I don't agree, partner's shape with 3 spades has to be 3244, and if it is possible, I bet it is not a shape to play for.
Also I even disagree with opening 1♥ with 5♠, I understand (don't agree with them but I think they have a good point) the possible benefits of opening 1m with minor + major, but when you have both majors you will hate to bid spades at next round, no matter the level.
Do you have an agreement?
#22
Posted 2007-June-19, 15:19
Fluffy, on Jun 19 2007, 09:24 PM, said:
I don't agree, partner's shape with 3 spades has to be 3244, and if it is possible, I bet it is not a shape to play for.
Also I even disagree with opening 1♥ with 5♠, I understand (don't agree with them but I think they have a good point) the possible benefits of opening 1m with minor + major, but when you have both majors you will hate to bid spades at next round, no matter the level.
Also I even disagree with opening 1♥ with 5♠, I understand (don't agree with them but I think they have a good point) the possible benefits of opening 1m with minor + major, but when you have both majors you will hate to bid spades at next round, no matter the level.
1H (4C) ?
KQx
Qx
AQJxx
xxx
What do you do if you don't double?
If you systemically open 1S with 5-6 or 5-7 in the majors then all subsequent inferences are different, certainly, but that isn't the normal approach, particularly with a strong major 2-suiter.

Help
