Benellis58 GIB bashing on repeat Groundhog Day
#1341
Posted 2026-May-02, 13:31
Now, it's certainly true that my...ahem...1NT overcall (!) could have been better, but forgetting about MY foibles (including whether i might have done better in the play, which I haven't bothered to look at), I think the raise to 3S is NOT an action that rates to do well...and this thread is not about bashing ME (thank Heaven!), it's about bashing the ROBOTS, so I rest my case...and I'll see myself out.
https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/2ewpytve
#1342
Posted 2026-May-02, 13:38
https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/5x2tjpsr
#1343
Posted 2026-May-02, 13:44
Meanwhile, North proved for the Nth time that the GIBBO robots have absolutely NO idea of how to bid two-suiters.
https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/y7cnb5rc
#1344
Posted 2026-May-02, 13:52
https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/53x244d5
#1345
Posted Yesterday, 05:55
Note that the human South DOES respect the GIB definition of his double (although admittedly he often does not, because of the complete and utter contempt he has for the often pathetic GIB definitions foisted on him through GIBBO's piece of garbage system) and that his hand is perfectly described by the definition.
Note, on the other hand, that the piece of trash GIBBO robot in the North does NOT follow his own GIB definition. The GIB definition of 4C is, in any case, the useless piece of bilge that GIB definitions so often are, as it says NOTHING except "10-11 total points". North has a mere 9 HCP, and the idea of "total" points is very questionable, since his only shortness is in DIAMONDS, which is South's KNOWN long suit, not only on the auction, but also as DEFINED in the GIB definition.
Additionally. 3 of North's 9 HCP are in the ENEMY suit of clubs. Note that the TWO game contracts that NS can make (thanks to the 3-3 splits in both spades and diamonds, AND the queen of diamonds being onside) are: 3NT, which North might have bid, but didn't, and 5D, where North PULLED South's 4 DIAMONDS to HEARTS.
https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/2p8emb39
#1346
Posted Yesterday, 06:15
However, even if they had scored a HUNDRED percent, it would not have altered the fact that the GIBBO robot in the East made a truly ignorant bid (what else is new?) of 3C on his ratty little A832...in a hand that he had already OPENED one CLUB. The *****ous dolt would have been a lot better off bidding 2S. It would have given his partner West the option of passing (if West thought that best) or converting to 3C (if West had a decent club fit and thought that clubs would be a better spot). TWO kicks at the can instead of the USUAL imbecilic GIBBO "strategy" of UNILATERALLY and for no reason making the final decision for the partnership. And...2S would NOT have overstated East's spade length, because East's earlier pass over North's 2H had already denied his having three or more spades.
https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/2p8527fk
#1347
Posted Yesterday, 06:49
https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/2jnbht7d
#1348
Posted Yesterday, 06:54
https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/3mzr3ze2
#1349
Posted Yesterday, 06:59
https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/mpj85xzv
#1350
Posted Yesterday, 07:02
https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/ycktz2jz
#1351
Posted Yesterday, 14:42
#1352
Posted Yesterday, 14:55
At trick three, West stupidly wastes his heart jack from J107, LOOKING at the stiff king in dummy. East can counteract his partner's stupidity by playing his 8 from 83 doubleton, thereby unblocking the defensive communication in hearts caused by West's imbecilic play, but since East is also that species of slime known as a GIBBO robot, the play is FAR beyond his ability. Then at trick four, East (incompetent jerk that he is) stupidly (what else?) pops his club king. These two pieces of dirt combine to score a typically miserable 3.6 % on the board for typically wretched "defence". They belong in a garbage dump, not on an otherwise fine bridge site.
https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/bdddpbyy
#1353
Posted Yesterday, 15:12
South's double of 4S is uselessly and stupidly defined as "2+ spades". That's IT. That's ALL. That's the COMPLETE "definition! Who in the HELL thought that this bilge was even worth writing?
It says NOTHING about points. It says NOTHING about shape (except for the LUDICROUS garbage about "2+ spades", which in and of itself is total and complete nonsense). It says NOTHING about the intent of the double: Is it for penalty? For takeout? Is it showing "cards", and if so, within what parameters? Is it a DSI double, and if so, how the HELL can the doubler's partner "do something intelligent" when he doesn't know what the HELL the double is supposed to show? What the HELL is the double supposed to BE? What the HELL is the double supposed to SHOW? How the HELL can the doubler's partner EVER have an intelligent idea of what to do when the double is a MYSTERY thanks to the piece of stinking garbage that is SUPPOSED to be a definition?
