since I'm bored...
#1
Posted 2008-January-08, 12:25
AKxx
Axxx
Axxx
x
1♦-(4♠)-p-(p)
??
What call would you make?
What are the logical alternatives, if any?
#2
Posted 2008-January-08, 12:35
logical alternative could be a penalty X.
George Carlin
#3
Posted 2008-January-08, 12:44
Likewise, if my partner had doubled, it would be take-out. He did not although he is short in spades.
Give me 1444 instead and it's a different ballgame. I'd double now.
Roland
#4
Posted 2008-January-08, 12:46
#5
Posted 2008-January-08, 12:49
#6
Posted 2008-January-08, 13:51
2) No alternatives
#7
Posted 2008-January-08, 15:31
jdonn, on Jan 9 2008, 03:46 AM, said:
Because just beginners play neg. double just up to 4 Heart and 4 NT as takeout?
Yes typical beginner thinking.
I know some partnerships who play neg. double up to 4 HEart. They can double for penalties. If you have this agreement, double is an alternative.
However with no agreement or the knowledge that X is take out or even optional, there is no LA!
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#9
Posted 2008-January-08, 16:42
- hrothgar
#11
Posted 2008-January-09, 11:44
Apollo81, on Jan 8 2008, 01:25 PM, said:
AKxx
Axxx
Axxx
x
1♦-(4♠)-p-(p)
??
What call would you make?
What are the logical alternatives, if any?
Pass, and take the plus. I play neg x's thru 3♠, as do a lot of folks. Here a double should be "cooperative," showing cards, not strictly penalty. That said, if we dbl, P is too likely to bid 5 ♣, so I don't really see an LA.
#12
Posted 2008-January-09, 12:12
#13
Posted 2008-January-09, 13:17
cherdano, on Jan 9 2008, 01:12 PM, said:
Director!

Help
