How do you start the bidding?
Tough Decision Good Preempt
#2
Posted 2007-December-16, 09:50
Preempts in a minor suit are often more effective than preempts in a major suit because the opponents have to choice between three common game contracts rather then just two. Reminding myself of this often helps keep me from getting too aggressive.
#3
Posted 2007-December-16, 09:53
- hrothgar
#5
Posted 2007-December-16, 10:33
With a p/o partner I would bid 3♣.
#6
Posted 2007-December-16, 10:38
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#8
Posted 2007-December-16, 11:52
#9
Posted 2007-December-16, 12:27
#10
Posted 2007-December-16, 13:32
George Carlin
#11
Posted 2007-December-16, 13:51
gwnn, on Dec 16 2007, 02:32 PM, said:
3 Clubs
#12
Posted 2007-December-16, 17:08
nick_s, on Dec 16 2007, 10:50 AM, said:
There are 25 major suit cards out...odds seem pretty darned likely to me that opps will choose a major if I give them the chance to do it so easily. And they have more chance to evaluate slam potential.
4♣ looks fine to me.
Aaron
#13
Posted 2007-December-16, 17:36
Your partner opens 4♣
What do you bid with:
#14
Posted 2007-December-16, 17:40
- hrothgar
#15
Posted 2007-December-16, 18:30
#16
Posted 2007-December-16, 18:54
#17
Posted 2007-December-16, 20:18
kfay, on Dec 16 2007, 06:36 PM, said:
Your partner opens 4♣
What do you bid with:
AJT_Kxx_KJTx_AKx
GOP's 4C preempt should show one of
8C221, 8C311, or 8C320
It's a safe assumption you have no ♣ losers and that GOP has hard values outside of ♣'s. Pard also rates to have 2-3 Cover cards and at least one stiff or void. Especially having preempted 4C at Unfavorable opposite an unpassed hand.
Now let's see how the hands could fit together:
AJT_Kxx_KJTx is essentially Cxx_Cxx_Cxxx in the other 3 suits where "C" denotes a Cover card and "x" is a likely loser.
Cxx_Cxx_Cxxx : (xx_xx_x, xx_x_xx, x_xx_xx, etc) => only 2 losers
IOW, if GOP has =nothing= outside ♣'s We rate to make 5C
...and pard rates highly to have 2 cover cards.
Bid 6C.
#18
Posted 2007-December-16, 20:51
#19
Posted 2007-December-16, 21:31
jdonn, on Dec 16 2007, 12:27 PM, said:
I couldn't say it any better. 3♣ doesn't do enough and 5♣ seems to risky at this vul. 4♣ is rather risky as well, but it is also my call.
#20
Posted 2007-December-17, 02:21
The vulnerability matters.
Red vs. Green, 4C should show a hand
which goes -2.
You have 3 sure tricks and 2 additional Kings,
i.e. slam will have chances, except you are
missing 2 Aces.
Bid 4NT, if partner shows zero Aces with 5C,
you pass, else you can bid 6C.
If your partner did open 5C at the given vulnerability
you have a clear raise to 6C, giving up on 7C.
With kind regards
Marlowe
PS: At any other vulnerability, I would just raise 4C
to 5C, and I may pass a 5C opener.
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)

Help
