(3♦) - pass - (3NT) - dbl*
(pass) - pass (4♦) - pass?
* t/o diamonds
Two quick questions
1) Should dbl be a t/o or is just "values" better
2) Should pass be forcing here?
Page 1 of 1
Does this set up a FP for you
#2
Posted 2010-January-01, 15:59
I think a forcing pass here makes sense but with an unknown p I would assume non-forcing.
If pass is non-forcing, dbl is t/o.
I just got a great idea: if pass is forcing, dbl could be played as t/o with longer spades than hearts.
If pass is non-forcing, dbl is t/o.
I just got a great idea: if pass is forcing, dbl could be played as t/o with longer spades than hearts.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#3
Posted 2010-January-01, 17:35
if pass is forcing double is best used as " we are slaughting this"
. Wich is the normal meaning if pass is frocing.
This is a rare sequence so you dhould just do what your meta-agreements say. Mines would be awful here
This is a rare sequence so you dhould just do what your meta-agreements say. Mines would be awful here
#4
Posted 2010-January-01, 18:09
Fluffy, on Jan 2 2010, 12:35 AM, said:
This is a rare sequence so you dhould just do what your meta-agreements say.
Our meta-rule says that this is a FP situation, for a t/o double has been converted.
However, we weren't 100% sure that such "psyche-revealing" doubles should not set up a forcing pass. How off the wall is this? Would people play a FP in analogous but lower level psyche-reveal auctions?
(1♣) - dbl - (1♠) - dbl
(2♣) - ?
#5
Posted 2010-January-02, 05:21
yeah, you don't double 1♠ on nothing, I think you are forcing to play 2♠ unless you prefer to double 2♣. Playing the other way makes sense as well, but I don't like exceptions.
MY father and his partner used to play some funny thing: forcing passes only happen at even levels, so at the 2&4 level pass is foricng but at the 3&5 level pass is not forcing.
MY father and his partner used to play some funny thing: forcing passes only happen at even levels, so at the 2&4 level pass is foricng but at the 3&5 level pass is not forcing.
#6
Posted 2010-January-02, 05:24
Hi,
#1 values
#2 no
With kind regards
Marlowe
#1 values
#2 no
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#7
Posted 2010-January-02, 05:30
Ant590, on Jan 1 2010, 07:09 PM, said:
<snip>
However, we weren't 100% sure that such "psyche-revealing" doubles should not set up a forcing pass.
<snip>
However, we weren't 100% sure that such "psyche-revealing" doubles should not set up a forcing pass.
<snip>
Who said, that 3NT was psych?
3NT is certainly a common psych bid, but sometimes you will have reasonable
diamond support, feeling that 3NT has a reasonable chance, but dont want to
play 3NTx.
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#8
Posted 2010-January-02, 16:36
I think that whether you categorize the run to 4♦ as "psych revealing" or not is irrelevant. Partner passed 3NTX, so you are now in a forcing pass.
"Half the people you know are below average." - Steven Wright
Page 1 of 1

Help
