I was recently dealt a nice 0=6=3=4 hand opposite GIB's 2NT opening.
2NT-3♦
3♥-4♣
4♥
So far so good. I've shown five of my six hearts and all of my clubs, as well as a hand at least good enough to force game. The problem is that now I had no slam move. New suits after GIB's 4♥ (which confirmed 3 card support according to the description) were still natural, showing 4+ cards. Bidding clubs again showed a 6-5 with longer clubs. My only slammish move, besides bidding slam, was RKCB. The alternative was to raise hearts directly, which shows some SI and six hearts, but I felt it was better to pattern out.
I think 4♥ should set trump with new suits being cue bids. I admit I haven't checked what 5♥ would've been, it's usually some sort of general slam try, but probably cue bidding would be better if available.
Page 1 of 1
2NT slam killer GIB's system, no hand
#2
Posted 2014-February-16, 22:35
Again as in many many posts cuebidding above game is very confusing.
This is yet another thread that shows that.
I just don't think there is any standard measurement to believe in.
This is yet another thread that shows that.
I just don't think there is any standard measurement to believe in.
#3
Posted 2014-February-16, 23:05
If 5D shows a 4 card suit I would be inclined to try that.
Psych (pron. saik): A gross and deliberate misstatement of honour strength and/or suit length. Expressly permitted under Law 73E but forbidden contrary to that law by Acol club tourneys.
Psyche (pron. sahy-kee): The human soul, spirit or mind (derived, personification thereof, beloved of Eros, Greek myth).
Masterminding (pron. m
s
t
r-m
nd
ing) tr. v. - Any bid made by bridge player with which partner disagrees.
"Gentlemen, when the barrage lifts." 9th battalion, King's own Yorkshire light infantry,
2000 years earlier: "morituri te salutant"
"I will be with you, whatever". Blair to Bush, precursor to invasion of Iraq
Psyche (pron. sahy-kee): The human soul, spirit or mind (derived, personification thereof, beloved of Eros, Greek myth).
Masterminding (pron. m
s
t
r-m
nd
ing) tr. v. - Any bid made by bridge player with which partner disagrees."Gentlemen, when the barrage lifts." 9th battalion, King's own Yorkshire light infantry,
2000 years earlier: "morituri te salutant"
"I will be with you, whatever". Blair to Bush, precursor to invasion of Iraq
#4
Posted 2014-February-17, 07:07
how nice a hand? it would be helpful to see the hand.
if opener had good fit for you he could have made a squeeze bid 4♦ to announce interest in slam (without setting trump) Don't know if GIB has this probably not but good human bid lol
opener could have 4 or 5 good spades and slam is doomed with 4♥ bid
if opener had good fit for you he could have made a squeeze bid 4♦ to announce interest in slam (without setting trump) Don't know if GIB has this probably not but good human bid lol
opener could have 4 or 5 good spades and slam is doomed with 4♥ bid
Sarcasm is a state of mind
#5
Posted 2014-February-17, 15:13
Well, I ran 3-4 simulations giving north a balanced 20-21 with <4 clubs and 3 hearts and south with a 8-10 HCP 0-6-3-4 or 0-6-4-3. This creates the same auction on all of them
Good slams were missed on these cards:
The other hand was a 50% slam.
Good slams were missed on these cards:
The other hand was a 50% slam.
Become yourself.
#6
Posted 2014-February-17, 16:52
hand 1 - solid hearts by responder, driving to slam or at least making that 5♥ bid GIB likes to make
hand 2 & 3 too much of a fit and control heavy would not just bid 4♥ would bid 4♦, GIB probably should bid 5♥ it likes that bid
appreciate your effort but the problem is if opener heavy in queens and jacks and has pts in spades but not AK (Q) which will be handy
hand 2 & 3 too much of a fit and control heavy would not just bid 4♥ would bid 4♦, GIB probably should bid 5♥ it likes that bid
appreciate your effort but the problem is if opener heavy in queens and jacks and has pts in spades but not AK (Q) which will be handy
Sarcasm is a state of mind
#7
Posted 2014-February-17, 22:11
The issue here isn't should responder drive to slam. It's that when responder wants to drive to slam, there's no intelligent way to do so. You can bid slam, you can do pessimistic keycard, or you can fake a suit at the 5-level and see if GIB has anything smart to say about that.
Cue bidding would've been a much more straightforward way to go about things, I feel.
Cue bidding would've been a much more straightforward way to go about things, I feel.
Page 1 of 1

Help
