As I play in the UK we see a lot of auctions like 1NT-P-P-P or P-1NT-P-P etc
In the first situation, current regs are 1Nt-X or 1NT-P-P-X must be penalty although I think that changes in April.
With 1NT-P-P-X would you recommend doubling with less than 16pts as a balancing double (increases likelyhood of partner needing to take out etc)
What responses would you recommend?
Part ii
You're a passed hand and RHO opens a weak NT.. ie P-1NT-P-P
You play Astro so you can show 5M-4m/M hands in balancing seat
What should DBL show now?
If you play it as say hold a balanced 10-11 count now
What should partners responses mean?
I was considering treating it as if I had opened 1NT
Pass = penalty partner has balanced 12-15 not strong enough to double
2C = Stayman
2D=Tfr to Hearts
2H=Tfr to spades
2S=Range ask showing 14-15pts considering 3NT
2NT - tfr to Clubs
3C= Tfr to Minor
Is it sensible or madness or should all bids be natural?
Steve
Page 1 of 1
Bidding goes P-1NT(12-14)-P-P-?
#2
Posted 2005-February-24, 08:25
badderzboy, on Feb 24 2005, 08:44 AM, said:
Part ii
You're a passed hand and RHO opens a weak NT.. ie P-1NT-P-P
You play Astro so you can show 5M-4m/M hands in balancing seat
What should DBL show now?
You're a passed hand and RHO opens a weak NT.. ie P-1NT-P-P
You play Astro so you can show 5M-4m/M hands in balancing seat
What should DBL show now?
I doubt that it's a good idea to play dbl as showing a maximum pass. If you're playing Astro then you can't bid a natural 2♣ or 2♦, so you could use double for that sort of hand. Alternatively, use dbl to show a 5-card minor and a 4-card major.
(Or, even better, stop playing Astro when you're a passed hand - it's not really designed for that situation.)
#3
Posted 2005-February-24, 08:32
With a passed hand: play a Woolsey double:
Dbl = 4-card major + 5+card minor
Responses
2♣ = pass or bid 2♦
2♦ = bid your major
2M = 6-card suit
Dbl = 4-card major + 5+card minor
Responses
2♣ = pass or bid 2♦
2♦ = bid your major
2M = 6-card suit
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do!
#4
Posted 2005-February-24, 09:07
In one partnership I play double as "maximum pass".
Various people laugh at us and say what a stupid method, but it picks up some nice penalties.
In a different partnership I play a different defence to 1NT by a passed hand. We play double as a three-suiter including spades (3-suiter can be 4432 or 4333 on a really bad day). You include spades as there's no point getting them out of 1NT into their spade fit...
Partner passes the double if 1NT should be going off, or bids pass-or-correct suits.
Various people laugh at us and say what a stupid method, but it picks up some nice penalties.
In a different partnership I play a different defence to 1NT by a passed hand. We play double as a three-suiter including spades (3-suiter can be 4432 or 4333 on a really bad day). You include spades as there's no point getting them out of 1NT into their spade fit...
Partner passes the double if 1NT should be going off, or bids pass-or-correct suits.
#5 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2005-February-24, 12:14
i think bids should just be natural in response to the X
#6
Posted 2005-February-25, 06:15
Incidently, it's only at level III that double must be used as penalty as a non-passed hand vs 1NT. At level IV any defence goes.
After April 1st, any defence is permitted at level III as well. AT LONG LAST!!!
After April 1st, any defence is permitted at level III as well. AT LONG LAST!!!
#7
Posted 2005-February-25, 08:59
FrancesHinden, on Feb 24 2005, 05:07 PM, said:
In one partnership I play double as "maximum pass".
Various people laugh at us and say what a stupid method, but it picks up some nice penalties.
Various people laugh at us and say what a stupid method, but it picks up some nice penalties.
for both sides i suppose ;-)
#8
Posted 2005-February-28, 05:12
Maximum pass is probably not so bad if you assume 1-suiters in majors are no longer needed and you build a new structure.
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do!
Page 1 of 1