BBO Discussion Forums: Responding to a balancing double - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Responding to a balancing double

#1 User is offline   paulg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,280
  • Joined: 2003-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Edinburgh

Posted 2007-October-08, 07:04

Scoring: IMP

(1♦) Pass (Pass) Dbl
(Pass) ?

All players are Scottish experts (an oxymoron?). Anyhow it's your call?

Thanks,

Paul
The Beer Card

I don't work for BBO and any advice is based on my BBO experience over the decades
0

#2 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,402
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2007-October-08, 07:08

The principle of the defered king ..... I still have two aces, just enough for 2♠ I suppose.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#3 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2007-October-08, 08:53

whatever she says
0

#4 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,244
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-October-08, 09:03

Fluffy, on Oct 8 2007, 09:53 AM, said:

whatever she says

agree.
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#5 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2007-October-08, 09:36

I saw yesterday that Duboin-Bocchi play 1H shows spades. I don't know the rest of the structure but I'd like to use it here, just for fun. Otherwise I'd bid 2S.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#6 User is offline   paulg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,280
  • Joined: 2003-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Edinburgh

Posted 2007-October-08, 10:13

Hannie, on Oct 8 2007, 04:36 PM, said:

I saw yesterday that Duboin-Bocchi play 1H shows spades. I don't know the rest of the structure but I'd like to use it here, just for fun. Otherwise I'd bid 2S.

In their final set I noticed that Duboin-Bocchi played 1NT as showing clubs over (P)-P-(1♠)-Dbl-(P), which is an unusual treatment.
The Beer Card

I don't work for BBO and any advice is based on my BBO experience over the decades
0

#7 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2007-October-08, 10:52

Hannie, on Oct 8 2007, 07:36 AM, said:

I saw yesterday that Duboin-Bocchi play 1H shows spades. I don't know the rest of the structure but I'd like to use it here, just for fun. Otherwise I'd bid 2S.

I saw this too, and I think its very intriguing. I like the opening bidder on lead, but these transfers allow you to make a low level force which looks very flexible.

Does anyone know more about this structure? I would assume 2 level bids and higher would be 'blocking'?

Not playing anything like this, 2♠ looks accurate to me.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#8 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2007-October-08, 12:27

2S
0

#9 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2007-October-08, 13:47

Aye, just about par for 2♠.

Unless you rank aces as 5 points, that is.. lol.
0

#10 User is offline   paulg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,280
  • Joined: 2003-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Edinburgh

Posted 2007-October-08, 16:46

I, the doubler, held
♠ Qxx
♥ Qxxx
♦ Jx
♣ AKxx

2♠ is a tricky contract but you are likely to make it.

My esteemed CHO decided he didn't want to play in the wrong fit and cue bid 2♦. As you see, when you do not have a fit this approach is doomed to failure, the auction speeded ahead and I played the hand well to make eight tricks in hearts (down 2, don't ask!).

At the other table they responded a simple 1♠ and played there.

Paul
The Beer Card

I don't work for BBO and any advice is based on my BBO experience over the decades
0

#11 User is offline   dake50 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,211
  • Joined: 2006-April-22

Posted 2007-October-08, 21:13

Want to play Herbert to X so 1S isn't weak.
Or Xfer advances so I make a 2nd noise.
0

#12 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2007-October-09, 05:03

IN SEF this is easy:

2 ♦ shows BOTH majors 8-10 OR a strong hand.

CHOs hand did not qualify for one of these explanations.
So in SEF it is a very easy 2 Spade bid. And 2 Spade is surely as good to play as 2 Heart.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#13 User is offline   paulg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,280
  • Joined: 2003-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Edinburgh

Posted 2007-October-09, 05:30

Codo, on Oct 9 2007, 12:03 PM, said:

IN SEF this is easy:

2 ♦ shows BOTH majors 8-10 OR a strong hand.

CHOs hand did not qualify for one of these explanations.
So in SEF it is a very easy 2 Spade bid. And 2 Spade is surely as good to play as 2 Heart.

My view exactly.

Paul
The Beer Card

I don't work for BBO and any advice is based on my BBO experience over the decades
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users