BBO Discussion Forums: bidding under pressure - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

bidding under pressure

Poll: your call (37 member(s) have cast votes)

your call

  1. 3NT (3 votes [8.11%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.11%

  2. 4[DI] (32 votes [86.49%])

    Percentage of vote: 86.49%

  3. other (2 votes [5.41%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.41%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   Blofeld 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 775
  • Joined: 2005-May-05
  • Location:Oxford
  • Interests:mathematics, science fiction, Tolkien, go, fencing, word games, board games, bad puns, juggling, Mornington Crescent, philosophy, Tom Lehrer, rock climbing, jootsing, drinking tea, plotting to take over the world, croquet . . . and most other things, really.

  Posted 2005-June-13, 16:47

Scoring: MP

1 (3) 3 (P) ?
Playing Acol, and 3 is forcing.
Opponents intermediate ; LHO slightly aggressive, RHO more conservative.

I think I may have made a bad decision. What do people think of the 3NT and 4 bids?
0

#2 User is offline   inquiry 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 14,566
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amelia Island, FL
  • Interests:Bridge, what else?

Posted 2005-June-13, 16:53

3NT is a matchpoint kind of bid. Stopper? Who needs a stopper. In the long run, this might work out ok, but it is not for me. Pass, is of course, also eliminated. When you discard the obvious, whatever esle that is left, must be right. 4 - unimaginative, dull, but so be it....
--Ben--

#3 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,779
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2005-June-13, 16:56

4d

This means p is often forced to bid 3nt with 5 spades and a club stopper. Not easy.
0

#4 User is offline   luke warm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,951
  • Joined: 2003-September-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Bridge, poker, politics

Posted 2005-June-13, 16:58

i'm really not capable of figuring out how many times out of 100 a 3nt bid works.. it's appealing, but my hand looks better suited for suit play... guess i'll go 4 also
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)
0

#5 User is offline   Blofeld 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 775
  • Joined: 2005-May-05
  • Location:Oxford
  • Interests:mathematics, science fiction, Tolkien, go, fencing, word games, board games, bad puns, juggling, Mornington Crescent, philosophy, Tom Lehrer, rock climbing, jootsing, drinking tea, plotting to take over the world, croquet . . . and most other things, really.

Posted 2005-June-13, 17:00

mike: presumably with five spades and a club stopper partner could try a double, and then pull 3/3 to 3NT?
0

#6 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2005-June-13, 19:34

4D for me, I just bid my hand. Usually works well. Pard would be careful of endplaying me with a 3S bid anyways if his hand was more NT oriented.
0

#7 User is offline   Double ! 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,291
  • Joined: 2004-August-04
  • Location:Work in the South Bronx, NYC, USA
  • Interests:My personal interests are my family and my friends. I am extremely concerned about the lives and futures of the kids (and their families) that I work with. I care about the friends I have made on BBO. Also, I am extremely concerned about the environment/ ecology/ wildlife/ the little planet that we call Earth. How much more of the world's habitat and food supply for animals do we plan on destroying. How many more wetlands are we going to drain, fill, and build on? How many more sand dunes are we going to knock down in the interests of high-rise hotels or luxury homes?

Posted 2005-June-13, 21:53

A wise sage once said to me, "don't make unusual bids that partner can criticize."

Actually it was my older brother (an extremely good player) who also threatened to kick me butt at the time.
But, the idea of trying to not make a bid that is so inconsistent with your hand is a good guiding principle.
lololol, That was 30+ years ago. He's older but I'm bigger.
"That's my story, and I'm sticking to it!"
0

#8 User is offline   bearmum 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 757
  • Joined: 2003-July-06
  • Location:Perth Australia

Posted 2005-June-14, 01:10

Blofeld, on Jun 14 2005, 11:47 AM, said:

Dealer: South
Vul: N/S
Scoring: MP
7
KJT54
KQJ94
J4
  1 (3) 3 (P) ?
Playing Acol, and 3 is forcing.
Opponents intermediate ; LHO slightly aggressive, RHO more conservative.

I think I may have made a bad decision. What do people think of the 3NT and 4 bids?

4 because
1 U don't have even a partial stopper in so prefer not to bid 3NT
2 U don't have a rebiddable suit
3 U don't have support
4 U are NOT allowed to pass a forcing bid
;) :blink: :P B)
0

#9 User is offline   joker_gib 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,384
  • Joined: 2004-February-16
  • Location:Belgium

Posted 2005-June-14, 02:48

Jlall, on Jun 14 2005, 03:34 AM, said:

4D for me, I just bid my hand. Usually works well. Pard would be careful of endplaying me with a 3S bid anyways if his hand was more NT oriented.

4D and I agree with Justin !

If his hand is NT oriented, partner has to bid NT knowing there is no more room !

Alain
Alain
0

#10 User is online   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,889
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2005-June-14, 02:56

4D.

Hard, feels wrong, but I will follow ben, who cites Sherlock Holmes,
if you eliminate the impossible, whats left has to be the thing, even
if it is terrible.

