twice rebiddable clubs;..." plus (again) some typically vague, wide-ranging, USELESS nonsense about HCP and total points. There should be a way to CUEBID!
HANDCUFFED by the outstandingly hopeless, inefficient GIBBO system, South bids Blackwood - quite obviously inferior to cuebidding, but in GIBBO's sick, twisted Bizarro World, South can't cuebid!
Maybe South should, as another Forum poster suggested, "stop playing with GIBBO, because no one is forcing him to log on and play with a robot." But South LIKES playing the robot games DESPITE the wretchedness of GIBBO, so he will continue playing them...like many, many other players who also have contempt for GIBBO but will continue playing because they enjoy the games anyway. However, there have been - and will continue to be - a certain number of BBO members who will say "enough is enough" and abandon BBO even though they would have stayed had the robots been better.
A prime rule of business is "Keep the customer satisfied".
https://www.bridgeba...C7%7Cmc%7C12%7C
#2188
Posted Yesterday, 05:52
NS scored 100 % on this board.
https://www.bridgeba...CH6%7Cmc%7C9%7C
#2189
Posted Yesterday, 06:22
https://www.bridgeba...DJ%7Cmc%7C13%7C
#2190
Posted Yesterday, 09:26
True, OMAR. If they wanted to compete, they would have been wiser to contract for 3S, especially since even they should be aware of how miserable they are at "defence". They should watch "Magnum Force" and take note of Clint Eastwood's line (as Harry Callahan) "A man's got to know his limitations".
But look at the bright side, OMAR. At least, via their GIB definitions, they were able to alert the world to the following three Earth-shattering pieces of vital information that probably NO ONE would EVER have been able to otherwise figure out by themselves, namely that:
1C is a "Minor-suit opening". Wow! I mean, like WOW, man, how does GIB know that? I'm SO impressed that I'm remembering John Sebastian's actions at Woodstock in 1969! Like, WOW, man! And...
1D is a "One-level overcall". TRULY informative! And SO crucial to our understanding of the bid! Thank you, thank you, THANK you, GIB, for telling us! A ONE-level overcall, you say! Truly inspirational!
1H is a "Free bid". Please, please slow down, GIB! This REALLY important and REALLY hitherto unknown information is SO very difficult for us mere humans to understand and process! How were you EVER able to figure out these SUPER complex concepts ...and then REMEMBER them, to boot? Truly, TRULY impressive, GIB! Well DONE!
Golly! The GENIUS that it took to realize even ONE of those three things! I'm sure that no mere human would ever have been aware of ANY of them without your valuable statements in those TRULY - dare I say it - beautiful and breathtaking definitions!
https://www.bridgeba...CHQ%7Cmc%7C9%7C
#2191
Posted Today, 10:20
But to be fair to the GIBBO ignoramus in the East, two of his fellow GIBBO M.O.R.O.N.S. were even more (!) stupid on the hand. For the details, please read the two posts (2192 and 2193) immediately following this one. The total ignorance of these pathetic GIBBO clowns knows NO boundaries. They are the worst ever!
https://www.bridgeba...HQ%7Cmc%7C13%7C
#2192
Posted Today, 10:32
At this table, North-South gravely erred by bidding SEVEN spades despite missing a cashable ace of diamonds. However, they were wise enough to have this bidding mistake against two of the worst "bridge players" of all time. Yes, of COURSE I'm talking about hideous, repulsive, nauseating GIBBO robots.
Here, against a GRAND SLAM, the absolutely stunning M.O.R.O.N. in the East also FAILED to lead his diamond ace and made the same MONUMENTALLY stupid lead of a trump. Against a GRAND (!), of course, this lead was even MORE stupid than the one Donald J. Dumbo had made against me in my "mere" small slam.
And, to boot, based on the auction in this "impossible" grand, ANY real BRIDGE PLAYER would have KNOWN that his ace was cashing.
There are not enough derogatory words in the entire English language to even begin to describe how sickeningly bad the contemptible GIBBO robots are at bridge.
https://www.bridgeba...HQ%7Cmc%7C13%7C
#2193
Posted Today, 10:50
Here too, the NS pair gravely erred by bidding a grand despite missing the cashable ace of diamonds. At this table, the auction was even further off the mark, because not only did they bid an "impossible" grand (missing an ace), but they bid it in CLUBS (!)...a lower-scoring strain than spades, but more importantly a SEVEN-card fit (!) rather than the NINE-card fit they had in spades!
Not to worry, though, because like the pair in post 2192, they were wise enough (?) and LUCKY enough to have their bidding disaster against two INCOMPARABLY stupid GIBBO robots so of COURSE the addlepated dweeb in the East ALSO - like his M.O.R.O.N.I.C. counterparts, led a trump! THIS time, of course, a "trump" was a club rather than a spade. Note that HERE the MANIACAL trump lead was perhaps even MORE costly than the braindead ones from posts 2191 and 2192, because HERE not ONLY did the imbecile fail to take the SETTING TRICK with his opening lead, but he ALSO resolved any possible trump guess that declarer might have, since 7C was only a SEVEN-card fit and declarer was missing SIX clubs to the JACK.
How can ANYONE...EVER defend the bridge "ability" of these utterly hopeless, contemptible GIBBO pieces of trash? Even more interestingly, how on EARTH is it that some people STILL have the laughable audacity to say that these GIBBO bozos are "better than most human players"?
https://www.bridgeba...DJ%7Cpc%7CD7%7C
#2194
Posted Today, 11:28
The "defence" is the pitiful effort that we always expect from these GIBBO deplorables. Among other things, note that the droke in the East cannot even manage to play the correct heart on either of the first two heart plays.
https://www.bridgeba...CCT%7Cmc%7C9%7C
#2195
Posted Today, 11:31
https://www.bridgeba...S8%7Cpc%7CCJ%7C

Help
