How do you interpret this auction? LOL
1♥ - 3♣ - P - P
3♦ - 3♠ - P - 4♠
5♦ - P - 5♥ - 5♠
P - P - 6♥ - 6♠
X - All Pass
Wth is going on here? Can you construct any hands that fit this auction?
(Result at the time was -1)
Page 1 of 1
What the &*%# is going on here?
#2
Posted 2009-June-03, 19:58
Let's think of it one hand at a time.
Dealer: Most likely some extreme red suiter (say 1660, 12-7-7-13 remaining)
2nd seat: Some extreme and weak black suiter (say 5017, 7-7-6-6 remaining)
3rd seat: Probably a fairly weak hand with club length and doesnt want to bid hearts first due to fear of getting taken for 500 (say 2425, 5-3-4-1 remaining)
4th seat: Hand has most of the points in spades, can't see much defence to 6♥ and was initially walking the dog (5341)
This makes me think of a hand such as:
I'm not saying the bidding would be correct, but seems like the most sane construction I can think of.
Dealer: Most likely some extreme red suiter (say 1660, 12-7-7-13 remaining)
2nd seat: Some extreme and weak black suiter (say 5017, 7-7-6-6 remaining)
3rd seat: Probably a fairly weak hand with club length and doesnt want to bid hearts first due to fear of getting taken for 500 (say 2425, 5-3-4-1 remaining)
4th seat: Hand has most of the points in spades, can't see much defence to 6♥ and was initially walking the dog (5341)
This makes me think of a hand such as:
I'm not saying the bidding would be correct, but seems like the most sane construction I can think of.
Wayne Somerville
#3
Posted 2009-June-04, 03:23
Something like Wayne(Manudude)'s example, but I South's bidding seems inconsistent. He passes over 3♠ and then bids hearts twice voluntarily later.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#4
Posted 2009-June-04, 06:45
Maybe E-W had agreed that they play michales 3♣=5♣+5♠+ NF as suggested in Revision club.
And West forgot the meaning, but after 3♠ remembered...
And West forgot the meaning, but after 3♠ remembered...
Seeking input from anyone who doesn't frequently "wtp", "Lol" or post to merely "Agree with ..." --sathyab
#5
Posted 2009-June-04, 06:52
If I held
x
AKJxxx
AKTxxx
---
I wouldn't rebid 3♦ at my second turn to bid - I would rebid 4♦ - maybe 5♦. Even 6♦ is not unreasonable. So the North hand cannot be this strong or this distributional - one or the other.
This hand is a favorite for 12 tricks opposite xxx xxxx xxxx xx.
x
AKJxxx
AKTxxx
---
I wouldn't rebid 3♦ at my second turn to bid - I would rebid 4♦ - maybe 5♦. Even 6♦ is not unreasonable. So the North hand cannot be this strong or this distributional - one or the other.
This hand is a favorite for 12 tricks opposite xxx xxxx xxxx xx.
#6
Posted 2009-June-04, 10:38
ArtK78, on Jun 4 2009, 07:52 AM, said:
This hand is a favorite for 12 tricks opposite xxx xxxx xxxx xx.
Don't play me for the perfect 0-count partner, I never have it.
(I completely agree with your point of course)
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
#7
Posted 2009-June-04, 10:49
I realise what you are saying about the N hand being way too strong for 3D(honestly, I agree), but I can't think of a single hand which has just got better when its become more likely partner is nearly broke, which makes me think he just underbid (quite severely) the first time.
I also admit that south's actions are pretty strange (the passing 3S part anyway). The "voluntary" heart bids might not be so voluntary though, 5H would be a simple preference, then read N's pass of 5S as forcing and so bid 6H with no defence.
ps. I wouldn't pass 3D with xxx xxxx xxxx xx.
I also admit that south's actions are pretty strange (the passing 3S part anyway). The "voluntary" heart bids might not be so voluntary though, 5H would be a simple preference, then read N's pass of 5S as forcing and so bid 6H with no defence.
ps. I wouldn't pass 3D with xxx xxxx xxxx xx.
Wayne Somerville
Page 1 of 1

Help
