wtp or non-wtp
#1
Posted 2009-October-21, 05:47
xxx
AKQxxxx
AJx
-
1♥-1♠-p-p
?
The guy I kibbed maneuvered this hand very nicely and should have gotten a nice result. How would you bid it?
edit: I don't actually agree the way the guy tried but he was definitely rewarded
George Carlin
#2
Posted 2009-October-21, 06:01
#3
Posted 2009-October-21, 06:10
#4
Posted 2009-October-21, 06:25
"gwnn" said:
hanp does not always mean literally what he writes.
#5
Posted 2009-October-21, 06:46
I'll bid 4♥. At first I was going to say 3♥ is fine, but the more I think about it the less I think so. Partner will never know a diamond honor is huge but a club honor is useless, so I think it's pointless to make some invitational bid and expect him to make a reasonable evaluation.
#6
Posted 2009-October-21, 06:48
However, I was wondering if a re-opening double will be better.
Partner is most unlikely to have a penalty pass and will surely bid. We then follow up with a cheapest bid in hearts? We need to know where partner's values are to determine right level...
#7
Posted 2009-October-21, 07:34
"gwnn" said:
hanp does not always mean literally what he writes.
#8
Posted 2009-October-21, 07:46
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#9
Posted 2009-October-21, 07:57
jdonn, on Oct 21 2009, 07:46 AM, said:
I'll bid 4♥. At first I was going to say 3♥ is fine, but the more I think about it the less I think so. Partner will never know a diamond honor is huge but a club honor is useless, so I think it's pointless to make some invitational bid and expect him to make a reasonable evaluation.
If you are going to game why don't you try for slam and self-splinter
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#10
Posted 2009-October-21, 08:04
I also don't think 4♥ has a great tactical upside to it, so overall I think it's just an overbid.
2♥ is just nonsense though.
#12
Posted 2009-October-21, 08:34
maggieb, on Oct 21 2009, 09:04 AM, said:
I also don't think 4♥ has a great tactical upside to it, so overall I think it's just an overbid.
2♥ is just nonsense though.
You may be right, regarding 3♥/4♥ and missing games. But I think there is a fair tactical upside to 4♥, as there seems to be a reasonable chance the overcaller has a good hand with spades and clubs.
#13
Posted 2009-October-21, 08:57
jdonn, on Oct 21 2009, 09:34 AM, said:
maggieb, on Oct 21 2009, 09:04 AM, said:
I also don't think 4♥ has a great tactical upside to it, so overall I think it's just an overbid.
2♥ is just nonsense though.
You may be right, regarding 3♥/4♥ and missing games. But I think there is a fair tactical upside to 4♥, as there seems to be a reasonable chance the overcaller has a good hand with spades and clubs.
Sure, but he didn't bid Michaels, so he probably has at most 4 clubs. Unless his partner has 6, I'd say that any number of clubs they bid is likely to be bad for them, especially since I wasn't even particularly convinced I could make 3♥ or 4♥. Consequently I considered the "avoiding a club save" factor to be more or less a wash.
#14
Posted 2009-October-21, 10:21
I'm not going to drive myself nuts with permutations about what the other three players might or might not have, which is tertiary at best, and irrelevant at worst.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.

Help