Any time I look at a GIB definition, I fully expect to see worthless trash, but EVEN with that expectation, THIS one surprised me, because it's even MORE worthless than most GIB definitions are, and most GIB definitions are completely wretched to begin with.
https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/2p8tm7ra
#1354
Posted Yesterday, 15:14
https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/2p8asdpf
#1355
Posted Yesterday, 16:00
At trick five, I lead the heart 4 from dummy's remaining 74 doubleton. This is the second time hearts have been played, as Superstooge led the suit after stupidly winning his diamond ace at trick two. So now, at trick five, East plays his heart 9 from his remaining 98 doubleton. He wins the trick, as I play the 3 from my remaining K53 tripleton and West plays the 6 from his remaining 106 doubleton. East now leads...his last HEART. Of COURSE he leads a HEART, because that is the suit that DECLARER was playing, and these incompetent jackasses LOVE to play the suit DECLARER plays...because they possess ZERO logic and have NO IDEA how to play bridge.
East-West score 7.1 % on the board. North-South score 92.9 %. East-West probably don't even realize that they could have "defended" better. East-West will probably defend the next thousand hands of this type exactly the same way, because East-West are GIBBO robots, and GIBBO robots know SQUAT about how to play bridge. GIBBO robots rot. GIBBO robots suck pumice. GIBBO robots are the worst.
https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/bdduwhuc
#1356
Posted Yesterday, 16:18
North could conceivably: Pass 1NT. Bid 2C. Bid 2NT. Bid 3C. I certainly don't rate all of those equally, but I could at least UNDERSTAND each of those choices, and if North had made any of those four calls I would not have written this post, regardless of what our result was.
But North didn't make any of those calls. North bid two hearts...on his three-bagger. GIB apparently recommends this, as the GIB definition indicates. One more reason to incinerate or bury everything GIB and GIBBO-related.
BTW, in robot games, many of MY bids are bizarre. The reason is "When in Rome,...". In other words, in any GIBBO robot game, I know that I'm playing with an incompetent lunatic against two incompetent lunatics, so I might as well roll the dice.
https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/2p8ccaz7
#1357
Posted Yesterday, 16:52
The GIBBO robots are playing their "normal" bridge game and trying their (snicker) "best" to WIN as many tricks as possible.
Watch the play of this hand and observe how MANY monumentally stupid plays they make. I don't have time to document all the GLARINGLY imbecilic plays these pieces of garbage make on this ONE hand. Life is too short.
These GIBBO robots are the absolute pits. They stink so badly at bridge that they should be sprayed with disinfectant. It is astounding that anyone or anything could be as utterly hopeless as these rejects.
https://www.bridgeba...DQ%7Cpc%7CS2%7C
#1358
Posted Today, 03:35
https://www.bridgeba...D4%7Cmc%7C10%7C
#1359
Posted Today, 03:52
Not only that, he did it with an auction where he basically INVITED NS to double 4S. His 3D mixed raise was strategically and tactically silly, given that his partner West was a passed hand. Also, given that as his eventual 4S bid proved, he was ALWAYS willing to (stupidly) "compete" (ha, HA!) to 4S, he should have immediately leapt to 3S or 4S over North's double and then passed forever after that. EVEN after his poor choice of the mixed raise followed by 3S, he should have - definitely - passed over 4D, because he had already TOLD his story to both his "partner" West and the opponents. When he bid 3S and THEN 4S, he was BEGGING to get doubled.
https://www.bridgeba...CS3%7Cmc%7C8%7C
#1360
Posted Today, 04:17
I was just getting that issue out of the way to cut off any thoughts on it before they even arise, but that of course is not why I'm posting this hand. I'm posting this hand to...DUH...bash the GIBBO robots, because that's what this essential thread that Diana so wisely created is all about. So, let's bash:
Why, why, WHY does North remain SILENT throughout the auction...even after South not only opens the bidding in second seat red against white, but also reopens (!) with a double of 2H? These clueless GIBBO goofballs often bid on nothing more than a few strands of cheese, yet here this oblivious and COWARDLY dimwit in the North has TWELVE (!!!) HCP, including two aces (!) and a king (!), yet he lays down like the braindead, gutless wimp that he is. These GIBBO jerks are not only witless, they are also erratic and inconsistent, and those are just a SMALL number of the reasons that they and their equally rancid GIB predecessors are indisputably the absolutely worst "bridge players" that I have ever...EVER...had the displeasure of encountering in my life. They totally rot and are far worse than even the WORST human player I have ever seen.
https://www.bridgeba...D6%7Cpc%7CSK%7C

Help