With kind regards
Marlowe

PS: I would have liked to write "change system", but I rembered in time,
my partnership changed the system several weeks ago, making 3S forcing ;) ...
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#11 User is offline   Walddk 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,190
  • Joined: 2003-September-30
  • Location:London, England
  • Interests:Cricket

Posted 2005-June-14, 02:59

4, no other option. Bidding 3NT is gambling, and that's a completely different ballgame. I have hearts and diamonds, so when my partner forces me to bid again, I will show him my second suit.

If 3NT is the spot, responder should have thought a litle longer before he bid 3.

Roland
It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice
0

#12 User is offline   mr1303 

  • Admirer of Walter the Walrus
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,570
  • Joined: 2003-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • Interests:Bridge, surfing, water skiing, cricket, golf. Generally being outside really.

Posted 2005-June-14, 05:58

4D. People might well be hesitant to open 3C with a solid suit, but to overcall 3C people wouldn't have any problems with it at all. Hence the chances of them cashing the top 6/7 club tricks is a genuine danger.
0

#13 User is offline   Walddk 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,190
  • Joined: 2003-September-30
  • Location:London, England
  • Interests:Cricket

Posted 2005-June-14, 06:19

The problem would have been tougher with

72
AQT54
KQJ9
J4

Now I think it's better to bid 4 than 4. Not ideal with two small admittedly, but the best there is in my opinion.

Roland
It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice
0

#14 User is offline   Blofeld 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 775
  • Joined: 2005-May-05
  • Location:Oxford
  • Interests:mathematics, science fiction, Tolkien, go, fencing, word games, board games, bad puns, juggling, Mornington Crescent, philosophy, Tom Lehrer, rock climbing, jootsing, drinking tea, plotting to take over the world, croquet . . . and most other things, really.

  Posted 2005-June-14, 06:38

As I imagine most of you have guessed, I chanced a 3nt bid, which didn't work out very well.

On the actual hand, partner had:
KQJ943
A63
AT7
7
with which I maintained that he should have taken some action over 3nt (not that it excuses the 3nt bid). Is that reasonable?

For the record, LHO had AKTxxx and RHO had Qxxx (and the A).
0

#15 User is online   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,889
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2005-June-14, 06:44

Hi,

your partner should probably bid 4S over 3NT,
because his spades are not running.
To make 3NT you will need the spades, i.e. if
you have only one stopper in club and not the Ace
of spades, 3NT will probably go down, so yes he
should have bid 4S, but this is no excuse for
the 3NT.

Lead partner to a deep hole and be not surprised,
if he partner falls for it, and jumbs head over heels
into the hole.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#16 User is offline   JSilver 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 98
  • Joined: 2003-March-23
  • Location:San Francisco

Posted 2005-June-14, 12:35

I think you both took a position. I wouldn't bid 3NT with your hand, nor would I pass it with your partner's. There's no reason for him to think 3NT, even if it makes, will score more matchpoints than a contract. A slam is not out of the question if you have one of the black aces.
"Violence is the last resort of the incompetent." --Isaac Asimov
0

#17 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2005-June-14, 12:43

Blofeld, on Jun 14 2005, 07:38 AM, said:

As I imagine most of you have guessed, I chanced a 3nt bid, which didn't work out very well.

On the actual hand, partner had:
KQJ943
A63
AT7
7
with which I maintained that he should have taken some action over 3nt (not that it excuses the 3nt bid). Is that reasonable?

For the record, LHO had AKTxxx and RHO had Qxxx (and the A).

yes passing 3N is really absurd
0

#18 User is offline   Al_U_Card 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,080
  • Joined: 2005-May-16
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2005-June-14, 14:15

Quote

I maintained that he should have taken some action over 3nt

Quote

yes passing 3N is really absurd
Alert! Transfer (of fault). As far as pard knows, you have made the best bid you can so he respects your judgement..........poor deluded child.....lol. Better bids make better post-mortems at least.
The Grand Design, reflected in the face of Chaos...it's a fluke!
0

#19 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2005-June-14, 14:21

3N is not the final bid of the auction. It is (supposedly) a suggestion to play 3n, basically shows a stopper and no 3 card spade support. All you have shown on this hand so far is some minimal game force with 5+ spades.

you have KQJ9xx of spades, a suit playable opposite a stiff. You have Axx in support of partners major which you havent shown so a sure 8 card fit here. You have a stiff club and a very prime, suit oriented hand with definite slam interest. This is not a case of "respecting partners judgement." How can he make a judgement when you havent come close to describing your hand?
0

#20 User is offline   Al_U_Card 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,080
  • Joined: 2005-May-16
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2005-June-14, 14:46

Hey, no problem here, 3S shows an opening bid (since it is forcing that means at least 3NT) and pard can expect no C help so a 3NT bid would be void or stiff S with a DOUBLE stop in C. The sensible and accurate bid of 4D to show his actual hand always gets you to the H game, so ....why set a trap for pard when he is looking for help from you.....
The Grand Design, reflected in the face of Chaos...it's a fluke!
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users