BBO Discussion Forums: Your discard - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Your discard

#1 User is offline   ralph23 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 701
  • Joined: 2007-July-11

Posted 2007-July-23, 13:12

Scoring: IMP


South opens 1NT and North raises to 3NT. You are told that 1NT opening shows 15-17 HCP.

Your lead method is 4th best from long suit.

Partner leads the 6 of ♦, dummy plays low and you play the Jack. Declarer takes the King.

He then leads a low ♣ from his hand and partner plays the Jack. Declarer takes dummy's King and returns the 7 of ♣, and it's your play.

What do you discard, and more importantly, why ?

{NB - Sorry Harald, got a phone call in the middle and had to quit for a minute! I think it's complete now . :lol: )
♣♦♥♠ Philosophy consists very largely of one philosopher arguing that other philosophers are all jackasses. He usually proves it, and I should add that he also usually proves that he is one himself. H.L. Mencken. ♣♦♥♠
0

#2 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2007-July-23, 14:03

I refuse to make a discard without knowing the bidding and play! :lol:
I can only guess that someone played a couple of rounds of ♣'s....
Kind regards,
Harald
0

#3 User is offline   goobers 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 372
  • Joined: 2006-December-04

Posted 2007-July-23, 14:19

This seems fairly obvious, declarer has no more diamond stops (you know by rule of 11), so pitch the DQ and let partner run his suit.
0

#4 User is offline   jtfanclub 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,937
  • Joined: 2004-June-05

Posted 2007-July-23, 14:26

Spoiler

0

#5 User is offline   ralph23 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 701
  • Joined: 2007-July-11

Posted 2007-July-23, 14:29

Excellent goobers. Now part deux: Suppose East instead discards a small (discouraging) ♠.

West will win his Queen of ♣ either on this trick or the next, depending on whether declarer takes his Ace this time (at trick 2) or ducks trick 2 to your partner. {NB -- You must assume your partner voluntarily split his ♣ honors. Which is more likely than his having been dealt QJ tight, and besides, if he was dealt only 2 clubs, it doesn't look very good for the good guys.... }

What do you think West should lead in this case ? And why ?
♣♦♥♠ Philosophy consists very largely of one philosopher arguing that other philosophers are all jackasses. He usually proves it, and I should add that he also usually proves that he is one himself. H.L. Mencken. ♣♦♥♠
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users