IMP NV
You hold AKQJTx Ax KQxx x and I will force a 2♣ bid on you.
Partner responds 3♦, your bid.
Page 1 of 1
Change tack?
#1
Posted 2011-March-06, 08:36
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Bridge should be fun!
Bridge should be fun!
#2
Posted 2011-March-06, 08:45
This worked out great, I will ask for key cards based on ♦, then play 6♦ opposite one (too dangerous if ♦A and ruff in 6♠ happens) and 7NT opposite two.
#3
Posted 2011-March-06, 09:54
will I play 5♦ on a 4-1 fit?
What Gerben said
I would love to bid 4♦ before blackwood to clarify partner what is going on, but he might have no cuebid avaible in a major
What Gerben said
I would love to bid 4♦ before blackwood to clarify partner what is going on, but he might have no cuebid avaible in a major
#4
Posted 2011-March-06, 11:23
Simple as that heh, in hindsight it sounds great.
I bid 4♦, partner responded 5♣
I bid 4♦, partner responded 5♣
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Bridge should be fun!
Bridge should be fun!
#6
Posted 2011-March-07, 09:05
I wonder how partner can bid 3♦ with only 1 tophonour.
Anyway, I'd bid Blacky (whatever method - Gerber/minorwood/kickback/RKC/...). We only need to know about Aces.
If you lack such agreement I guess 4♦ is a pretty obvious rebid. If partner now bids 5♣, he denies a ♥ and ♠ control. With only ♦A for his 3♦ bid, I guess he must have ♣A as well. I'll bid 7♦.
Btw, if possible I'd bid voidwood in any of the suits. If opps know me, they'll know that I sometimes bid voidwood without an actual void so they might lead that suit anyway. This time however, when it's voidwood ♥ or ♠, I'd love that lead.
Anyway, I'd bid Blacky (whatever method - Gerber/minorwood/kickback/RKC/...). We only need to know about Aces.
If you lack such agreement I guess 4♦ is a pretty obvious rebid. If partner now bids 5♣, he denies a ♥ and ♠ control. With only ♦A for his 3♦ bid, I guess he must have ♣A as well. I'll bid 7♦.
Btw, if possible I'd bid voidwood in any of the suits. If opps know me, they'll know that I sometimes bid voidwood without an actual void so they might lead that suit anyway. This time however, when it's voidwood ♥ or ♠, I'd love that lead.
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
#7
Posted 2011-March-07, 20:34
He slightly fudged the 3♦ bid, this was his hand x Jx AJTxxx Ax
and our auction
2♣:3♦
4♦:5♣
6♦:6N
7N
So we got there but I think the direct Ace ask is better.
and our auction
2♣:3♦
4♦:5♣
6♦:6N
7N
So we got there but I think the direct Ace ask is better.
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Bridge should be fun!
Bridge should be fun!
#8
Posted 2011-March-08, 01:33
I approve of the partner's 3♦ bid. A hand that strong with AJTxxx of diamonds ought to suggest diamonds even if the 2♣-3♦ auction is awkward. And agree that keycard is all you need as you can be confident 6♦ is making and just need to check on 7nt.
#9
Posted 2011-March-09, 07:28
Better ask for keycards right away because pard may not have cue available if you bid 4♦.
Besides, all you need is to know the aces across, so 4NT will sort it out. No need for "daisy-picking"
Besides, all you need is to know the aces across, so 4NT will sort it out. No need for "daisy-picking"
Page 1 of 1

Help

