2C overcall?
#1
Posted 2007-August-29, 18:35
RHO deals and opens 1S.
#3
Posted 2007-August-29, 19:54
-P.J. Painter.
#4
Posted 2007-August-29, 20:22
#5
Posted 2007-August-29, 20:48
#6
Posted 2007-August-29, 20:50
jdonn, on Aug 29 2007, 09:48 PM, said:
Wow.
-P.J. Painter.
#7
Posted 2007-August-29, 21:24
btw I do not think bidding 2c is bad, it is close.
This may force partner under the gun if it goes 1s=p=3s(weak)
#10
Posted 2007-August-29, 22:55
mike777, on Aug 29 2007, 10:36 PM, said:
3...A3....T532...KQJ763
Well yes.
- hrothgar
#11
Posted 2007-August-29, 23:03
Hannie, on Aug 29 2007, 11:55 PM, said:
mike777, on Aug 29 2007, 10:36 PM, said:
3...A3....T532...KQJ763
Well yes.
The point being that hand is better than the one in this thread. But then Justin and others seem to say this example is auto also so......
#12
Posted 2007-August-30, 00:07
mike777, on Aug 30 2007, 12:03 AM, said:
Hannie, on Aug 29 2007, 11:55 PM, said:
mike777, on Aug 29 2007, 10:36 PM, said:
3...A3....T532...KQJ763
Well yes.
The point being that hand is better than the one in this thread. But then Justin and others seem to say this example is auto also so......
The point being that the quality and length of the suit is far more important than the strength of the hand.
#13
Posted 2007-August-30, 05:25
mike777, on Aug 29 2007, 10:36 PM, said:
3...A3....T532...KQJ763
I would also overcall 2♣ with that hand.
-P.J. Painter.
#14
Posted 2007-August-30, 05:52
#15
Posted 2007-August-30, 06:12
As Sabine Auken has pointed out several times: a 2♣ overcall after 1♦ often makes it difficult for the opponents. As it is here, one major has been bid already, so the 2♣ overcall is unlikely to make it difficult for my LHO.
Roland
#16
Posted 2007-August-30, 06:15
Walddk, on Aug 30 2007, 07:12 AM, said:
As Sabine Auken has pointed out several times: a 2♣ overcall after 1♦ often makes it difficult for the opponents. As it is here, one major has been bid already, so the 2♣ overcall is unlikely to make it difficult for my LHO.
Roland
That's one of the difference for me. Had the opening been 1♦, 2♣ looks beter, both for preemptive effect and because I now have notrump viability.
-P.J. Painter.
#17
Posted 2007-August-30, 12:34
Walddk, on Aug 30 2007, 07:12 AM, said:
I'm with Roland.
- hrothgar
#18
Posted 2007-August-30, 12:38
#19
Posted 2007-August-30, 13:15
Harald
#20
Posted 2007-August-31, 00:19

Help
