BBO Discussion Forums: What should i bid? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

What should i bid?

#21 User is offline   DavidKok 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,678
  • Joined: 2020-March-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 2025-April-24, 09:14

View PostCyberyeti, on 2025-April-24, 08:29, said:

I'm interested how much people think 1♣-1♥-X-3♥-3♠ shows both in terms of points and shape?
This is a classic auction for double Weasel. Just make sure to pause longer than mandatory if you wish to make a slow bid. Instead of 3♠, we have the options:
  • Fast double is takeout, showing both minors (alternatively you can interpret this as a thrump double).
  • Slow double is a game try double, showing approximately 15-17 points in playing strength and 4-card spade support.
  • Fast 3♠ is a maximum for a hand not worth a game try double, approximately 13-15 points.
  • Slow 3♠ is a minimum opening wishing to compete to 3♠. Obviously, partner has UI issues after this option (unless they have a genuine GF), so we put the weak hand here.
Stronger hands have to bid at the 4-level.

Being serious though: in competition we don't have enough bids to show all hands. I'm with Robson & Segal: hand type first. This also means 'strength later'. 3♠ is wide-ranging, and so is 4♠. If you play game try doubles here you can reduce the ranges a little bit - the direct 3♠ then shows approximately 11-14, X shows 14-16 and 4♠ shows 17+ (overlap intentional). Without them you just have to take your lumps: unbalanced hands weaker than a GF bid 3♠, stronger hands choose between 4♥ and 4♠. And before we praise game try doubles too much: if you are instead dealt, say, a 3=1=4=5 or 2=2=4=5 or 2=1=4=6 17-count you'll wish you did not play them here.
To me 3♠ shows an unbalanced hand. Thanks to the SNT I can either pass with the WNT or bid game with the stronger range. This helps partner make competitive decisions should they bid 4♥. Hopefully partner can keep the auction open if we have a WNT with 4-card support and competing further is good.
0

#22 User is online   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,364
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2025-April-24, 10:48

View PostDavidKok, on 2025-April-24, 09:14, said:

To me 3♠ shows an unbalanced hand. Thanks to the SNT I can either pass with the WNT or bid game with the stronger range. This helps partner make competitive decisions should they bid 4♥. Hopefully partner can keep the auction open if we have a WNT with 4-card support and competing further is good.


This is what I was getting at, never having played strong NT short club, I wasn't sure whether you were supposed to bid 3♠ with say AKxx, xx, xxx, AJxx
0

#23 User is offline   DavidKok 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,678
  • Joined: 2020-March-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 2025-April-24, 10:59

With that hand I think a lot of people would, but I'm not sure it is good to do so. The hand is so pure that even if we end up bidding 1-over-the-law we'll likely be fine. However, partner may raise us to game too aggressively.
By contrast, something like JTxx, Qxx, Ax, AKxx is a clear pass for me (assuming 1NT is 15-17), as is Qxxx, Ax, KQxx, Qxx (which I open 1♣).
0

#24 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,343
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2025-April-24, 11:06

View PostCyberyeti, on 2025-April-24, 10:48, said:

This is what I was getting at, never having played strong NT short club, I wasn't sure whether you were supposed to bid 3♠ with say AKxx, xx, xxx, AJxx


With that one I would ask do you want partner to bid 4s over your 3s bid with whatever your partnership would consider an invitational hand?
0

#25 User is online   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,364
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2025-April-24, 12:41

View Postmike777, on 2025-April-24, 11:06, said:

With that one I would ask do you want partner to bid 4s over your 3s bid with whatever your partnership would consider an invitational hand?


Depends if 3♠ is merely competitive and X is game try
0

#26 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,343
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2025-April-24, 13:04

View PostCyberyeti, on 2025-April-24, 12:41, said:

Depends if 3♠ is merely competitive and X is game try



You tell us, it is your specific hand example.

his is what I was getting at, never having played strong NT short club, I wasn't sure whether you were supposed to bid 3♠ with say AKxx, xx, xxx, AJxx

With that one I would ask do you want partner to bid 4s over your 3s bid with whatever your partnership would consider an invitational hand?
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users