Page 1 of 1
weak 2 vs singleton
#1
Posted 2010-July-08, 15:16
♠6
♥AK52
♦AK1094
♣Q62
all vul, partner opens first position 2♠ weak, pass to you
2NT is feature ask, 3♦ forcing, if you bid 2NT what do you bid over 3♣/♠/NT?
♥AK52
♦AK1094
♣Q62
all vul, partner opens first position 2♠ weak, pass to you
2NT is feature ask, 3♦ forcing, if you bid 2NT what do you bid over 3♣/♠/NT?
#2
Posted 2010-July-08, 15:20
Lets assume that partner tables a beautiful hand
♠ AKTxxx
♥ xx
♦ xx
♣ xxx
You still rate to lose three clubs and a spade...
Are there really than many constructions where 4♠ has serious play?
♠ AKTxxx
♥ xx
♦ xx
♣ xxx
You still rate to lose three clubs and a spade...
Are there really than many constructions where 4♠ has serious play?
Alderaan delenda est
#3
Posted 2010-July-08, 15:31
KQJTxx xx Qxx xx and the like? Also some people open hands with 7 spades at the 2 level when vulnerable if the hand is a bit lacking in oomph, like KQTxxxx xx Jx xx. Plus isn't your beautiful hand a minimum (when vulnerable) anyway? I'll bid 2NT and bid game opposite any maximum, although I really wish I had ogust so I could bid 3NT opposite good hand bad suit.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
#6
Posted 2010-July-08, 18:16
I am passing.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
#7
Posted 2010-July-08, 18:35
Well I must really be insane, I still think I would bid and go to game opposite a max! Or maybe my preempts are just that sound?
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
#8
Posted 2010-July-08, 18:44
I am a bidder, 2NT I suppose, then with the specified methods 3NT over partner's 3♣ and maybe 4♠ otherwise.
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
#9
Posted 2010-July-08, 18:55
Yes! YES!!!
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
#10
Posted 2010-July-08, 19:10
Playing the style I prefer I wouldn't pass.
I like "weak two" to be just weak opening and not "preempt" with any random crap.
I hate the thought of not playing game if partner tables standard hand: KQJxxx xx xx Kxx.
I like "weak two" to be just weak opening and not "preempt" with any random crap.
I hate the thought of not playing game if partner tables standard hand: KQJxxx xx xx Kxx.
#11
Posted 2010-July-08, 19:33
I keep seeing great hands on the forums where our genius two-way preempts (2red=4-7 with the next suit or 8-10 with this suit) would work out great, but they never seem to come up at the table. Opposite 8-10 I'd move and 4-7 it would be a very simple pass.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#13
Posted 2010-July-09, 00:38
I would invite too opposite the hands I expect from my regular partner.
Opposite the hands I would expect from Csaba, I would pass and hope that the do not double.
Opposite the hands I would expect from Csaba, I would pass and hope that the do not double.
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#14
Posted 2010-July-09, 17:39
Very close Richard, partner had
♠AK108xx
♥xx
♦J8
♣xxx
4♠ should go down 2, but at the other table it was just down 1.
However the contract that makes is 3NT, stiff ♦Q onside and clubs 4-3
♠AK108xx
♥xx
♦J8
♣xxx
4♠ should go down 2, but at the other table it was just down 1.
However the contract that makes is 3NT, stiff ♦Q onside and clubs 4-3
#15
Posted 2010-July-13, 10:02
It all hinges what pard 2sp is----I insist that non vuln weak 2's are crap,6-11,
but vuln 9-11.
so with the hand i do not enquire i just bid 3n/t.
but vuln 9-11.
so with the hand i do not enquire i just bid 3n/t.
Page 1 of 1

Help
