BBO Discussion Forums: Reverse Flannery disaster - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Reverse Flannery disaster What is the worst bid?

#1 User is offline   twcho 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 327
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hong Kong

Posted 2007-November-27, 21:40

I held J7xxx 98xx A8x T, white vs red, imp.

Pard opened in 1st position with 1. Our partnership has just agreed to play reverse flannery so this was the perfect hand to start with this toy and I responded 2.

LHO overcalled 2 (no alert!) regardless of my self alert telling the opps I've got 5 and 4. Partner doubled, RHO bid 3!c. I passed, of course. LHO passed and partner doubled again. What should I bid now?
Pard RHO You LHO
1 Pass 2 2
X 3 Pass Pass
X Pass ?

l was not optimistic of setting the contract so I retreated to 3. Partner bid 3. I was not sure about the meaning of this bid and finally decided that opp may psyche the 2 or just forgot to alert his cue bid. After some moment of agony, I finally passed. The whole auction was:
Pard RHO You LHO
1 Pass 2 2
X 3 Pass Pass
X Pass 3 Pass
3 All pass

My pd has become declarer in the miserable 3 contract with his monster hand Q AK KQJTx KQ8xx. LHO did have 7 and the contract swiftly went down 3 tricks.

What is the worst bid of the whole auction? My correction to 3 or the final pass or ...?
0

#2 User is offline   TylerE 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,772
  • Joined: 2006-January-30

Posted 2007-November-27, 21:54

Worst Bid=2

Two suited bids with lousy suits suck.
0

#3 User is online   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,779
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-November-27, 22:56

2H

Alert convention police misuse, overuse of fine convention.
I play reverse flannery is around 8-11 or 7+-11
0

#4 User is offline   inquiry 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 14,566
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amelia Island, FL
  • Interests:Bridge, what else?

Posted 2007-November-27, 23:19

Assuming 2 showed crappy hand with at least 5 and 4, you have no choice but to pass 3X. Can this be takeout? No you have shown your distribution and tremendously limited your hand. (I use 2 for very weak, 2 as upto invitational).

I don't know, but when you told your story, stick to it.. partner is the boss (captain).
--Ben--

#5 User is offline   kfay 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,208
  • Joined: 2007-July-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan
  • Interests:Science, Sports

Posted 2007-November-27, 23:36

I don't have a problem with 2. This seems fine to me. But Ben is right, you've shown your hand so pass the double.
Kevin Fay
0

#6 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2007-November-28, 00:56

What Ben and The Kfay said.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#7 User is offline   Edmunte1 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 593
  • Joined: 2003-October-26
  • Location:Galati, Romania

Posted 2007-November-28, 02:04

2 is fine, you showed your shape and strength (not inv, 5++4+). His doubles are penality. You're not asked to join the party, he's on his own now.
Partner should have passed in 3 too
0

#8 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,889
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-November-28, 02:31

Hi,

the answer is simple: Removing the double.

You said, you have the perfect hand, for the bid,
i.e. you were able to describe your hand very
narrowly to partner.
So the question is, why did you take over the
role of the captain?
The only explanation is, that you did not believe
partner, and this is far worse than anything you
can do, because your action tell partner, that he
is an idiot.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#9 User is offline   benlessard 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,465
  • Joined: 2006-January-07
  • Location:Montreal Canada
  • Interests:All games. i really mean all of them.

Posted 2007-November-28, 04:52

Lets just say that 3S isnt the bid of the year !

After the X 3S has to be natural.



1- worst bid = 3S
2nd place = pulling the X

if your 2H show (6-9) or at least 6 pts. Then i give a 3rd place to 2H.

If 2H show 4 to something then 2 H is the systemic bid.
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
0

#10 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,397
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2007-November-28, 05:22

P should not have made such an ambigous 3 bid. 3N would do. You should have passed the double unless it is specifically agreed as optional, but p's 3 bid was worse IMHO.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#11 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2007-November-28, 05:44

Bidding was fine except that 3 is quite risky because there may be a misunderstanding (as there was!). I think pard shouldn't bid that. 3NT or 4 would be preferable.
0

#12 User is offline   david_c 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,178
  • Joined: 2004-November-14
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Mathematics;<br>20th century classical music;<br>Composing.

