BBO Discussion Forums: Seeing Red - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Seeing Red

#1 User is offline   kfay 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,208
  • Joined: 2007-July-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan
  • Interests:Science, Sports

Posted 2007-December-12, 01:00

I held this hand today and wasn't sure what to do:

Scoring: IMP

(1♠)-Dbl-(2♣)-?


Your call.
Kevin Fay
0

#2 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2007-December-12, 01:08

Pass is probably the book bid, but I'd probably bid 2♥ anyway at the table. Pd is strong balanced? We'll play a nice 4♥ contract. Pd isn't strong balanced? We have located a nice 9.5 card fit, and we can ruff spades in dummy and then we don't have all that many losers any more.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#3 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,383
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-December-12, 01:32

kfay, on Dec 12 2007, 02:00 AM, said:

I held this hand today and wasn't sure what to do:

Scoring: IMP

(1♠)-Dbl-(2♣)-?


Your call.

4H weakish

would cue and then 4H with more hcp/defense

In other words with more hcp and defense on any of these type of hands I cue first and rebid...I blast with weakish.

I do this whenever partner overcalls or opens the bidding and the opp are bidding also.
1) Blast=weakish
2) Cue and rebid with good hand.
0

#4 User is offline   CSGibson 

  • Tubthumper
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,835
  • Joined: 2007-July-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, OR, USA
  • Interests:Bridge, pool, financial crime. New experiences, new people.

Posted 2007-December-12, 01:32

I'm waffling between 3 and 4 hearts. I don't know which is correct, but with a likely 10 card heart fit, an ace opposite my partner's presumed shortness, the likelihood that partner's red suit values are well placed, and the chance to snag a vulerable game...Heck with it, I'm a 4 heart bidder.
Chris Gibson
0

#5 User is offline   CSGibson 

  • Tubthumper
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,835
  • Joined: 2007-July-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, OR, USA
  • Interests:Bridge, pool, financial crime. New experiences, new people.

Posted 2007-December-12, 01:35

gwnn, on Dec 11 2007, 11:08 PM, said:

Pass is probably the book bid

Partner knew you'd have to come in at the two level with a 3-4-3-3 0 count. You have shape and an ace. You owe partner at least a 2 heart bid no matter what books you are reading.
Chris Gibson
0

#6 User is offline   karlson 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 974
  • Joined: 2005-April-06

Posted 2007-December-12, 01:44

I can't imagine why pass is the book bid. 2h looks like an underbid if anything.

3h looks like a mild overbid though. Probably -2 if partner has his usual junk of xx KQxx Qxx KQxx. Hopefully if partner has x AKxx Axxx xxxx, he'll muster up a raise when the opponents compete to 2s or 3c.
0

#7 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,209
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-December-12, 03:19

3H, the alternative being 2H.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#8 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,209
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-December-12, 03:22

CSGibson, on Dec 12 2007, 02:32 AM, said:

I'm waffling between 3 and 4 hearts.  I don't know which is correct, but with a likely 10 card heart fit, an ace opposite my partner's presumed shortness, the likelihood that partner's red suit values are well placed, and the chance to snag a vulerable game...Heck with it, I'm a 4 heart bidder.

Hi,

I guess, it is more likely that partner sits on
a strong hand, than that he looks at 4 hearts.

And the 2C bid just makes this more likely,
since 2C is played as nonforcing by most, even
if you play that a change of suit after an overcall
is forcing.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#9 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,383
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-December-12, 03:40

geez i must admit i thought this was another 4h wtp...i guess not..2h???3h??? never crossed me brain. :)

I really thought 100% would bid 4h ..guess not.


2c is F1 is standard I was taught. I doubt p has to xx to force one round 100%.
0

#10 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,383
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-December-12, 03:56

[quote name='karlson' date='Dec 12 2007, 02:44 AM'] -2 if partner has his usual junk of xx KQxx Qxx KQxx.


Perhaps this is the current standard or never was but I thought this example is too weak to double one spade?
0

#11 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2007-December-12, 05:09

4♥. With a bit of luck, pard will be listening to the action and will able to tell this is shape-based, not strength based.
0

#12 User is offline   karlson 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 974
  • Joined: 2005-April-06

Posted 2007-December-12, 06:02

[quote name='mike777' date='Dec 12 2007, 01:56 AM'] [quote name='karlson' date='Dec 12 2007, 02:44 AM'] -2 if partner has his usual junk of xx KQxx Qxx KQxx.


Perhaps this is the current standard or never was but I thought this example is too weak to double one spade? [/quote]
Sure. I tried to give the worst hand possible, this is probably a submin for most people.
Besides, 4s looks pretty good with the opponents' cards on that example.

I have to admit I'm leaning more towards 3h.
0

#13 User is offline   SoTired 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,016
  • Joined: 2005-June-20
  • Location:Lovettsville, VA

Posted 2007-December-12, 06:35

This is a textbook 4H bid.

When advancing a takeout dbl, a simple free bid or a single jump show values. A double (or triple) jump is preemptive. Your hand is preemptive (only 4 HCP). With a 6-card suit, you likely have a 10-card heart fit, so preempt to 4H. You might make it.
It costs nothing to be nice -- my better half
0

#14 User is offline   goobers 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 372
  • Joined: 2006-December-04

Posted 2007-December-12, 09:49

I thought 3H would show a good hand assuming 2C is NF.

I would've bid 2H and taken the push to 3.
0

#15 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,401
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2007-December-12, 09:56

3 or 4, most likely 4.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#16 User is offline   kfay 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,208
  • Joined: 2007-July-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan
  • Interests:Science, Sports

Posted 2007-December-12, 09:59

I bid a confident 4♥. What is partner thinking when they hear that and are staring at this giant:



Kevin Fay
0

#17 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,401
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2007-December-12, 10:04

Oops I think I would bid 5♥ but there are several options.

Btw I think I would have overcalled 3♠ (maybe influenced by the developments, lol) with that hand, although dbl certainly isn't wrong.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#18 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,483
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2007-December-12, 10:05

kfay, on Dec 12 2007, 04:59 PM, said:

I bid a confident 4♥. What is partner thinking when they hear that and are staring at this giant:



Partner is think "I really wish I had overcalled in diamonds on the first round"
0

#19 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2007-December-12, 10:07

that hand is much too strong for 3♠ and just strong enough for X+diamonds.

now I can see only two alternatives: pass (pd didnt promise the world) and 5♦, and I love my diamonds so would bid 5♦

btw yea my first post didnt make sense, pass is nonsense. But 4♥ is a bit too extreme for me and I still think 2♥ is best.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#20 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2007-December-12, 10:15

SoTired, on Dec 12 2007, 07:35 AM, said:

This is a textbook 4H bid.

When advancing a takeout dbl, a simple free bid or a single jump show values. A double (or triple) jump is preemptive. Your hand is preemptive (only 4 HCP). With a 6-card suit, you likely have a 10-card heart fit, so preempt to 4H. You might make it.

Not any textbook that I have ever read. 4♥ is not preemptive.

I would bid 2♥. And if the opponents compete, I would bid 3♥. That is an accurate assessment of my hand.

If partner makes any move towards game, I would accept.
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users