BBO Discussion Forums: Gloating at Result - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Gloating at Result Blacklistable Behavior?

#1 User is offline   AAr 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 117
  • Joined: 2004-September-28

Posted 2006-December-03, 03:17

I remember a couple of years ago, I played in a tourney where many were TDs. I scored +1100 and said "I love it when I score 1100s". The opponents, which were TDs, were offended said that this is impolite behavior. I know that rude behavior is against BBO rules, so I'll ask these questions:

1. Is the behavior I described acceptable or really impolite?
2. Can I be blacklisted by a TD for the above behavior?
3. Would you, as TD, blacklist a player for such behavior?
4. Can I be reported to Abuse for this behavior?

Just wondering if what I did that day was acceptable, or did I do something that a TD has a right to blacklist me for. Is it really rude manners? I was taught manners and always try to be polite and curtious as I was taught growing up (And, prefer playing with polite playersr over impolite playes. And, I don't want any TD blacklisting me. And, I do want to abide by BBO rules, as it is a great bridge site.

Thanks!
0

#2 User is offline   sceptic 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,343
  • Joined: 2004-January-03

Posted 2006-December-03, 05:26

I think if you are with friends this may be accepatable behaviour, against people that don't know you and they don't know what kind of person you are, it could be seen as rude, they can report you and if you are seen to be rude I think someone would point this out to you first and give you a chance to change your behaviour, rather than ban you, abuse@bridgebase is managed by some one of exceptionally fair judgement

personally I think a lot of people are oversensitive and should really try and relax, I dislike some of the riules about what is proper behaviour in brigde, but then I feel I an in a minority here,

I am sure that if you never meant any offence, then that is ok, some people are just as I said before over sensitive, enjoy bridge base it is a great place with some great people in it

you do not seem like a rude person to me

by the way and TD can blacklist you for what he likes, as can any person on BBO, it is a function available to all of us
0

#3 User is offline   pbleighton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,153
  • Joined: 2003-February-28

Posted 2006-December-03, 06:05

"personally I think a lot of people are oversensitive and should really try and relax, I dislike some of the riules about what is proper behaviour in brigde, but then I feel I an in a minority here"

I agree, but "gloating" IS a violation of bridge etiquette, and some people are very sensitive. In my early bridge days, I was reprimanded several times (once quite rudely) bit off by some of those "oversensitive" people. These people all had unpleasant but "within the lines" behavior of their own....

So it's better to be careful.

Peter
0

#4 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,401
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2006-December-03, 06:06

My immediate thoughts are that It's not excatly polite but opps should just pretend to be grown-ups and don't make a big deal about it. If one of them happens to be your bridge teacher (or one of your parents in case you're <16) it's ok to make a remark. Otherwise just ignore it.

That being said, it depends on a lot of things. Your relationship with the opps (any tensions between you from the previous boards?) and the way you articulated your "gloating".

And the circumstances. If they sacrificed against a cold but non-vulnerable slam it's no big deal. If they had a pathetic bidding misunderstanding induced by your diabolic three-way preempt against which they had no defense, being a pick-up partnership, it's a lot worse.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#5 User is offline   Walddk 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,190
  • Joined: 2003-September-30
  • Location:London, England
  • Interests:Cricket

Posted 2006-December-03, 08:43

According to the Rules of this Site your offence is not among the serious ones, only among "bad manners". Quote:

"The following are examples of bad manners. You will have trouble making friends if you:

<snip>

Gloat when you get a good result and complain when you get a bad result."

As I read it, abuse will not get involved if you are reported.

Roland
It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice
0

#6 User is online   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,907
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2006-December-03, 09:03

1. impolite
2. yes - free td's can restrict entry to their tournaments for any reason
3. That would depend how Im feeling at the time :lol: Seriously, I wouldnt ban someone for that behavior but I would try to avoid playing with or against someone who behaved like that at the table. Thats what private chat to your partner is for.
4. Yes but I'd say abuse would not get invloved.
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Bridge should be fun!
0

#7 User is offline   glen 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,637
  • Joined: 2003-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ottawa, Canada
  • Interests:Military history, WW II wargames

Posted 2006-December-03, 09:11

In ACBL Zero Tolerance gloating would likely be considered "embarrassing remarks" that would "interfere with the enjoyment of the game".

See: ACBL Zero Tolerance

Of interest is that this policy states that "Greeting others in a friendly manner" is a "commendable behavior", but "not required".

