game?
#1 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-August-18, 00:31
Kx ATxxx xxxx xx
1D on your left, 1S by pard, pass, you pass, 2C on left, p p 2H by you p 3H by pard p ?
Undiscussed whether 2H over 1S is NF or F.
Q1) Do you bid game or pass? How close is it?
Q2) Do you agree with your previous bidding?
#2
Posted 2008-August-18, 01:33
My two honours must be very welcome to him.
I would like a to have singleton club though.
A2. I really like the previous bidding.
The hand is not good enough for immediate action, but it got a second chance.
I suppose partner holds a good hand, but not good enough to start with double and then bid spades.
Finding your own mistakes is more productive than looking for partner's. It improves your game and is good for your soul. (Nige1)
#3
Posted 2008-August-18, 01:44
#4
Posted 2008-August-18, 03:31
The auction so far is fine.
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"Hysterical Raisins again - this time on the World stage, not just the ACBL" mycroft
#5
Posted 2008-August-18, 03:45
However, if partner had 4 hearts and a pretty good hand why didnt he bid 2H himself over 2C? I dont think that would have to show 5-5 (am I wrong?) If partner doesnt have 4 hearts then I just have trouble seeing us get 10 tricks given the minor suit situation and the likely bad major suit breaks.
#6
Posted 2008-August-18, 06:27
Partner's lack of any other call as a game try convinces me.
-P.J. Painter.
#7
Posted 2008-August-18, 07:05
2) Under the stated conditions, passing 1♠ has to be the sensible thing to do.
I like to play 2♥ non-forcing, and I would bid 2♥ with that agreement.
Then, it would be easy to decline any invitations, and perhaps easier for partner - with heart support - to decide whether to raise to game or to invite.
#8
Posted 2008-August-18, 08:43
#10
Posted 2008-August-18, 09:24
#11
Posted 2008-August-18, 09:24
I picture partner for about the playing strength of AQxxx Kxx xx AQx. With AQxxx Kxxx x Axx I think that partner would have bid game instead of inviting. Given the opposition bidding it is not clear if you want to be in game opposite that first hand, hearts are quite likely to be 1-4. And I made all of partner's points work, is that fair? I guess to pass, I would bid game when red or if I had AJxxx of hearts instead.
Pass.
- hrothgar
#12
Posted 2008-August-18, 09:41
kenrexford, on Aug 18 2008, 07:27 AM, said:
Partner's lack of any other call as a game try convinces me.
I just know I'm going to regret this...but what do you mean by this comment?
#13
Posted 2008-August-18, 10:40
#14
Posted 2008-August-18, 10:48
jdonn, on Aug 18 2008, 10:41 AM, said:
kenrexford, on Aug 18 2008, 07:27 AM, said:
Partner's lack of any other call as a game try convinces me.
I just know I'm going to regret this...but what do you mean by this comment?
I believe he means that both 3♣ and 3♦ would be cue bids in support of hearts, and that he feels that 3♥ says that he doesn't need help in the minors. Since all of our points are in the majors, what we have must be what he's looking for.
#15
Posted 2008-August-18, 12:48
Playing transfer advances, I'd have bid 2♦ over 1♠. Without that treatment, I just might have tried 1NT, but pass is OK.
Harald
#16
Posted 2008-August-18, 17:48
As for the bidding, I approve of it (given the agreements stated), which probably means that it's flawed. Sorry.
#17
Posted 2008-August-18, 20:33
Values
tol for spades
5 in the unbid suit.
Once i bid 2H wich is the bid i would have made with 6H to the Q and nothing else i have so much extras that stopping short of game is inconceivable.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#18
Posted 2008-August-18, 20:47
#19
Posted 2008-August-18, 22:53
Just noted that my answer is identical to Han's...one of us will be disappointed
#20
Posted 2008-August-19, 12:09
mikeh, on Aug 18 2008, 11:53 PM, said:
On the contrary Mike. I flew to the Netherlands yesterday (today? I'm not sure) and I really wanted to log on now to see if anybody agreed with me. I'm glad you do!
- hrothgar

Help
