Help
Playing with a partner you play with seldom, you are playing pretty much basic Acol.
1) Do you play 3♣ here as GF by partner?
2) Do you agree with the 3♦ bid?
3) What now?
Page 1 of 1
Forcing to game?
#1
- Deipnosophist
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 4,386
- Joined: 2005-March-22
Posted 2005-September-11, 20:13
Playing with a partner you play with seldom, you are playing pretty much basic Acol.
1) Do you play 3♣ here as GF by partner?
2) Do you agree with the 3♦ bid?
3) What now?
"Half the people you know are below average." - Steven Wright
#2
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 313
- Joined: 2005-April-03
Posted 2005-September-11, 20:18
1) Yes
2) Yes
3) 4♠
2) Yes
3) 4♠
#3
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 14,900
- Joined: 2004-May-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:Portugal
- Interests:Everything!
Posted 2005-September-12, 02:50
1. Yes, but this is the sort of thing one should discuss with pard before a match 
2. Seems fine to me.
3. In a casual partnership, 4♠. With pet pard, 3NT expressing doubt.
2. Seems fine to me.
3. In a casual partnership, 4♠. With pet pard, 3NT expressing doubt.
#4
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 11,199
- Joined: 2005-March-18
- Gender:Male
Posted 2005-September-12, 08:32
1) it is playing basic Acol, with a weaker hand
he should make a neg. X, personnaly I dont
2) Yes, your most likely game is 3NT, you need
a stopper
3) 4S, what else? You hold a minimum opener
with few controlls.
With kind regards
Marlowe
he should make a neg. X, personnaly I dont
2) Yes, your most likely game is 3NT, you need
a stopper
3) 4S, what else? You hold a minimum opener
with few controlls.
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#5
- World International Master without a clue
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 17,404
- Joined: 2003-November-13
- Gender:Male
- Location:madrid
Posted 2005-September-12, 09:56
1) yes
2) No, would bid 3♥, 3♦ should show beter clubs or stronger.
3) 4♠, 3NT will suggest strrong balanced now.
2) No, would bid 3♥, 3♦ should show beter clubs or stronger.
3) 4♠, 3NT will suggest strrong balanced now.
#6
- Deipnosophist
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 4,386
- Joined: 2005-March-22
Posted 2005-September-12, 10:36
Scoring: IMP
1♠ - (2♦) - 3♣ - (P)
3♦ - (P) - 3♠ - All Pass
1♠ - (2♦) - 3♣ - (P)
3♦ - (P) - 3♠ - All Pass
I admit that this one I butchered completely. Saw my partner make a few aggressive bids earlier and wasn't feeling confident he meant his 3♣ as a game force. (He later said he thought my 3♦ was game forcing.) Obviously we needed to agree it. I think that playing a new suit at the 3 level as game forcing makes a lot of sense though, so take full responsibility. Live and learn.
"Half the people you know are below average." - Steven Wright
#7
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 9,151
- Joined: 2003-June-11
- Location:Southern California
Posted 2005-September-12, 12:03
Echognome, on Sep 12 2005, 08:36 AM, said:
Scoring: IMP
1♠ - (2♦) - 3♣ - (P)
3♦ - (P) - 3♠ - All Pass
1♠ - (2♦) - 3♣ - (P)
3♦ - (P) - 3♠ - All Pass
I admit that this one I butchered completely. Saw my partner make a few aggressive bids earlier and wasn't feeling confident he meant his 3♣ as a game force. (He later said he thought my 3♦ was game forcing.) Obviously we needed to agree it. I think that playing a new suit at the 3 level as game forcing makes a lot of sense though, so take full responsibility. Live and learn.
Matt, what may have happened is you felt ashamed of your cue bid and passed a forcing bid. Playing sayc, 2/1, or ACOL ( I guess), 3♣ should be a game force.
I wouldn't cue with this, since I don't use cue bids to 'punt'. I would just rebid my nice 5 card suit.
"Phil" on BBO
Page 1 of 1
1♠ - (2♦) - 3♣ - (P)
3♦ - (P) - 3♠ - (P)
?