BBO Discussion Forums: Get wet feet? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Get wet feet? (no offense meant)

#1 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-March-24, 22:40

Scoring: IMP


1C - (Dbl) - 1NT - (2C)
??
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#2 User is offline   655321 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,502
  • Joined: 2007-December-22

Posted 2008-March-24, 22:48

5♣
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
0

#3 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2008-March-24, 23:47

3♣. I didn't like the choice of the player who held this hand, although more clubs might prompt a call from hyper aggressive opps. We have a lot of bits and pieces that are useful for defense.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#4 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2008-March-25, 00:22

Just an FYI, han messed this hand up a little. The opening bid was PASS. You are w/r and you opened in 2nd seat (you are not red/white).
0

#5 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2008-March-25, 00:24

pclayton, on Mar 25 2008, 12:47 AM, said:

3♣. I didn't like the choice of the player who held this hand, although more clubs might prompt a call from hyper aggressive opps. We have a lot of bits and pieces that are useful for defense.

Phil,

I think given that this hand is a big double fit (partner has at most 3-3 majors), it is far more common that both 4C and 3M being makers than that 3M and 4C are going down. So I think it is an error to be willing to sell to 3M by the opponents.
0

#6 User is offline   rogerclee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,214
  • Joined: 2007-December-16
  • Location:Pasadena, CA

Posted 2008-March-25, 01:15

4♣.
0

#7 User is offline   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,715
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2008-March-25, 01:39

This is a great hand for non-forcing gerber. 4♣.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#8 User is offline   benlessard 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,465
  • Joined: 2006-January-07
  • Location:Montreal Canada
  • Interests:All games. i really mean all of them.

Posted 2008-March-25, 01:52

Quote

I think given that this hand is a big double fit (partner has at most 3-3 majors), it is far more common that both 4C and 3M being makers than that 3M and 4C are going down. So I think it is an error to be willing to sell to 3M by the opponents.


Agree 100%
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
0

#9 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2008-March-25, 02:24

With something like QTx, KJxx,Qxxx,xx my pd had surely bid 1 NT over 1 Club X, so I don't see why he must have at most 3-3 in the majors.

But he surely has honours in the majors, so I just bid 3 Club and leave the final descission to him.
Kind Regards

Roland

Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#10 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2008-March-25, 03:36

awm, on Mar 25 2008, 07:39 AM, said:

This is a great hand for non-forcing gerber. 4♣.

I give up, agree with Adam. Even if he uses the G word he knows how to use it.
BridgeGod: my personal website with interactive problems and articles
0

#11 User is offline   andy_h 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,962
  • Joined: 2007-September-14
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:The Universe, Traveling, Squash, and Scandinavia.

Posted 2008-March-25, 04:38

4C
- Andy -

We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
0

#12 User is offline   Cascade 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Yellows
  • Posts: 6,772
  • Joined: 2003-July-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Zealand
  • Interests:Juggling, Unicycling

Posted 2008-March-25, 04:52

3♣ for better or worse 4♣ would be a better hand for us.
Wayne Burrows

I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon

#13 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2008-March-25, 05:08

They got dbl fit in the majors and our 5♣ may be a phantom... hum... I'll just bid a confident 3♣ for the moment. Will sell out to 3M.
0

#14 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2008-March-25, 06:36

None taken.

4♣.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users