Reverse Flannery disaster What is the worst bid?
#1
Posted 2007-November-27, 21:40
Pard opened in 1st position with 1♦. Our partnership has just agreed to play reverse flannery so this was the perfect hand to start with this toy and I responded 2♥.
LHO overcalled 2♠ (no alert!) regardless of my self alert telling the opps I've got 5♠ and 4♥. Partner doubled, RHO bid 3!c. I passed, of course. LHO passed and partner doubled again. What should I bid now?
Pard RHO You LHO
1♦ Pass 2♥ 2♠
X 3♣ Pass Pass
X Pass ?
l was not optimistic of setting the contract so I retreated to 3♦. Partner bid 3♠. I was not sure about the meaning of this bid and finally decided that opp may psyche the 2♠ or just forgot to alert his cue bid. After some moment of agony, I finally passed. The whole auction was:
Pard RHO You LHO
1♦ Pass 2♥ 2♠
X 3♣ Pass Pass
X Pass 3♦ Pass
3♠ All pass
My pd has become declarer in the miserable 3♠ contract with his monster hand Q AK KQJTx KQ8xx. LHO did have 7♠ and the contract swiftly went down 3 tricks.
What is the worst bid of the whole auction? My correction to 3♦ or the final pass or ...?
#3
Posted 2007-November-27, 22:56
Alert convention police misuse, overuse of fine convention.
I play reverse flannery is around 8-11 or 7+-11
#4
Posted 2007-November-27, 23:19
I don't know, but when you told your story, stick to it.. partner is the boss (captain).
#5
Posted 2007-November-27, 23:36
#6
Posted 2007-November-28, 00:56
George Carlin
#7
Posted 2007-November-28, 02:04
Partner should have passed in 3♦ too
#8
Posted 2007-November-28, 02:31
the answer is simple: Removing the double.
You said, you have the perfect hand, for the bid,
i.e. you were able to describe your hand very
narrowly to partner.
So the question is, why did you take over the
role of the captain?
The only explanation is, that you did not believe
partner, and this is far worse than anything you
can do, because your action tell partner, that he
is an idiot.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#9
Posted 2007-November-28, 04:52
After the X 3S has to be natural.
1- worst bid = 3S
2nd place = pulling the X
if your 2H show (6-9) or at least 6 pts. Then i give a 3rd place to 2H.
If 2H show 4 to something then 2 H is the systemic bid.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#10
Posted 2007-November-28, 05:22
#11
Posted 2007-November-28, 05:44
#12
Posted 2007-November-28, 06:06
#14
Posted 2007-November-28, 08:06
The 2♥ bid was also wrong because of the diamond support. I would respond 1♠ on this hand so we can play in 2♦ if partner rebids a minor.
The weak reverse flannery response should only be used when opener could rebid a NF 2m and you would want to bid a NF 2♥. This isn't the case here.
#15
Posted 2007-November-28, 09:14
Once the opps get involved, he has to decide, game in a minor or try to punish the opps? Since you are white and they are red, the double seems likely, but at what level? Based on the auction, I like your bid of 3♦, as it says that you have a ♦ fragment. Once he hears this, he knows that a ♦ game is likely and he should bid it. I doubt the opps would go further. When you know what to do, just do it and take the pressure off pard.
btw your comment "Partner bid 3♠. I was not sure about the meaning of this bid" if not sure then it is forcing
So, the pass of 3♠ is the worst bid as it was ambiguous to you but I took it in the context as asking about a ♠ stopper for NT!!!! (Even though pard should now be more interested in 5♦, he is checking for the easier 9 trick game, which makes sense.
#17
Posted 2007-November-28, 10:12
2) why are we pulling penalty doubles? Seems cowardly to me. How can the double be anything but penalty. We have described our hand more accurately than a 1N opener does, so even if playing competitive dbls, partners doubles are all penalty.
3) Why did you not ask what 2S meant? Why are you guessing?
3D is most terrible bid of the auction
3S is 2nd
pass of 3S is 3rd
3S is worse than pass of 3S, because opener should realize from responder's 3D bid that responder is confused and should not trust responder to make a good decision.
#18
Posted 2007-November-28, 10:20
SoTired, on Nov 28 2007, 04:12 PM, said:
huh.. maybe because it shows a weak hand with 5431, which happens to be exactly what we have???
#19
Posted 2007-November-28, 10:38
SoTired, on Nov 28 2007, 11:12 AM, said:
Because there is a <1% chance the opponents have an agreement, so you only help them by asking.
#20
Posted 2007-November-28, 11:42
Lol...you can play whatever you want but this statement is simply wrong...very wrong.
Again if you want to play it this way, ok, but it is far from a mandatory agreement of what the convention is. In fact I think it is a poor way to play the convention but to each his own.
btw many cannot play one minor=2s as a stronger rfr raise because that is a limit raise in the bid minor.

Help