However in: Fall 2006 NABC Second Sunday Bulletin - see page 2 top right

the ZT Update column by Paul Cronin says:

Quote

When you sit down at a table and say “hello,” make sure your opponents say “hello” to you. If they ignore you and continue to discuss a previous
hand, interject politely that you would appreciate being recognized.

And then right back to this thread topic the article continues:

Quote

Don’t tolerate criticism or gloating of any kind at the table.
So given this clear statement, gloating of any kind in ACBL BBO tourneys might get the TDs on your case if they were following ZT as described in the quoted article.
'I hit my peak at seven' Taylor Swift
0

#8 User is offline   uday 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,808
  • Joined: 2003-January-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:USA

Posted 2006-December-03, 09:58

Quote

1. Is the behavior I described acceptable or really impolite?

I find it unacceptably rude. Your own mileage may vary


Quote

2. Can I be blacklisted by a TD for the above behavior?


The TD can blacklist you for any reason whatsoever. He may not blacklist you for being green-skinned, living in Antarctica, etc.

Quote

3. Would you, as TD, blacklist a player for such behavior?

Y


Quote

4. Can I be reported to Abuse for this behavior?

Yes, tho it would likely take more than a single such report before we acted.
0

#9 User is offline   DJNeill 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 455
  • Joined: 2003-September-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hillsboro, OR USA
  • Interests:current events, long-distance cycling

Posted 2006-December-03, 10:29

Yet another reason one would want to see the friend/enemy status of a director on the tourney description. What if a director was too fascist or lassez-faire with the banning for your tastes? Hard to know that if the director is not logged in.

Dan
0

#10 User is offline   csdenmark 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,422
  • Joined: 2003-February-13

Posted 2006-December-03, 11:26

AAr, on Dec 3 2006, 11:17 AM, said:

I remember a couple of years ago, I played in a tourney where many were TDs. I scored +1100 and said "I love it when I score 1100s". The opponents, which were TDs, were offended said that this is impolite behavior. I know that rude behavior is against BBO rules, so I'll ask these questions:

1. Is the behavior I described acceptable or really impolite?

I also enjoy such a score. 1100 is based on mistakes in interfering handles and those who have too little distance to what they are dealing with ought to stay away from dealing with others.

No matter if this was hitting opps. or myself - I normally make a comment on such. Thats normally paving the way for a lively table with good social comfort.

On a bad day I think I would tend to make a reprimande to your opps. for making trouble out of nothing.
0

#11 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2006-December-03, 12:39

There's really not a reason to say anything after a +1100. Not even a "good double pard" or "nice defense".

I hate to say it, but you shouldn't even do it with friends. If the declarer said a wise crack, you can join in, but chances are they are pretty ticked off. Any additional comment usually results in making the situation worse.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#12 User is offline   matmat 

  • ded
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,459
  • Joined: 2005-August-11
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2006-December-03, 13:07

pclayton, on Dec 3 2006, 01:39 PM, said:

There's really not a reason to say anything after a +1100. Not even a "good double pard" or "nice defense".

I hate to say it, but you shouldn't even do it with friends. If the declarer said a wise crack, you can join in, but chances are they are pretty ticked off. Any additional comment usually results in making the situation worse them.

I agree. though I find that sometimes it's worth it to say something like that if the opps themselves have been unnecesserily curt or rude.
0

#13 User is offline   sceptic 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,343
  • Joined: 2004-January-03

Posted 2006-December-03, 13:11

if opps are rude I can think of better ways to lower myself to their level than wow 1100 hahaha
0

#14 User is online   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,907
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2006-December-03, 14:08

uday, on Dec 3 2006, 08:58 AM, said:

Quote

3. Would you, as TD, blacklist a player for such behavior?

Y


Idealy I would ban these people too but I've found the limited number of entries on a blacklist are best reserved for those players who tell their partners to &*(&*(&(* &()()))&^ and the 7ntxx bidders. :P
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Bridge should be fun!
0

#15 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,051
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2006-December-03, 16:59

I''ve never really understood why people felt the need for a Zero Tolerance policy. We have a law (74A) which makes rudeness at the bridge table illegal. Why not just enforce the law?

And yes, gloating over your score would be a violation of Law.
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
Our ultimate goal on defense is to know by trick two or three everyone's hand at the table. -- Mike777
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
0

#16 User is offline   csdenmark 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,422
  • Joined: 2003-February-13

Posted 2006-December-03, 17:28

If you are not allowed to be happy for a gift I understand nothing. Even happy expressions seems to have escalated much in sport during last 20 years and I think they still represent honest satisfaction for a positive score.

