whereagles, on 2011-July-23, 06:03, said:
Careful, you're beginning to get obsessed by compound squeezes
Anyway, you could try
♦AK (heart discard) and a third, eventually ruffing with the ten, depending on you read the suit. If you get overruffed, remaining trumps probably are split 2-1 and diamonds still set up for 12 tricks. But yeah, you will be going down on some layouts and the contract is probably a great score in all but world-class fields. Since I'm stupid, I'd probably try for 13 tricks anyway lol.
Let's say West has 7 hearts. Then clubs 0=4 is 14%, but the compound squeeze line reverts to your line when finding no clubs in West (though you do better when diamonds 4-2), so I'll ignore this. My numbers will be off a bit because I'm now really assuming clubs not 0=4, but it shouldn't change them too much.
Given 7 hearts in West, a split of 0=6 or 1=5 in diamonds is 26%, 2=4 in diamonds is 40%, 3=3 or 4=2 in diamonds is 34%. Given 2=4 diamonds, West having
♣J is 1 in 3, and stiff
♣J is roughly 1 in 9. So you're down roughly 30% of the time and making seven roughly 34% of the time.
I won't work out how often the compound squeeze line makes seven. Let's just do the spade-diamond simple squeeze against East: West needs at most 2 spades and at most 2 diamonds (or longer diamonds without
♦QJ, but I'll leave this out). This is almost 23%. It will go down due to clubs 0=4 more often than your line, because it needs to pick up diamonds with one ruff, but even 23-14 is more than 34-30.
So even if you're playing BAM and expect your opposition to get to 6
♣, you want to play safely with the squeeze chances.