Page 1 of 1
Is it possible in this hand to go in a club contract?
#4
Posted Yesterday, 13:42
#6
Posted Yesterday, 15:22
cencio, on 2026-August-18, 13:16, said:
North bid first 1 club
So it depends upon your agreements and style whether South uncontested would bid 1♦ or 1♥ and then how North rebids and how you handle XYN...
Was North dealer (put it in the diagram, please) or did South and/or West pass first?
Did East bid his hearts?
With decent agreements you should not miss at least game in clubs or 5♠X.
If North is dealer and East is unusually aggressive then with Italian control-bidding it might go:
1♣ (1♥) - 3NT
4♣ - 4♦
4♥ - 4♠
and then whatever your agreements you reach 6♣, for better or worse.
#7
Posted Yesterday, 18:04
mike777, on 2026-August-18, 14:58, said:
Sure it is possible, why not?
Possible but not likely.
North opens 1♣
Many E/W's will pass with those hands.
South bids 1 RED suit
North bid 1nt
South bids 2 or 3nt
It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.
"You need to play a lot of stuff these days just to deal with the stuff your opponents are playing" DBurn
"You need to play a lot of stuff these days just to deal with the stuff your opponents are playing" DBurn
#9
Posted Today, 00:04
Uncontested my Transfer Walsh approach will find the 9-card club fit, but I'd struggle to get to 5♣ let alone the 6♣ available and may end up stopping in 3N
As East I have 2-suited overcalls available so with East's hand I would intervene at this vulnerability with 2♥ as 45xx.
South then bids 2♠ (minor suit takeout), West competes to 3♠. North now has the choice of 3N/x♣.
If competition continues to 4♠ then I'd perhaps expect a doubled contract rather than 5/6♣.
Overall I'd expect a spread of outcomes in play.
As East I have 2-suited overcalls available so with East's hand I would intervene at this vulnerability with 2♥ as 45xx.
South then bids 2♠ (minor suit takeout), West competes to 3♠. North now has the choice of 3N/x♣.
If competition continues to 4♠ then I'd perhaps expect a doubled contract rather than 5/6♣.
Overall I'd expect a spread of outcomes in play.
#10
Posted Today, 04:17
mw64ahw, on 2026-August-19, 00:04, said:
Uncontested my Transfer Walsh approach will find the 9-card club fit, but I'd struggle to get to 5♣ let alone the 6♣ available and may end up stopping in 3N
As East I have 2-suited overcalls available so with East's hand I would intervene at this vulnerability with 2♥ as 45xx.
South then bids 2♠ (minor suit takeout), West competes to 3♠. North now has the choice of 3N/x♣.
If competition continues to 4♠ then I'd perhaps expect a doubled contract rather than 5/6♣.
Overall I'd expect a spread of outcomes in play.
As East I have 2-suited overcalls available so with East's hand I would intervene at this vulnerability with 2♥ as 45xx.
South then bids 2♠ (minor suit takeout), West competes to 3♠. North now has the choice of 3N/x♣.
If competition continues to 4♠ then I'd perhaps expect a doubled contract rather than 5/6♣.
Overall I'd expect a spread of outcomes in play.
6♣ is a desperately poor contract, you need very specific heart layouts for it to have much play.
Where we would end up would depend if E intervened over our weak NT, but unopposed the bad news is we'd be in 3N, the good news is that it would likely be on a heart lead.
If we were EW, if N opened 1♣ we would overcall 2♥. If it was 3+ cards, this would be natural and weak, if it was 2+ would be 44/45/54 majors.
Page 1 of 1

Help
Add Reply
MultiQuote