Rebid question
#1
Posted 2010-April-29, 16:41
You open 1♦ and partner responds 1♠. Please rate 1NT, 2♦, 2♠ and any other rebid you would consider on a scale of 0-10 points.
(If it matters, 1NT opener is 14-16 and 1♦ promised 4.)
-- Bertrand Russell
#2
Posted 2010-April-29, 16:55
2♠ 2
1N 1
(still learning)
#3
Posted 2010-April-29, 17:00
2♠ 6
1N 0
IN is simply not bridge. If you want to maximize mp entitlement (the reason most rush into NT), bid spades instead of diamonds.
I don't mind 2♠ very much, but this hand is not quite good enough, for spades, to want to have partner be aggressive. When one is choosing between rebidding a minor and raising, one factor to consider is that partner will often be forced to pass 2minor when knowing of major support would allow him to move towards game. But this hand is so weak that I don't mind being dropped in 2♦ even (especially) when he has a hand that would invite game if I had raised.
#5
Posted 2010-April-29, 17:09
2♦ 10
2♠ 5
Monkey 0
#6
Posted 2010-April-29, 17:11
jillybean, on Apr 29 2010, 06:55 PM, said:
2♠ 2
1N 1
agreed, although that might be generous to 1NT.
#7
Posted 2010-April-29, 17:18
2D
2N
3D
George Carlin
#8
Posted 2010-April-29, 17:23
Gwnn I raise on AKx xx Axxxxx xx.
#9
Posted 2010-April-29, 21:16
jdonn, on Apr 29 2010, 06:23 PM, said:
Gwnn I raise on AKx xx Axxxxx xx.
This looks about right of course we don't know if this is IMPs or MPs
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#10
Posted 2010-April-29, 21:45
#12
Posted 2010-April-29, 22:00
I will go with:
2♦ 10
2♠ 4
1NT 1
#13
Posted 2010-April-30, 02:31
2♦ 10
2♠ 5
1NT 0
#14
Posted 2010-April-30, 04:21
jdonn, on Apr 29 2010, 11:23 PM, said:
I'm not happy to raise with AKx because I don't like to see partner ruff with the K and A but I'd raise too because everything else looks worse.
George Carlin
#15
Posted 2010-April-30, 05:52
mgoetze, on Apr 29 2010, 10:41 PM, said:
1♦ 1♠. Please rate 1NT, 2♦, 2♠ and any other rebid you would consider on a scale of 0-10 points.
(If it matters, 1NT opener is 14-16 and 1♦ promised 4.)
2♦: 10
1NT: 6
2♠: 3
other: 0
2♦: the standard bid here. It will only be inferior if pard has 5314 and a weakish hand (he'll pass 2♦ when 2♠ would probably be better).
1NT: not a big lie and has the advantage of making it easy to reach a 2♠ contract.
2♠: this is guessing that 2♠ on what can be an xxxx suit across is a better contract than diamonds. It's one-sided, though it can work allright.
Others: what others?
#17
Posted 2010-April-30, 09:26
gwnn, on Apr 30 2010, 05:21 AM, said:
jdonn, on Apr 29 2010, 11:23 PM, said:
I'm not happy to raise with AKx because I don't like to see partner ruff with the K and A but I'd raise too because everything else looks worse.
You mean he got 3 ruffs in dummy? I'm happy!
#19
Posted 2010-May-01, 10:04
2D is normal, I have a 6 carder, although 2D does not promise 6.
2S is a matter of partnership agreement, I prefer to have a single,
if I raise with only 3 card support
1NT - why?
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#20
Posted 2010-May-01, 10:06
dealmegold, on May 1 2010, 05:04 AM, said:
Hi,
it is quite common to play 2H over 2D as artificial, one purpose
is to find a 5-3 fit in responders major.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)