BBO Discussion Forums: What will it be? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

What will it be?

#41 User is offline   Jlall 

  • Follower of 655321
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,293
  • Joined: 2008-December-05
  • Interests:drinking, women, bridge...what else?

Posted 2010-January-02, 04:44

mohitz, on Dec 31 2009, 03:12 AM, said:

Jlall, on Dec 31 2009, 10:08 AM, said:

Actually pretty sure I learned a lot about this type of situation because Fred posted similar things like 5 years ago about this, and also because Hamman pretty much completely echos what Fred says if you ask about hands like this. Yay forums.

http://forums.bridge...wtopic=5976&hl=

Sorry gwnn! :) Btw, note that Jlall felt *very strongly* about doubling then! :)

Amazing, that was on Jan 1 2005, exactly 5 years ago haha. At least I've learned something!
0

#42 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2010-January-02, 04:51

bluecalm, on Jan 2 2010, 09:52 AM, said:

Would you guys trap with QJ7543 A 984 A53 after 1H opening from partner and 1S overcall from opponents vul against not?

Yes. I don't think that breaches Fred's "never trap Pass with a strong hand" principle, because it's not close to being a strong hand (though it was one before RHO bid spades).

Looking at it another way, if partner happens to pass it out with Kx KJxxx Ax xxxx, we haven't missed anything at all.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#43 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2010-January-02, 05:27

I would had auto-double, guess I need to rethink of this position
0

#44 User is offline   Hanoi5 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,083
  • Joined: 2006-August-31
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santiago, Chile
  • Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.

Posted 2010-January-02, 09:47

One thing I've learned in bridge (though I'm far from applying it) is that the only correct 'auto' is auto-think. Any other is doomed to fail at some point.

 wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:

Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the 3.


 rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:

Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win


My YouTube Channel
0

#45 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2010-January-02, 10:36

bluecalm, on Jan 2 2010, 03:52 AM, said:

Would you guys trap with QJ7543 A 984 A53 after 1H opening from partner and 1S overcall from opponents vul against not?

I am watching high level match from vugraph archives and member of one of the best partnerships (some says the best) in the world did trap with that.

If partner has that and we pass we get to defend 1 in a 5-0 fit rather than chase them to their 8 card diamond fit. And we have no game. Wtp?
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#46 User is offline   fred 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,610
  • Joined: 2003-February-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, USA

Posted 2010-January-02, 11:09

gnasher, on Jan 2 2010, 10:51 AM, said:

bluecalm, on Jan 2 2010, 09:52 AM, said:

Would you guys trap with QJ7543 A 984 A53 after 1H opening from partner and 1S overcall from opponents vul against not?

Yes. I don't think that breaches Fred's "never trap Pass with a strong hand" principle, because it's not close to being a strong hand (though it was one before RHO bid spades).

Looking at it another way, if partner happens to pass it out with Kx KJxxx Ax xxxx, we haven't missed anything at all.

Good post. Sorry I haven't so far explained what I mean by this principle yet (and that my original reference to it was so vague).

This is really all about opener, when he holds a weak notrump that is flawed for balancing purposes, not feeling that he MUST reopen with DBL in order to "protect partner in case he has a trap Pass" (because unless partner happens to have a trap Pass and a strong hand, you are likely to be better off not reopening at all with such a hand). By "weak notrump that is flawed for balancing" I mean all hands with 3 or 4 cards in the suit that was overcalled and some hands with 2 cards in that suit (this set of hands is harder to characterize - it becomes a judgment call, but you won't go far wrong if you follow Justin's "it is usually right to pass with Hx and a balanced min imo").

What I mean by a "strong hand" is a hand for which you *know* you have a game opposite a weak notrump. As gnasher points out, after an opponent overcalls 1S, this hand certainly does not qualify.

"Never" doesn't really mean "NEVER" - with some strong hands you simply don't have any choice other than to trap Pass since there is no other sensible call you could make. Note that the more cards you have in the overcaller's suit, the more likely it is that you have a hand like this. That increases the odds of your partner having shortness in their suit and, if he does, that changes the equation as far as his reopening strategy is concerned.

The vulnerability matters. If the opponents are vulnerable and you are not, a trap Pass with a strong hand becomes more attractive - even if partner Passes it out, the undoubled penalty may come close to compensating for your game. If you are vulnerable and the opponents are not, the reverse is obviously true.

IMO making a trap Pass when you have a good fit with partner's suit is almost always a really bad idea regardless of the strength of your hand. In my experience this is another common "mistake" that a lot of decent players make.

From what I have seen, even some liberal trap-Passers reopen with DBL far more often than they should. It is not rare to see some players take this to the extreme by claiming that they ALWAYS (seriously) reopen with DBL. IM(strong)O this is completely unplayable. I suspect you will not be able to find a single top-level player who advocates this strategy.

Fred Gitelman
Bridge Base Inc.
www.bridgebase.com
0

#47 User is offline   jonottawa 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,025
  • Joined: 2003-March-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ottawa, ON

Posted 2010-January-02, 18:35

fred, on Jan 2 2010, 05:09 PM, said:

It is not rare to see some players take this to the extreme by claiming that they ALWAYS (seriously) reopen with DBL.

Well, usually they're 'claiming' this in committee after pard broke tempo and passed and they reopened with a cheesebox.
"Maybe we should all get together and buy Kaitlyn a box set of "All in the Family" for Chanukah. Archie didn't think he was a racist, the problem was with all the chinks, dagos, niggers, kikes, etc. ruining the country." ~ barmar
0

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users