Your call.
Seeing Red
#1
Posted 2007-December-12, 01:00
Your call.
#2
Posted 2007-December-12, 01:08
George Carlin
#3
Posted 2007-December-12, 01:32
kfay, on Dec 12 2007, 02:00 AM, said:
(1♠)-Dbl-(2♣)-?
Your call.
4H weakish
would cue and then 4H with more hcp/defense
In other words with more hcp and defense on any of these type of hands I cue first and rebid...I blast with weakish.
I do this whenever partner overcalls or opens the bidding and the opp are bidding also.
1) Blast=weakish
2) Cue and rebid with good hand.
#4
Posted 2007-December-12, 01:32
#5
Posted 2007-December-12, 01:35
gwnn, on Dec 11 2007, 11:08 PM, said:
Partner knew you'd have to come in at the two level with a 3-4-3-3 0 count. You have shape and an ace. You owe partner at least a 2 heart bid no matter what books you are reading.
#6
Posted 2007-December-12, 01:44
3h looks like a mild overbid though. Probably -2 if partner has his usual junk of xx KQxx Qxx KQxx. Hopefully if partner has x AKxx Axxx xxxx, he'll muster up a raise when the opponents compete to 2s or 3c.
#7
Posted 2007-December-12, 03:19
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#8
Posted 2007-December-12, 03:22
CSGibson, on Dec 12 2007, 02:32 AM, said:
Hi,
I guess, it is more likely that partner sits on
a strong hand, than that he looks at 4 hearts.
And the 2C bid just makes this more likely,
since 2C is played as nonforcing by most, even
if you play that a change of suit after an overcall
is forcing.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#9
Posted 2007-December-12, 03:40
I really thought 100% would bid 4h ..guess not.
2c is F1 is standard I was taught. I doubt p has to xx to force one round 100%.
#10
Posted 2007-December-12, 03:56
Perhaps this is the current standard or never was but I thought this example is too weak to double one spade?
#11
Posted 2007-December-12, 05:09
#12
Posted 2007-December-12, 06:02
Perhaps this is the current standard or never was but I thought this example is too weak to double one spade? [/quote]
Sure. I tried to give the worst hand possible, this is probably a submin for most people.
Besides, 4s looks pretty good with the opponents' cards on that example.
I have to admit I'm leaning more towards 3h.
#13
Posted 2007-December-12, 06:35
When advancing a takeout dbl, a simple free bid or a single jump show values. A double (or triple) jump is preemptive. Your hand is preemptive (only 4 HCP). With a 6-card suit, you likely have a 10-card heart fit, so preempt to 4H. You might make it.
#14
Posted 2007-December-12, 09:49
I would've bid 2H and taken the push to 3.
#15
Posted 2007-December-12, 09:56
#16
Posted 2007-December-12, 09:59
#17
Posted 2007-December-12, 10:04
Btw I think I would have overcalled 3♠ (maybe influenced by the developments, lol) with that hand, although dbl certainly isn't wrong.
#18
Posted 2007-December-12, 10:05
kfay, on Dec 12 2007, 04:59 PM, said:
Partner is think "I really wish I had overcalled in diamonds on the first round"
#19
Posted 2007-December-12, 10:07
now I can see only two alternatives: pass (pd didnt promise the world) and 5♦, and I love my diamonds so would bid 5♦
btw yea my first post didnt make sense, pass is nonsense. But 4♥ is a bit too extreme for me and I still think 2♥ is best.
George Carlin
#20
Posted 2007-December-12, 10:15
SoTired, on Dec 12 2007, 07:35 AM, said:
When advancing a takeout dbl, a simple free bid or a single jump show values. A double (or triple) jump is preemptive. Your hand is preemptive (only 4 HCP). With a 6-card suit, you likely have a 10-card heart fit, so preempt to 4H. You might make it.
Not any textbook that I have ever read. 4♥ is not preemptive.
I would bid 2♥. And if the opponents compete, I would bid 3♥. That is an accurate assessment of my hand.
If partner makes any move towards game, I would accept.

Help

(1♠)-Dbl-(2♣)-?