Obviously bidding was correct at the table.
Something like: Pd passed with x,x, AKxxxx, xxxxx and we missed our 5 Diamond game?
But even knowing that the question here implies that bidding is correct, this is a "no look" pass.
Competing over a WkNT
#21
Posted 2007-December-17, 04:18
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#22
Posted 2007-December-17, 04:29
gwnn, on Dec 15 2007, 09:47 AM, said:
Bids over weak NT's should be CONSTRUCTIVE.... nothing constructive about our hand, unless we want to construct large negative integers and very low non-negative percentages.
A good case against constructivism. If you can prove the existence of negative numbers without actually constructing one, you're much safer
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#23
Posted 2007-December-17, 12:02
There's not much point to interfering. We are clearly not going to declare this hand.

Help