Posted 2007-November-28, 06:06

I hate 2 - it's not just the rubbish suits that are the problem, it's the good support for partner's diamonds.
0

#13 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2007-November-28, 07:11

That's not that big an issue playing strong NT.
0

#14 User is offline   Apollo81 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2006-July-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 2007-November-28, 08:06

The worst call was the 3 bid by far. You didn't promise ANY defense with the 2 bid, and you had an ace!

The 2 bid was also wrong because of the diamond support. I would respond 1 on this hand so we can play in 2 if partner rebids a minor.

The weak reverse flannery response should only be used when opener could rebid a NF 2m and you would want to bid a NF 2. This isn't the case here.
0

#15 User is offline   Al_U_Card 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,080
  • Joined: 2005-May-16
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-November-28, 09:14

Pard opens 1 intending to J/S into 3 to GF over any response. Your response confirms his intention to get to game as well as indicating that NT or a major are out of the question because of the obvious misfit and lack of communication.

Once the opps get involved, he has to decide, game in a minor or try to punish the opps? Since you are white and they are red, the double seems likely, but at what level? Based on the auction, I like your bid of 3, as it says that you have a fragment. Once he hears this, he knows that a game is likely and he should bid it. I doubt the opps would go further. When you know what to do, just do it and take the pressure off pard.

btw your comment "Partner bid 3♠. I was not sure about the meaning of this bid" if not sure then it is forcing :lol:

So, the pass of 3 is the worst bid as it was ambiguous to you but I took it in the context as asking about a stopper for NT!!!! (Even though pard should now be more interested in 5, he is checking for the easier 9 trick game, which makes sense.
The Grand Design, reflected in the face of Chaos...it's a fluke!
0

#16 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2007-November-28, 10:07

5 cards is a stopper :lol:
0

#17 User is offline   SoTired 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,016
  • Joined: 2005-June-20
  • Location:Lovettsville, VA

Posted 2007-November-28, 10:12

1) You have 5-8 hcp, 5s & 4h, so 2H is mandatory. All the other criticism about your 2H bid don't seem to understand the RFR convention, so they can be ignored.
2) why are we pulling penalty doubles? Seems cowardly to me. How can the double be anything but penalty. We have described our hand more accurately than a 1N opener does, so even if playing competitive dbls, partners doubles are all penalty.
3) Why did you not ask what 2S meant? Why are you guessing?

3D is most terrible bid of the auction
3S is 2nd
pass of 3S is 3rd

3S is worse than pass of 3S, because opener should realize from responder's 3D bid that responder is confused and should not trust responder to make a good decision.
It costs nothing to be nice -- my better half
0

#18 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2007-November-28, 10:20

SoTired, on Nov 28 2007, 04:12 PM, said:

why are we pulling penalty doubles?

huh.. maybe because it shows a weak hand with 5431, which happens to be exactly what we have???
0

#19 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2007-November-28, 10:38

SoTired, on Nov 28 2007, 11:12 AM, said:

3) Why did you not ask what 2S meant? Why are you guessing?

Because there is a <1% chance the opponents have an agreement, so you only help them by asking.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#20 User is online   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,779
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-November-28, 11:42

"1) You have 5-8 hcp, 5s & 4h, so 2H is mandatory. All the other criticism about your 2H bid don't seem to understand the RFR convention, so they can be ignored."



Lol...you can play whatever you want but this statement is simply wrong...very wrong. :) 2H is not mandatory and many experts do not play RFR this way.
Again if you want to play it this way, ok, but it is far from a mandatory agreement of what the convention is. In fact I think it is a poor way to play the convention but to each his own. :)

btw many cannot play one minor=2s as a stronger rfr raise because that is a limit raise in the bid minor.
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users