Help
Scoring: MP
(P) 1♠ (P) 1NT
(P) 3♠ (P) ?
1. Do you agree with 1NT = semi-forcing?
2. What now?
Page 1 of 1
Aces and Spaces
#1
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 595
- Joined: 2008-April-30
- Location:Pleasanton, CA, US
Posted 2009-November-21, 23:15
(P) 1♠ (P) 1NT
(P) 3♠ (P) ?
1. Do you agree with 1NT = semi-forcing?
2. What now?
#2
- Follower of 655321
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 3,293
- Joined: 2008-December-05
- Interests:drinking, women, bridge...what else?
Posted 2009-November-21, 23:26
1N is fine unless you open sound.
I bid 4C now, what else would I do?
I bid 4C now, what else would I do?
#3
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,962
- Joined: 2007-September-14
- Location:Australia
- Interests:The Universe, Traveling, Squash, and Scandinavia.
Posted 2009-November-22, 02:24
Agree with Justin.
- Andy -
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#4
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 584
- Joined: 2008-November-27
Posted 2009-November-22, 02:46
Agree with 4♣ now , but would not bid 1NT, this is a GF hand for me.
#5
- Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 9,586
- Joined: 2005-September-21
- Gender:Male
- Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
- Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor
Posted 2009-November-22, 08:20
yep
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.
#6
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 595
- Joined: 2008-April-30
- Location:Pleasanton, CA, US
Posted 2009-November-22, 09:20
If you bid 4♣, pd bids 4♦. If over that you bid 4♥ (not last train), partner bids 4♠.
#7
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,208
- Joined: 2007-July-01
- Gender:Male
- Location:Michigan
- Interests:Science, Sports
Posted 2009-November-22, 09:35
MarkDean, on Nov 22 2009, 10:20 AM, said:
If you bid 4♣, pd bids 4♦. If over that you bid 4♥ (not last train), partner bids 4♠.
I keep going. I have THREE ACES!!! This is the best slam hand I could have on the auction so far, unless maybe I had some better spots and a third trump? Any of those might have made me GF this though, especially the 3rd trump.
I can totally envision us needing to play a diamond slam, btw. Can I bid 6♦ choice of slams? IDK
Kevin Fay
#8
- Csaba the Hutt
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 13,027
- Joined: 2006-June-16
- Gender:Male
- Interests:bye
Posted 2009-November-22, 09:41
4♦ empathetic splinter.
if somehow you don't play them yet, you have to bid 4♣ and 4nt after 4♦.
if somehow you don't play them yet, you have to bid 4♣ and 4nt after 4♦.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#9
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,814
- Joined: 2009-July-23
- Gender:Male
- Location:New Orleans
Posted 2009-November-22, 10:08
MarkDean, on Nov 22 2009, 12:15 AM, said:
Scoring: MP
(P) 1♠ (P) 1NT
(P) 3♠ (P) ?
1. Do you agree with 1NT = semi-forcing?
2. What now?
well the choice look like 3NT or 4♣ [is anyone really going to play this as natural?]. 3NT is only a consideration because it is MP but IMO you need to qbid 4♣ and hope partner has a no wasted values singleton♦
"Tell me of your home world, Usul"
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#10
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,987
- Joined: 2009-February-15
Posted 2009-November-22, 10:58
I would not bid 1NT, I accept that we will sometimes get to a poor game but this hand has too much potential.
Agree with 4C now.
Agree with 4C now.
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
#11
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,502
- Joined: 2007-December-22
Posted 2009-November-22, 16:45
I wouldn't have bid 1NT.
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
#12
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 11,213
- Joined: 2005-March-18
- Gender:Male
Posted 2009-November-24, 08:08
#1 well, we open sound, but due to lack of alternatives, 1NT is
fine, but I am used to play a forcing NT.
#2 4C, since p showed 6, I dont promise 3 card support.
I wont force to slam, but I make a move.
With kind regards
Marlowe
fine, but I am used to play a forcing NT.
#2 4C, since p showed 6, I dont promise 3 card support.
I wont force to slam, but I make a move.
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#13
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 11,213
- Joined: 2005-March-18
- Gender:Male
Posted 2009-November-24, 08:09
MarkDean, on Nov 22 2009, 10:20 AM, said:
If you bid 4♣, pd bids 4♦. If over that you bid 4♥ (not last train), partner bids 4♠.
Hi,
I am giving up.
I made a serious push toward slam, my bidding showed 2KC, so
thats it.
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#14
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 589
- Joined: 2005-November-02
- Location:Moldova
Posted 2009-November-24, 09:22
Obvious to continue over 4♠.
Slam is playable opposite some 2♠ rebids eg KJxxxxx Kxx Ax x, so I can hardly give up after a 3♠ rebid.
Slam is playable opposite some 2♠ rebids eg KJxxxxx Kxx Ax x, so I can hardly give up after a 3♠ rebid.
#15
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 14,017
- Joined: 2005-June-15
- Gender:Male
- Location:Canada
- Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.
Posted 2009-November-24, 10:55
For those who wouldn't have bid 1N....what would you have bid instead?
I mean, I can understand how one might consider a hand with 3 Aces to be gf in value...but bridge is a dialogue, not a monologue. If we bid 2♦, partner will be encouraged if holding, say, Qx or QJx...holdings that in fact are not upgradable at all. It is a useful rule, in constructive bidding, that when we make a 2/1 natural new suit gf call, we should have at least 5th round control in the suit.
If I were going to 2/1, it would be via 2♣. As it is, I am with the 1N crowd. That way, I am not distorting suit quality or length...and am not making a serious underbid unless playing Roth-Stone
I mean, I can understand how one might consider a hand with 3 Aces to be gf in value...but bridge is a dialogue, not a monologue. If we bid 2♦, partner will be encouraged if holding, say, Qx or QJx...holdings that in fact are not upgradable at all. It is a useful rule, in constructive bidding, that when we make a 2/1 natural new suit gf call, we should have at least 5th round control in the suit.
If I were going to 2/1, it would be via 2♣. As it is, I am with the 1N crowd. That way, I am not distorting suit quality or length...and am not making a serious underbid unless playing Roth-Stone
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
Page 1 of 1