World Record?
#1
Posted 2008-May-29, 20:44
♠AK1043
♥AKJ
♦AK763
♣
IMPs all white. World Class partner and opps.
#4
Posted 2008-May-29, 20:49
Anyway, I will end up in at least 4♦ no matter what... somehow this will at least avoid the world record...
#7
Posted 2008-May-29, 21:04
1♠+6
I don't mean to call attention to what I thought was a terrible bid by a player who I obviously respect. I just thought this was taking an idea way too far. Was wondering if anyone shared his philosophy about strong 2-suiters.
#8
Posted 2008-May-29, 21:10
#9
Posted 2008-May-29, 21:21
Those that play Bergen (or other preemptive 3♠) have chances to be saved here as perhaps PD has junk with 4♠ and can bid 3.
Those that play 1NTF and constructive raises may be saved if PD has 3 trumps and 4 or a bad 5 hcp and starts with the forcing NT, which the intention of signing off in 2♠ hoping to steal the hand.
However, those are too many BIG if's for me to not open 2♣ instantly.
Passed out with a slam is a good possibility, and especially vs opps, that need something to balance and force to the 2 level.
#10
Posted 2008-May-29, 21:24
#11
Posted 2008-May-29, 21:28
inquiry, on May 29 2008, 10:10 PM, said:
What auction would lead to that difficulty on this hand?
#12
Posted 2008-May-29, 21:29
kfay, on May 29 2008, 10:04 PM, said:
I think he meant world record for over tricks, unless that '+6" means making six instead of six over tricks.
#13
Posted 2008-May-29, 21:44
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
Our ultimate goal on defense is to know by trick two or three everyone's hand at the table. -- Mike777
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#14
Posted 2008-May-30, 00:35
kfay, on May 29 2008, 09:44 PM, said:
♠AK1043
♥AKJ
♦AK763
♣
IMPs all white. World Class partner and opps.
seriously.........i open 2c wtp.....too much only 3 losers.
the rest of the hand maybe but 2c=100% with any wc partner I play with.
If wc partner prefers i open one spade...npp....just tell me so I can file it.. ty.....
lol I only wish..wish this is the worst bid or play I ever make with a wc pard....
#15
Posted 2008-May-30, 01:00
But, I wouldn't worry too much about seeing somebody experiment with a 1♠ opening in a friendly online game - if you can't try stuff under those conditions, when can you?
#16
Posted 2008-May-30, 01:01
#17
Posted 2008-May-30, 01:13
kfay, on May 29 2008, 10:04 PM, said:
1♠+6
I don't mean to call attention to what I thought was a terrible bid by a player who I obviously respect. I just thought this was taking an idea way too far. Was wondering if anyone shared his philosophy about strong 2-suiters.
was he playing 2/1 with forcing 1NT and constructive
raises?
If he did, the bid is not completly out of this world,
because partner will bid, if he holds 4HCP and a spade
fit, but it is risky.
With kind regads
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#18
Posted 2008-May-30, 02:30
I'm slowly being trained out of it after scoring 1C+5, but without that how could I have had the amusement on another hand of being protected out of 1D into a making slam?
#19
Posted 2008-May-30, 02:36
I don't like passing 1M with a sexy 3 or 4 count particularly NV. That said, this does (barely) look like a bit thick for 1♠.
George Carlin
#20
Posted 2008-May-30, 08:50

Help
