BBO Discussion Forums: game? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

game?

#21 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2008-August-19, 12:24

I'll simplify. I didn't bid game, Justin thinks I'm nuts, I think partner underbid like my grandma (AQ9xx xxxx Ax Ax), Justin thinks lots of example hands make game, I think pretty much any example hand that makes game was worth a game bid over 2. I did win the gentleman's bet though, he thought 100% would bid game hehe.

There weren't really example hands put forward for partner shown in this thread, anyone? I could hardly find any that were not decent games opposite, say, xx Axxxxx xx xxx, meaning (to me) that they were game bids over 2 (such as AQxxx Kxx xx AQx, how could this not bid game over 2, think of what partner is showing! Say opposite xx ATxxxx xxx xx (the opponents can't really have 9 diamonds.))
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#22 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,520
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-August-19, 12:36

jdonn, on Aug 19 2008, 12:24 PM, said:

There weren't really example hands put forward for partner shown in this thread, anyone? I could hardly find any that were not decent games opposite, say, xx Axxxxx xx xxx, meaning (to me) that they were game bids over 2 (such as AQxxx Kxx xx AQx, how could this not bid game over 2, think of what partner is showing! Say opposite xx ATxxxx xxx xx (the opponents can't really have 9 diamonds.))

Heh. I was going to post that this hand, AQxxx Kxx xx AQx, looks rather minimum for 3 ;). Would you really be surprised to go down one in 3 opposite x QJ9xxx xxx xxx?

Anyway, I leave the "game is good except there may well be a 4-1 break" reasoning to the best bidder in the world (and of course notorious underbidders), as LHO could be 2254 or 1255 etc.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#23 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2008-August-19, 12:39

cherdano, on Aug 19 2008, 01:36 PM, said:

jdonn, on Aug 19 2008, 12:24 PM, said:

There weren't really example hands put forward for partner shown in this thread, anyone? I could hardly find any that were not decent games opposite, say, xx Axxxxx xx xxx, meaning (to me) that they were game bids over 2 (such as AQxxx Kxx xx AQx, how could this not bid game over 2, think of what partner is showing! Say opposite xx ATxxxx xxx xx (the opponents can't really have 9 diamonds.))

Heh. I was going to post that this hand, AQxxx Kxx xx AQx, looks rather minimum for 3 ;). Would you really be surprised to go down one in 3 opposite x QJ9xxx xxx xxx?

Anyway, I leave the "game is good except there may well be a 4-1 break" reasoning to the best bidder in the world (and of course notorious underbidders), as LHO could be 2254 or 1255 etc.

Well are we so sure QJxxxx and out (or even my example?) should be balancing?
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#24 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,520
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-August-19, 12:42

I don't know whether it should, but I know I would ;)
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#25 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2008-August-19, 16:12

jdonn, on Aug 18 2008, 10:41 AM, said:

kenrexford, on Aug 18 2008, 07:27 AM, said:

Game.  Not close.  OK with previous bidding.

Partner's lack of any other call as a game try convinces me.

I just know I'm going to regret this...but what do you mean by this comment?

If partner had bid anything but pass or 2 over 2, it is a game try in hearts. Has to be. Thus, 2NT, 3, 3, and 3 are all GT raises.

I would expect minor calls by partner to be shortness bids.

I would also expect 2NT, because it allows me to bid a minor at the three-level on route to 3, to express interest of some variety in some three-level call. Whether that call should be a shortness call or a feature, I'm not sure. However, I have neither.

Because partner picked 3, a bid that deprives me of the ability to make a three-level responsive game try back, he must be interested in game without any interest in hearing any sort of minor call. As I have no ability to make a minor call, I have no wasted value outside.

Hence, I think my hand fits well with how partner has elected to invite.

[EDIT: Just saw that jtfanclub answered for me very well.]
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#26 User is offline   benlessard 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,465
  • Joined: 2006-January-07
  • Location:Montreal Canada
  • Interests:All games. i really mean all of them.

Posted 2008-August-20, 19:58

Quote

I'll simplify. I didn't bid game, Justin thinks I'm nuts, I think partner underbid like my grandma (AQ9xx xxxx Ax Ax),
We see that youve herited your grandma "chicken genes". Passing 3H is gross. Not close at all.

2H instead of X is a weak bid. 2H can show crap. No expert will sell out at 2C with Qxxxxx in H.
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
0

#27 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2008-August-20, 20:43

cherdano, on Aug 19 2008, 10:36 AM, said:

jdonn, on Aug 19 2008, 12:24 PM, said:

There weren't really example hands put forward for partner shown in this thread, anyone? I could hardly find any that were not decent games opposite, say, xx Axxxxx xx xxx, meaning (to me) that they were game bids over 2 (such as AQxxx Kxx xx AQx, how could this not bid game over 2, think of what partner is showing! Say opposite xx ATxxxx xxx xx (the opponents can't really have 9 diamonds.))

Heh. I was going to post that this hand, AQxxx Kxx xx AQx, looks rather minimum for 3 (snip)

As I said before, I rather doubt pard passes 2 with a hand like this. I think the 5422 OP is a double as well.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#28 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2008-August-20, 20:56

pclayton, on Aug 20 2008, 09:43 PM, said:

cherdano, on Aug 19 2008, 10:36 AM, said:

jdonn, on Aug 19 2008, 12:24 PM, said:

There weren't really example hands put forward for partner shown in this thread, anyone? I could hardly find any that were not decent games opposite, say, xx Axxxxx xx xxx, meaning (to me) that they were game bids over 2 (such as AQxxx Kxx xx AQx, how could this not bid game over 2, think of what partner is showing! Say opposite xx ATxxxx xxx xx (the opponents can't really have 9 diamonds.))

Heh. I was going to post that this hand, AQxxx Kxx xx AQx, looks rather minimum for 3 (snip)

As I said before, I rather doubt pard passes 2 with a hand like this. I think the 5422 OP is a double as well.

What is partner supposed to bid over 2C with 5323? That is an obvious pass because...well...there is no bid and no reason to bid. Even with most 5422s there is a huge risk that there is a trap pass behind you, and you are generally outgunned when partner can't bid over your 1S, and when you are not partner can balance anyways. It is a really dangerous spot to come in.
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users