Minor Transfer Pre-Accept
#1
Posted 2008-November-21, 16:57
♠ Q2
♥ KQ76
♦ AJ6
♣ K965
Opps are passing. Your pard responds 2nt, transfer to ♦
Assuming that you play 3♣ as pre-accept without any other discussion, do you bid 3♣ or 3♦ in response?
I thought pre-accepts are specifically showing a good fit for the transferred minor, not the quality of the rest of the hand (as opposed to major transfer SUPER accepts, which are generally not only on a 4card fit but also a max hand). So with AJx support I would bid 3♣ preaccept. It appears that I'm wrong, can you comment?
#2
Posted 2008-November-21, 17:05
#3
Posted 2008-November-21, 17:35
Partner may have a reasonable hand for his transfer. He needs to know if his 6 or 7 card suit is producing tricks. If he has KQxxxx and out he will not bid a game. But if he has more, such as a spade honor in addition to his good diamonds, he will bid on if he knows you have the ♦A.
On occasion, you might get to 3NT off the spade suit by preaccepting on this hand. But they still have to take their tricks before you take yours.
By the way, it is my experience that most better players have changed over to bidding the suit with a preacceptance and making the intervening call without the preacceptance.
#4
Posted 2008-November-21, 17:48
My rule for accepting a minor suit transfer is that opener needs Aces and Kings, as well as a fitting honor in partner's suit. With only slow cards outside, opener just bids partner's minor.
#5
Posted 2008-November-21, 17:51
#6
Posted 2008-November-21, 18:30
- hrothgar
#7
Posted 2008-November-21, 18:32
So this would be a hand like:
♠J98x
♥AKx
♦Kxx
♣Axx
After a diamond transfer I can count nine top tricks if partner has ♦AQxxxx.
If partner has Art's hand (six diamonds to two top honors and an outside card) that leaves partner with something like 8-9 hcp and a six-card suit. That's a game force opposite a strong 1NT.
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#8
Posted 2008-November-21, 21:40
#9
Posted 2008-November-21, 22:59
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#10
Posted 2008-November-22, 11:57
ArtK78, on Nov 21 2008, 11:35 PM, said:
By the way, it is my experience that most better players have changed over to bidding the suit with a preacceptance and making the intervening call without the preacceptance.
Can someone please make the case for this? I've seen it both ways, and can't really convince myself either way is clearly superior. Seems either way gains with one responder hand, loses with another, but it's hard to see which "wrong" way is less damaging.
#11
Posted 2008-November-22, 12:01
- hrothgar
#13
Posted 2008-November-23, 03:10
#14
Posted 2008-November-25, 08:37
Quote
partner will bid 3Nt with KQ 6th and K of S. He will bid staymna with 4S.
So unless partner Jxx of S + (spades are 4/4 or you get a non S lead) game will not make.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."

Help
