What's your call? LHO has diamonds.
#2
Posted 2006-May-21, 09:46
Ironically, I think its a tougher hand over 1D instead of 2D, unless you play a gadget.
#3
Posted 2006-May-21, 09:57
#4
Posted 2006-May-21, 11:06
Double followed by 3C 'if' partner bids 2S.
Clubs games are fairly bad here in one of the three strongest bridge areas in America.
60% might win only in a smaller weaker club game here.
Regards,
Robert
#5
Posted 2006-May-21, 13:53
#6
Posted 2006-May-21, 14:11
Al_U_Card, on May 21 2006, 02:53 PM, said:
How do I know this, when I decide which call to make?
I think I will bid 3C, but if dbl followed by 3C over 2S
does not promise add. strength, than the bid is better.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#7
Posted 2006-May-21, 14:48
I guess the question is: "Which of the available calls is the most expressive of your values and suited to the current situation?"
#8
Posted 2006-May-21, 20:07
I'm not going to pass 2♦, and then having to decide what to do over 3♦
#9
Posted 2006-May-21, 22:05
pclayton, on May 21 2006, 10:46 AM, said:
Ironically, I think its a tougher hand over 1D instead of 2D, unless you play a gadget.
I don't understand your comment. Are you saying double then bid clubs shows lots of extras after a 1♦ opening but not after a 2♦ opening?
#11
Posted 2006-May-22, 04:03
#13
Posted 2006-May-22, 07:05
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#14
Posted 2006-May-22, 07:41
So, after hearing
2♦ DBL 3♦
can you resist bidding 4♠?
I couldn't. Pard said he expected 5 good spades so he didn't correct.
#15
Posted 2006-May-22, 08:21
Do I not risk missing the heart fit if I don't double? Sure, can happen, but as said many times before: bridge is a game of percentages, and the odds favour a 2♠ (or higher) response when I am 2-4 in the majors.
Roland
#16
Posted 2006-May-22, 09:15
I trade off being able to show a moderate 2 suiter in exchange for a huge hand single suiter holding clubs. I think I'm ahead from a frequency standpoint.
I don't think this is a big deal since many club single suiters (especially) solid can bid 3D or 3N directly over 2D.
#17
Posted 2006-May-22, 09:18
Wouldnt 3S suffice? You are not forced to bid here. So 3S should show a hand with values, and only promising 4 spades, allowing partner to further describe his hand.
Not that I am all that thrilled with the original X, but partner could just as easily have been on a 3 card spade suit for his original X, and 4S still may not be the best spot. On this auction I would expect spades to break 5-1 (if on a 4-3 fit) at a much higher frequency than normal.
So many experts, not enough X cards.
#18
Posted 2006-May-22, 09:18
I trade off being able to show a moderate 2 suiter in exchange for a huge hand single suiter holding clubs. I think I'm ahead from a frequency standpoint.
I don't think this is a big deal since many club single suiters (especially) solid can bid 3D or 3N directly over 2D.
#19
Posted 2006-May-22, 09:22
I trade off being able to show a moderate 2 suiter in exchange for a huge hand single suiter holding clubs. I think I'm ahead from a frequency standpoint.
I don't think this is a big deal since many club single suiters (especially) solid can bid 3D or 3N directly over 2D.
#20
Posted 2006-May-22, 09:24
So many experts, not enough X cards.

Help

RHO opens 2♦ in first seat. Just a club game against one of the better pairs. This is the penultimate board and you are in the lead (60%). How to proceed?