Page 1 of 1
Bid or Pass with this hand? Another patented Rex and Jay argument
#1
Posted 2005-March-23, 11:36
Scoring: BAM
#2
Posted 2005-March-23, 12:08
One addendum, 3!S is NF. Assume auction went 1!H-1!S-2!D-3!S, would you accept?
Rex weighs in, which is uncommon :-)
Rex weighs in, which is uncommon :-)
"A stopper is neither weak nor strong but thinking makes it so." H. Kelsey
#4
Posted 2005-March-23, 13:23
4♠ if 3♠ shows a 6+ card.
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
#5
Posted 2005-March-23, 16:44
On IMP, I would bid 4S. MP? I am not sure, pass is another option. 3NT? no
Senshu
#6
Posted 2005-March-23, 18:16
I don't know enough about this version of Kaplan Inversion you are playing, but presumably 2D shows at least 9 red cards. So, 3S needs to promise 6 goods at least, similar to disciplined weak 2.
4S for me. Even at BAM. Every reason to think I have a ruffing value and hearts aren't running.
4S for me. Even at BAM. Every reason to think I have a ruffing value and hearts aren't running.
"Phil" on BBO
#8
Posted 2005-March-24, 18:29
the 3S bid presumably shows <13 hcp and 6+ spades... i pass this i think... the question is, had partner opened a weak 2 would i go to 4... 4S can make easily enough, but too many things have to be right... first of all, you need no spade losers else one and a top diamond *and* either the heart being right or the ♣A being right
i hope i'm not being too pessimistic, but i wouldn't bid 4S over a weak 2
i hope i'm not being too pessimistic, but i wouldn't bid 4S over a weak 2
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)
#9
Posted 2005-March-24, 18:43
luke warm, on Mar 24 2005, 04:29 PM, said:
the 3S bid presumably shows <13 hcp and 6+ spades... i pass this i think... the question is, had partner opened a weak 2 would i go to 4... 4S can make easily enough, but too many things have to be right... first of all, you need no spade losers else one and a top diamond *and* either the heart being right or the ♣A being right
i hope i'm not being too pessimistic, but i wouldn't bid 4S over a weak 2
i hope i'm not being too pessimistic, but i wouldn't bid 4S over a weak 2
Maybe not, but if you knew pard had the absolute max and a great suit would you go?
"Phil" on BBO
#10
Posted 2005-March-24, 19:05
probably... but give him 6 in spades (A, Q) and the ♣A.. there's still a possible spade loser, heart loser, 2 diamonds...
if you knew he had those cards specifically, would you go? you need (maybe, depending on his dist) 2 finesses to work... anything could be right, and i might be too pessimistic
if you knew he had those cards specifically, would you go? you need (maybe, depending on his dist) 2 finesses to work... anything could be right, and i might be too pessimistic
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)
#11
Posted 2005-March-24, 20:14
Seems very close between pass and 4S. I would not consider 3NT.
I voted pass, but not with confidence.
I voted pass, but not with confidence.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.
- hrothgar
- hrothgar
#12
Posted 2005-March-25, 11:30
Hannie, on Mar 25 2005, 02:14 AM, said:
Seems very close between pass and 4S. I would not consider 3NT.
I voted pass, but not with confidence.
I voted pass, but not with confidence.
Doesn't this hand have a queen extra compared to what I promised? Wouldn't you open
♠65 ♥AJT9x ♦QJT9 ♣K8?
(Although a little late, happy birthday btw!)
Arend
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
Page 1 of 1

Help
