BBO Discussion Forums: Fascinating - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Fascinating

Poll: How would you consider (41 member(s) have cast votes)

How would you consider

  1. 6 hearts (21 votes [51.22%])

    Percentage of vote: 51.22%

  2. Pass (1 votes [2.44%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.44%

  3. 6 clubs (13 votes [31.71%])

    Percentage of vote: 31.71%

  4. 5 hearts (6 votes [14.63%])

    Percentage of vote: 14.63%

  5. 5 diamonds (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#21 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2009-May-31, 07:51

What would 5NT mean?
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#22 User is offline   dake50 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,211
  • Joined: 2006-April-22

Posted 2009-May-31, 11:56

Is pass then pull option ON? Ie is this an agreed forcing pass? Then I like pass then 6C over dbl/5H/5S. Holy smoke if partner 6S/6H.

With no forcing pass, bet C-void is slam difference so 6C.
0

#23 User is offline   hackenbush 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 41
  • Joined: 2006-August-15

Posted 2009-May-31, 13:17

6. If I bid 6, I'm not sure I trust partner to avoid the grand without K. I would much rather have a source of tricks already in hand for 6. I saw a similar hand the other day:
AQT4K852-AKQ73.
You're in 3rd seat and the auction goes 1-P-2-4-P-5-?
This would be a better candidate for a 6-lvl cue. P/pull is possible, but you might not get another chance to show a hand this good if one of the opps bid 6.
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users