You are encouraged to congratulate your opps. for doing well but you are not allowed to express anything if they are doing mistakes. Very interesting.

I think we are human beings - and I will not accept only to be a puppet.

My question will now be - how about mourning for losing -1100?
0

#17 User is offline   pigpenz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,554
  • Joined: 2005-April-25

Posted 2006-December-03, 19:16

officeglen, on Dec 3 2006, 10:11 AM, said:

In ACBL Zero Tolerance gloating would likely be considered "embarrassing remarks" that would "interfere with the enjoyment of the game".

See: ACBL Zero Tolerance

Of interest is that this policy states that "Greeting others in a friendly manner" is a "commendable behavior", but "not required".

However in: Fall 2006 NABC Second Sunday Bulletin - see page 2 top right

the ZT Update column by Paul Cronin says:

Quote

When you sit down at a table and say “hello,” make sure your opponents say “hello” to you. If they ignore you and continue to discuss a previous
hand, interject politely that you would appreciate being recognized.

And then right back to this thread topic the article continues:

Quote

Don’t tolerate criticism or gloating of any kind at the table.
So given this clear statement, gloating of any kind in ACBL BBO tourneys might get the TDs on your case if they were following ZT as described in the quoted article.

Glen:
Good luck :P
In a recent ACBL game here partner opened 2 in third seat my right hand opp doubled and i bid 2 after which partner bid 3 the doubler bid 4.

I started A and a club hoping for shortness in partners hand at which the doubler/4 bidder remarked:

"you may know how to psyche but your defense isnt worth *****"

TD was called and was too busy to go over anything :(

Now is this ZERO Tolerance infraction?

I guess comments are best left to yourself :)
0

#18 User is offline   glen 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,637
  • Joined: 2003-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ottawa, Canada
  • Interests:Military history, WW II wargames

Posted 2006-December-03, 21:04

My wife and I continue to get unsolicited feedback on ACBL BBO games. Today was typical - we were out playing f2f and the table conversation goes:

Player: Haven't see you out much here, where are you playing?
Us: Mostly online.
Player: Which site?
Us: Bridge Base Online.
Player: You should have seen the other day in a ACBL tourney. I and another player are playing against two really good opponents, and my partner goes down in a cold contract, and then questions the signalling methods of the opponents. One opponents says "it doesn't matter, the contract was cold idiot". My partner then fires right back with a nasty comment. The TD is called and kicks out both my partner and the opponent, and then assigns -4 IMPs to me, so +4 IMPs to their side. Unbelievable!
Me: Actually both sides likely got -4 IMPs, just because your side got -4 for your partner's bad conduct does not mean they got +4. *

* at least I hope not!

The good news here is that ZT was employed, which it is not always. The bad news is:
a ) TD actions are not always being communicated properly, resulting sometimes in bad feelings;
b ) There seems to be some common frustration freely expressed by participants.

Perhaps this is just due to the quality of our f2f club TDs around here, so that is what the TDs online get measured by. However the only way to get a measure of the degree of problem of a and b above would be to note in each tourney where complaints should be directed. This would avoid the 3-5% of the same people reporting the same problems which really doesn't get us much anywhere.
'I hit my peak at seven' Taylor Swift
0

#19 User is offline   Al_U_Card 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,080
  • Joined: 2005-May-16
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2006-December-04, 08:38

Do unto others.......and accept the consequences, whatever they may be but don't be surprised if those results displease you and then just learn from your mistake. ;-)
The Grand Design, reflected in the face of Chaos...it's a fluke!
0

#20 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,483
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2006-December-04, 10:09

AAr, on Dec 3 2006, 10:17 AM, said:

1. Is the behavior I described acceptable or really impolite?
2. Can I be blacklisted by a TD for the above behavior?
3. Would you, as TD, blacklist a player for such behavior?
4. Can I be reported to Abuse for this behavior?

1. To me, it's really impolite (unless against very good friends)
2/3. Blacklisting seems extreme. As a f2f TD I would suggest you apologise to your opponents and leave it at that.
4. You can be reported to abuse for anything.

If you were consistently unpleasant whenever you got a good result, or suggest opponents are just stupid and lucky when they get a good result, you can expect sanctions. If you are occasionally rude to people all you should expect is that some people may not want to play with you.
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users