Quote
Yes, Winston, I saw also that we will have some problems after 2♠ where the strong hand is still undescribed according to distribution. But it seems that I am very lonely with my pessimistic view... And as the cards lie, the optimists are right
This sequence comes up now and again so it is wise to have some type agreement in place - my personal thinking is that this double-then-cue should be considered a "request for further clarification". How to continue from there is up for grabs.
2NT could be used to deny much shape or interest, but loses a natural encouraging meaning, although I think this loss not overly substantial and it leaves a rebid to show length and weakness. (2N would be a handy 'bad hand/bad shape' bid if you were forced to bid a 3-card minor.)

Help
