5-level decision
#1
Posted 2005-July-22, 04:28
♠ K9x
♥ ATx
♦ KQ
♣ 9xxxx
Pard RHO you LHO
1♠....pass..4♣...dbl
4♦.....4♥...pass.pass
dbl...pass.pass.5♣
dbl....5♦....??
4♣ = swiss raise. Balanced support, 12+ hcp, no club wastage
dbl of 4♣ = penalty, but from doubler's pard face, you realize he took it as take-out
4♦ = range inquiry
pass to 4♥ = bad 12-13 hcp
dbl of 4♥ and 5♣ for penalties
Your options are:
1. Pass (forcing), encourages pard to bid 5♠
2. Double, penalties
3. 5♠, good playing strenght, usually a 4th trump
Your bid?
#2
Posted 2005-July-22, 04:38
#3
Posted 2005-July-22, 04:58
Especially when you "see" that the opps have had a misunderstanding, they will be playing 5♦ with a likely 7-9card fit in diamonds
#5
Posted 2005-July-22, 06:08
Partner may still bid on, in which case he would
show slam interest, altough i doubt it, that he will.
because of his previous double.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#6
Posted 2005-July-22, 06:48
whereagles, on Jul 22 2005, 11:28 PM, said:
♠ K9x
♥ ATx
♦ KQ
♣ 9xxxx
Pard RHO you LHO
1♠....pass..4♣...dbl
4♦.....4♥...pass.pass
dbl...pass.pass.5♣
dbl....5♦....??
4♣ = swiss raise. Balanced support, 12+ hcp, no club wastage
dbl of 4♣ = penalty, but from doubler's pard face, you realize he took it as take-out
4♦ = range inquiry
pass to 4♥ = bad 12-13 hcp
dbl of 4♥ and 5♣ for penalties
Your options are:
1. Pass (forcing), encourages pard to bid 5♠
2. Double, penalties
3. 5♠, good playing strenght, usually a 4th trump
Your bid?
WOW why in the WORLD did I bid 4♣ originally is really MINIMUM for the bid (as I understand it
NOW IMHO the less objectionable of the alternatives is X
#7
Posted 2005-July-22, 10:31
whereagles, on Jul 22 2005, 05:28 AM, said:
♠ K9x
♥ ATx
♦ KQ
♣ 9xxxx
Pard RHO you LHO
1♠....pass..4♣...dbl
4♦.....4♥...pass.pass
dbl...pass.pass.5♣
dbl....5♦....??
4♣ = swiss raise. Balanced support, 12+ hcp, no club wastage
dbl of 4♣ = penalty, but from doubler's pard face, you realize he took it as take-out
4♦ = range inquiry
pass to 4♥ = bad 12-13 hcp
dbl of 4♥ and 5♣ for penalties
Your options are:
1. Pass (forcing), encourages pard to bid 5♠
2. Double, penalties
3. 5♠, good playing strenght, usually a 4th trump
Your bid?
Must admit this is a 1nt (semi-force) followed by 3s limit raise with 3 card support for me. In fact I could see partner passing 1nt or us going down in 3s.
I am unclear what 4Clubs means. 12-30 hcp and 3+spades and lousy clubs with a semi or balanced hand?
In your style why not double 4h? I guess you need to pass to show your hcp range?
In any event I hope I am allowed to X now?
btw my basic understanding of swiss is that is shows 13-15 hcp, balanced hand with 4 card support.
AQXX=KJXX=AXX=XX
4C promises at least 2 of top 3 honors in trump quality or shows 3 aces or 2 aces and the K of trumps.
4D denies.
Perhaps yours is a more enlightened version.
#8
Posted 2005-July-22, 15:08
- hrothgar
#9
Posted 2005-July-22, 23:18
By the way, what is RHO up to??? The way I read your posting, LHO made a lead directing double of 4♣, then RHO, after passing over one ♠, started bidding like a sandbagger with 11 or 12 red cards.
#10
Posted 2005-July-23, 00:00
with this as my reasoning, i put a red card onthe table.
#11
Posted 2005-July-23, 00:19
#12
Posted 2005-July-23, 02:26
#13
Posted 2005-July-23, 04:30
#14
Posted 2005-July-23, 06:05
I cooked it up myself, so you can call it the where-raise if you prefer
#15
Posted 2005-July-23, 09:21
whereagles, on Jul 23 2005, 07:05 AM, said:
I cooked it up myself, so you can call it the where-raise if you prefer
Hand evaulation is often a funny thing.
Here Whereagles is making a slam try of 4c with his partners and I am worried we could go down in 3S
#16
Posted 2005-July-23, 09:26
#17
Posted 2005-July-23, 10:08
beatrix45, on Jul 23 2005, 12:18 AM, said:
RHO is not up to anything, but is just being dumb. At least, that's what I suspect.
- hrothgar
#18
Posted 2005-July-25, 05:07
As you can see, 6♦ is unbeatable(!!).
At table the South player doubled, like most of us would. North wasn't too happy about it, but I don't think he's right. North was so thirsty for blood, hoping to capitalize on a mix-up of E/W, that he forgot to bid the hand properly. He could have bid 4S instead of doubling 4H, and he could have taken out the double to 5S, on account of his extra trump and good playing strenght.
#19
Posted 2005-July-25, 06:24
#20
Posted 2005-July-25, 06:30
well they had a mixe up, but got lucky landing on their feet,
I am not sure, it is right to assume RHO has a 6-6-1 shape,
so ... happens, move on.
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)

Help
