I opened 1♦ in third seat. LHO doubles.
He is holding:
♠ A K Q 5 3
♥ K T 9 4
♦ -
♣ A Q T 7
His Partner bids 1♥ holding:
♠ T 7
♥ J 7 6 5 3
♦ K Q 9 8 4
♣ 3
I bid 2♦(had 6) and LHO now bids 2♠, which his partner passes. Mr X had nothing better to do than to berate his partner, telling him that "pass" was not an option. I disagree. I would have understood that we had a misfit.
What I am really getting at is this:
Why not "support" partner('s bid) (instead of "berating" him)?
If he really really really wanted to force his partner to bid, why not bid ♦ after the ♥ bid - implying the suit fit?
What did he want his partner to bid?
Repeat his scrawny ♥s?
3♠, with his doubleton? (How will Mr "Advanced" know that his partner has a 2 5 distribution and not a 3 4 distribution?) (declarer made 2♠+1)
I think Mr "Advanced" should have either shown the ♥ support, or cuebid ♦.
Also, I think Mr "Advanced" should not leave the table in a huff after the hand, because, IMHO, his intermediate partner was not to blame.
End of rant.

Help
