Same old story
#1
Posted 2007-September-22, 18:35
- hrothgar
#2 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-September-22, 18:56
cherdano: 2H
mikeh: 1N
jdonn: whatever my pard likes
mike777: why did we open this hand? my openers are 13+
#3
Posted 2007-September-22, 18:59
#4
Posted 2007-September-22, 19:00
Jlall, on Sep 22 2007, 06:56 PM, said:
mike777 (aggressive day): if my partner expects me to open aggressively I bid 1S and will show extras by bidding 2H next
#5
Posted 2007-September-22, 19:01
#6
Posted 2007-September-22, 19:13
- hrothgar
#7 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-September-22, 19:15
Anyways I think a style where you bid 1S is best but that's obviously highly debatable and I could be wrong and it probably doesn't make much difference long term what you choose.
#8
Posted 2007-September-22, 19:17
..neilkaz..
#9
Posted 2007-September-22, 19:20
Jlall, on Sep 22 2007, 08:15 PM, said:
Um....thank you.
#10
Posted 2007-September-22, 19:22
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#12
Posted 2007-September-23, 01:18
My partner had this hand and bid 1S, so now I'll know what to do if I ever play with him again.
- hrothgar
#14
Posted 2007-September-23, 05:31
Anyway, why don't you just play T-Walsh, it solves a lot of problems.
#15
Posted 2007-September-23, 06:02
helene_t, on Sep 23 2007, 01:31 PM, said:
Anyway, why don't you just play T-Walsh, it solves a lot of problems.
Well...there's several variations of T-Walsh out there, solving different kinds of problems, some of them creating other problems of their own. In some 1♣-1♦-1♥ shows "any" 11-13/14 and 1NT (17)18-19, in other the 1♥ rebid show exactly 3c♥. In my version the 1♥ rebid shows ANY hand with 3, 13-14 with 4 and most 18-19 balanced with 4....
As to the problem, with my new regular partner (I've got two regulars now) with whom I play Walsh, not T-Walsh, I'd rebid 1NT, since 1♠ promises an unbalanced hand. With most non-regular partners in my area I'd rebid 1♠ either playing up-the-line bidding or Walsh.
Harald
#16
Posted 2007-September-23, 06:16
An old fashioned bid for an old
problem.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#17
Posted 2007-September-23, 07:01
I don't understand 1♠: when partner bids hearts we're much more likely to belong in hearts than in spades. Bidding 1♠ seems to bury the heart suit, for example if partner bids 2♣ now.
#18
Posted 2007-September-23, 07:33
P_Marlowe, on Sep 23 2007, 07:16 AM, said:
An old fashioned bid for an old
problem.
With kind regards
Marlowe
The problem can't be too old -- this hasn't been an opening bid for that long.
#20 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-September-23, 13:29
david_c, on Sep 23 2007, 08:01 AM, said:
I don't understand 1♠: when partner bids hearts we're much more likely to belong in hearts than in spades. Bidding 1♠ seems to bury the heart suit, for example if partner bids 2♣ now.
I know you know this but just to clarify for everyone, obviously hands where partner has a game going hand don't matter since we will find the right spot regardless of what we start with. So to discuss partscores:
1S keeps in play playing 1N, 2C, 2S, and 2H when partner has 6. The downside is that we miss 5-3 heart fits. My feeling is though the single most likely scenario is that we want to play 2H in a 5-3, the combined possibilities that we belong in spades, NT, or clubs is greater than the chance we belong in a 5-3 heart fit.
Obviously on this hand 1N is the most likely bid to get us to the wrong spot (as I'm sure even the rational 1N advocates will tell you), but it fits into a system where 1S shows an unbalanced hand and the gains on all other bids you make besides 1N are greater than in a system where you bid 1S or 2H on this hand.

Help

1C - 1H
??