BBO Discussion Forums: (1x)-1y-(p)-2x-(p)-3y - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

(1x)-1y-(p)-2x-(p)-3y

#1 User is online   kgr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,448
  • Joined: 2003-April-11

Posted 2008-November-22, 03:55

eg.:
(1)-1-(p)-2
What is the minimum you normally have for 2?
What is the minimum the overcaller needs to bid 3 or anything else?
If overcaller rebids 2 what is the minimum for his partner to bid 3?
(1)-1-(p)-2
(p)-2-(p)-3
0

#2 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-November-22, 11:59

For 2C: mild invite.
For 2S: no game interest opposite any invite.
Other bid: natural, game interest opposite invite.
For bidding on after 2S: Better than invite.

With invite I mean a hand that would be invitational opposite an opening.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#3 User is online   kgr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,448
  • Joined: 2003-April-11

Posted 2008-November-22, 18:57

han, on Nov 22 2008, 07:59 PM, said:

For 2C: mild invite.
For 2S: no game interest opposite any invite.
Other bid: natural, game interest opposite invite.
For bidding on after 2S: Better than invite.

With invite I mean a hand that would be invitational opposite an opening.

...To bid anything else then 2 you will need a good opening?
0

#4 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2008-November-24, 01:50

yes
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#5 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2008-November-24, 05:06

I'm sure many of us would bid 2 on

AKJxx
QJxx
x
xxx

which doesn't really constitute a "good opening"
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#6 User is online   kgr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,448
  • Joined: 2003-April-11

Posted 2008-November-24, 05:44

Scoring: IMP

P-(1C)-1S-(P)
2C-(P)-3S-(P)
4S-All Pass
 
What do you think of this bidding?
 
If South only bids 2S iso 3S, should North then re-invite with 3S and should S accept?
 
(I tried to reconstruct the hands like it happened at the table, but I can't imagine that I didn't bid a weak 2S with the S hand. So the hands were probably not exactly as given. I know I had 8/9 HCP and 12 distribution pts. So assume you play strong jump overcalls and you started with 1S)
0

#7 User is online   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,909
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-November-25, 06:32

#1 To make the cue, you need basically the same
values, you would need for an invite opposite a
opening.
In other words, if you would invite facing a opener,
make the cue, otherwise not.

#2 A min opener.
The 3S simply says, partner I have a king more than
min, i.e. a min. opener, is this enough?

#3 Sound opening values.
Basically, you want to ask partner do you have a near
opener or complete garbage.
...................................................................................

#1 The cue is fine, in the given instance the cue promises a fit.

#2 I am not sure, I like 3S, facing a passed partner chances for
game are remote, you will only make game, if the hands fit
well, if you want to make a move (reasonable), bid 3C.
Since partner is a passed hand, 3S should promise sound
opening values, since partner may stretch to make the cue.

#3 Bidding 4S is fine, you have super maximum for the bidding,
keeping in mind, that partner has to play you for far less.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#8 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2008-November-25, 06:56

i think 1 is much better than 2 on your hand, you don't need to have agreed SJO to bid it.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users