Help
Page 1 of 1
Delayed Michaels?
#1
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,542
- Joined: 2010-February-01
- Gender:Male
- Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA
Posted 2012-February-24, 08:46
What is the explanation of the 2♦ bid?
#2
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 7,786
- Joined: 2004-September-05
- Gender:Male
- Location:Galloway NJ USA
-
Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.
Posted 2012-February-24, 09:11
What would it mean to a rational human being? Diamonds.
The Robot "thought" it showed diamonds, even if the explanation offered by the system was Michaels.
As Spock would say, "Fascinating!"
The Robot "thought" it showed diamonds, even if the explanation offered by the system was Michaels.
As Spock would say, "Fascinating!"
#3
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 781
- Joined: 2012-January-31
- Gender:Male
Posted 2012-February-24, 09:44
There's a problem with the explanation system here, as if the Robot wanted to show the majors he could have cued 2♦ on the first round. The balancing 2♦ should always show diamonds in this spot, lest a player be robbed entirely of his ability to bid the minor naturally whenever an opponent opens a convenient minor.
There is a big difference between a good decision and a good result. Let's keep our posts about good decisions rather than "gotcha" results!
#4
- Group: Yellows
- Posts: 1,317
- Joined: 2007-December-30
- Gender:Male
- Location:Bulgaria
Posted 2012-February-26, 13:23
Thanks for reporting. It was a bug, where the explanation was wrongly put there. Corrected in the next update.
The meaning for the particular hand would be here 2♦ - -- 5+ ♦; 10+ HCP; 16- total points
The meaning for the particular hand would be here 2♦ - -- 5+ ♦; 10+ HCP; 16- total points
Page 1 of 1