Posted 2008-January-01, 10:46
This would have been a greater story had North-South decided to use Smolenized Slam Tries by Opener.
North bids 5♥ only if he has what others would consider a 5♠ call. He bids 5♠ with holdings that others would consider a 5♥ call. This allows the partnership to have flexibility in the final contract, as to who declares, a critical tool when the person to Opener's right has announced incredible length in one or two suits and, accordingly, a high likelihood of a void on the side.
This enables South to go that extra mile and bid 7♥. If he gets a diamond lead, the show is over. A heart lead also makes it easy. South cashes two hearts to learn of the split, ending on dummy. He plays Q-J-x of spades, likely ending in hand. A diamond if ruffed and a spade ruffed. Now, the moment of truth. South needs all four clubs to make this. The only hope, then, is the stiff Queen to his right. So, club to King, dropping the Queen, pull the last trumps, ditching his remaining diamonds, and claim with clubs.
A club lead seems beneficial, but it leads to problems. Declarer again needs all four clubs. But, he can win whichever honor first that he needs to win. Let's keep options open and win the Ace in hand, noting the Queen drop.
Declarer now sees entry problems. So, he decides that he needs hearts to be 4-1, which seems likely anyway because of the club split. So, heart to King.
Declarer now plays the spades on dummy from the top, probably again ending up with small to the Ace as the third spade play. A diamond if ruffed, and then a spade is ruffed. But, that leaves Declarer trapped, unable to pull that last trump.
Now, obviously East's pass of 7♣X was bizarre. However, imagine an auction where North bids a Smolenized Slam Try of 5♠, South bids 6♣ as a grand try, West bids 7♣, passed by North to show the diamond void, and then passed by East (planning to pull 7♣X to 7♦), the pass being a lead-director, that would be brilliant.
So, I think East just used a great tool at the wrong time.
Or, East is just an idiot. You decide.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.