Help
*now* we're cooking
Page 1 of 1
go troops, go!!!
#1
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,951
- Joined: 2003-September-07
- Gender:Male
- Interests:Bridge, poker, politics
Posted 2009-March-24, 15:57
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)
#2
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 17,289
- Joined: 2005-January-08
- Gender:Male
- Location:Tulsa, Oklahoma
- Interests:Art, music
Posted 2009-March-24, 17:27
Quote
*now* we're cooking
Cooking what, quiche?
Quote
Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office, Obama said the threat of al-Qaida and its terrorist affiliates has not gone away. As a consequence, he said, "it's important for us to stay on the offensive." Yet he emphasized that the U.S, working with its coalition partners, cannot simply win the war militarily.
"Real men don't lose wars" - Dick "The Bastard" Cheney
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."
#3
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,987
- Joined: 2009-February-15
Posted 2009-March-24, 17:29
What is this thread about? I looked at the news article but didn't see anything new and I don't understand the cooking reference. Is the title sarcastic or serious? I'm lost.
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
#4
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,030
- Joined: 2008-August-08
- Interests:Attorney, writer, entertainer.<br><br>Great close-up magicians we have known: Shoot Ogawa, Whit Haydn, Bill Malone, David Williamson, Dai Vernon, Michael Skinner, Jay Sankey, Brian Gillis, Eddie Fechter, Simon Lovell, Carl Andrews.
Posted 2009-March-24, 17:32
Gotta win the peace, too.
1. LSAT tutor for rent.
Call me Desdinova...Eternal Light
C. It's the nexus of the crisis and the origin of storms.
IV: ace 333: pot should be game, idk
e: "Maybe God remembered how cute you were as a carrot."
Call me Desdinova...Eternal Light
C. It's the nexus of the crisis and the origin of storms.
IV: ace 333: pot should be game, idk
e: "Maybe God remembered how cute you were as a carrot."
#5
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 17,289
- Joined: 2005-January-08
- Gender:Male
- Location:Tulsa, Oklahoma
- Interests:Art, music
Posted 2009-March-24, 17:45
Quote
What is this thread about?
Tetosterone.
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."
#6
- - - T98765432 AQT8
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 15,085
- Joined: 2005-June-23
- Gender:Male
- Location:Las Vegas, NV
Posted 2009-March-24, 18:36
If the point is that we should not go in half-assed if we are to go in at all, I agree. Beyond that I'm almost as lost as han.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
#7
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 18,348
- Joined: 2003-October-07
- Gender:Male
Posted 2009-March-24, 19:36
The Pakistan/Afghan war is tough. Clearly we are never going in full force, never.
How we define victory, our goals or success seems cloudy at best.
In the meantime Military families suffer.
If the extreme options are:
1) 500,000 troops with full draft no college exemption
2) full pull out
3) other?
"In the coming days, he is expected to announce his broader rethinking of U.S. strategy and goals in the war, including changed tactics and lowered expectations for the difficult conflict."
How we define victory, our goals or success seems cloudy at best.
In the meantime Military families suffer.
If the extreme options are:
1) 500,000 troops with full draft no college exemption
2) full pull out
3) other?
"In the coming days, he is expected to announce his broader rethinking of U.S. strategy and goals in the war, including changed tactics and lowered expectations for the difficult conflict."
#8
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 17,289
- Joined: 2005-January-08
- Gender:Male
- Location:Tulsa, Oklahoma
- Interests:Art, music
Posted 2009-March-24, 20:44
Big Whoopee. We are sending in 17K more troops into an area where we have no strategy, no objectives and no chance of a military "win".
In my book, that is nothing over which to rejoice.
In my book, that is nothing over which to rejoice.
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."
#9
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 18,348
- Joined: 2003-October-07
- Gender:Male
Posted 2009-March-24, 22:46
Winstonm, on Mar 24 2009, 09:44 PM, said:
Big Whoopee. We are sending in 17K more troops into an area where we have no strategy, no objectives and no chance of a military "win".
In my book, that is nothing over which to rejoice.
In my book, that is nothing over which to rejoice.
Winston:
My understanding, perhaps wrong, is our objective is we do not want attacks launched from Afghan/paki that result in 3000 dead in USA homeland.
This may be impossible.....given...cheap nukes...super cheap bio
#10
- The Abbess
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 17,401
- Joined: 2004-April-22
- Gender:Female
- Location:Odense, Denmark
- Interests:History, languages
Posted 2009-March-25, 03:48
Hey Winston, you read "real men don't eat quiche"? It's a great book!
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#11
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,080
- Joined: 2005-May-16
- Gender:Male
Posted 2009-March-25, 07:49
mike777, on Mar 24 2009, 11:46 PM, said:
Winstonm, on Mar 24 2009, 09:44 PM, said:
Big Whoopee. We are sending in 17K more troops into an area where we have no strategy, no objectives and no chance of a military "win".
In my book, that is nothing over which to rejoice.
In my book, that is nothing over which to rejoice.
Winston:
My understanding, perhaps wrong, is our objective is we do not want attacks launched from Afghan/paki that result in 3000 dead in USA homeland.
This may be impossible.....given...cheap nukes...super cheap bio
Whats a few more (hundred, thousand, million, billion) deaths in a world where we have so many to spare?
Say that the US sent troops to Darfur to protect the genocide victims and to punish the Sudanese government for their transgressions.....what? sovereignty issues you say?
How about the US sent troops to the Brazilian rainforest to stop poachers and subsistence farmers from destroying the rainforest eco-system (and the earth's lungs as it were).
Or maybe they send their divisions into Colombia to root out the drug lords and destroy the coca plants in the fields?
I guess that someone has to protect the opium supply in Afghanistan...
The Grand Design, reflected in the face of Chaos...it's a fluke!
#12
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 11,201
- Joined: 2005-March-18
- Gender:Male
Posted 2009-March-25, 11:01
mike777, on Mar 24 2009, 11:46 PM, said:
Winstonm, on Mar 24 2009, 09:44 PM, said:
Big Whoopee. We are sending in 17K more troops into an area where we have no strategy, no objectives and no chance of a military "win".
In my book, that is nothing over which to rejoice.
In my book, that is nothing over which to rejoice.
Winston:
My understanding, perhaps wrong, is our objective is we do not want attacks launched from Afghan/paki that result in 3000 dead in USA homeland.
This may be impossible.....given...cheap nukes...super cheap bio
If Pakistan is lost, we are speaking about real nukes
(oppossite the "real" nukes of Irak) in the hand of
peoble, which may or may not use those weapons,
and some of those wont care, if they die in the process
of using those
So, we dont talk about only 3000 dead in USA homeland,
we talk about a serious worldwide thread.
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Page 1 of 1