The first question to ask is if my hand should force to game opposite pard's competitive 1NT response. Whaddayah think?
First things first xx K9xxxx AKJ AQ
#1
Posted 2006-May-12, 00:02
The first question to ask is if my hand should force to game opposite pard's competitive 1NT response. Whaddayah think?
#2
Posted 2006-May-12, 00:34
jdeegan, on May 12 2006, 01:02 AM, said:
P-1♥-1♠-1NT
P- ???
The first question to ask is if my hand should force to game opposite pard's competitive 1N response. Whaddayah think?
17 HCP + 2 length points = 19 playing points.
This a GF hand opposite =any= Response.
Pard's 1N bid in competition shows ~ the top half of your minimum responding range.
Say ~8-10 instead of ~6-10.
Not only should you GF, but you rate to take 11 tricks most of the time.
#3
Posted 2006-May-12, 00:44
The hand is only worth an inv., at least for me,
1NT could still be 6-10, it simply shows a spade
stopper.
The hand is nice, if you had an 9 card heart fit,
but partner already denied primary heart fit.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#4
Posted 2006-May-12, 02:25
#5
Posted 2006-May-12, 02:50
#6
Posted 2006-May-12, 02:52
and how right you are, lho holds xx, AQ, Qxx, KJT9xxx
and tried a semipsyche.... His pd lead a creative Club against 3 NT doubled and you are at least 4 down.
So, I won´t try to mastermind and force to game with 17+ ~9 HCPS.
Yes I would prefer a better suit and/or better spade spots. But Then I would look for slam, not game.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#7
Posted 2006-May-12, 03:02
KQx x Jxxxx xxxx
so I just invite.
#8
Posted 2006-May-12, 11:21
Pard made a freebid with 7hcp they pass.
#9
Posted 2006-May-12, 11:25
Luis
#10
Posted 2006-May-12, 11:47
I opted for 2N on the other thread, since I don't think the heart spot is especially material.
#11
Posted 2006-May-12, 11:49
Thus, when I make my 2N bid over partner's 1N, I come close to describing this hand: with a poor 14 or less, I would pass 1N (or bid 2 of a suit), and with 18 or more I would not let him out short of game. So I strongly suggest this type of hand. While the 6th ♥ is implied (and not strongly), rather than assured, it will come as no surprise to him that I have an extra card in a weak suit.
This hand should be downgraded because of the weak suit and the bulky minors: you rate to have real communication problems on this hand.
Now, give me the same shape with, say, xx AKxxxx KJx AQ and it is an entirely different hand even tho we have the same number of Aces, Kings, Queens and Jacks and precisely the same shape. With this hand, I would not let him out short of game: now I would try 2♠ to get some kind of descriptive call: 2N would promise good ♠, allowing 3N by me, while I would bid 3♥ (forcing) over 3 minor and 4♥ over 3♥.
BTW, this approach is also based on my preference for heavy invites and aggressive acceptances: thus my 2N will get us to game unless partner has a minimum. If 2N would be treated as asking for a maximum, I would rather force to game than invite. I view this posted hand as a heavy invite.
#12
Posted 2006-May-12, 12:01
If I thought this was worth a game force I would bid 2♠ followed by 4♥ over 3♥, or 3NT over anything else.
#13
Posted 2006-May-13, 02:27
luis, on May 12 2006, 06:25 PM, said:
Luis
LOL, in the other thread (same hand, same bidding, same everything), you bid 3♠...
#14
Posted 2006-May-13, 21:47
i feel like my thread's been kidnapped...
where did this hand come up?
#16
Posted 2006-May-16, 23:46
matmat, on May 13 2006, 10:47 PM, said:
i feel like my thread's been kidnapped...
where did this hand come up?

Help

P-1♥-1♠-1NT
P- ???