I think I may have made a bad decision. What do people think of the 3NT and 4♦ bids?
bidding under pressure
#1
Posted 2005-June-13, 16:47
I think I may have made a bad decision. What do people think of the 3NT and 4♦ bids?
#2
Posted 2005-June-13, 16:53
#3
Posted 2005-June-13, 16:56
This means p is often forced to bid 3nt with 5 spades and a club stopper. Not easy.
#4
Posted 2005-June-13, 16:58
#5
Posted 2005-June-13, 17:00
#6 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2005-June-13, 19:34
#7
Posted 2005-June-13, 21:53
Actually it was my older brother (an extremely good player) who also threatened to kick me butt at the time.
But, the idea of trying to not make a bid that is so inconsistent with your hand is a good guiding principle.
lololol, That was 30+ years ago. He's older but I'm bigger.
#8
Posted 2005-June-14, 01:10
Blofeld, on Jun 14 2005, 11:47 AM, said:
|
| 1♥ (3♣) 3♠ (P) ? Playing Acol, and 3♠ is forcing. Opponents intermediate ; LHO slightly aggressive, RHO more conservative. |
I think I may have made a bad decision. What do people think of the 3NT and 4♦ bids?
4♦ because
1 U don't have even a partial stopper in ♣ so prefer not to bid 3NT
2 U don't have a rebiddable ♥ suit
3 U don't have ♠ support
4 U are NOT allowed to pass a forcing bid
#9
Posted 2005-June-14, 02:48
Jlall, on Jun 14 2005, 03:34 AM, said:
4D and I agree with Justin !
If his hand is NT oriented, partner has to bid NT knowing there is no more room !
Alain
#10
Posted 2005-June-14, 02:56
Hard, feels wrong, but I will follow ben, who cites Sherlock Holmes,
if you eliminate the impossible, whats left has to be the thing, even
if it is terrible.
With kind regards
Marlowe
PS: I would have liked to write "change system", but I rembered in time,
my partnership changed the system several weeks ago, making 3S forcing
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#11
Posted 2005-June-14, 02:59
If 3NT is the spot, responder should have thought a litle longer before he bid 3♠.
Roland
#12
Posted 2005-June-14, 05:58
#13
Posted 2005-June-14, 06:19
♠72
♥AQT54
♦KQJ9
♣J4
Now I think it's better to bid 4♠ than 4♦. Not ideal with two small admittedly, but the best there is in my opinion.
Roland
#14
Posted 2005-June-14, 06:38
On the actual hand, partner had:
♠KQJ943
♥A63
♦AT7
♣7
with which I maintained that he should have taken some action over 3nt (not that it excuses the 3nt bid). Is that reasonable?
For the record, LHO had ♣AKTxxx and RHO had ♣Qxxx (and the ♠A).
#15
Posted 2005-June-14, 06:44
your partner should probably bid 4S over 3NT,
because his spades are not running.
To make 3NT you will need the spades, i.e. if
you have only one stopper in club and not the Ace
of spades, 3NT will probably go down, so yes he
should have bid 4S, but this is no excuse for
the 3NT.
Lead partner to a deep hole and be not surprised,
if he partner falls for it, and jumbs head over heels
into the hole.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#16
Posted 2005-June-14, 12:35
#17 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2005-June-14, 12:43
Blofeld, on Jun 14 2005, 07:38 AM, said:
On the actual hand, partner had:
♠KQJ943
♥A63
♦AT7
♣7
with which I maintained that he should have taken some action over 3nt (not that it excuses the 3nt bid). Is that reasonable?
For the record, LHO had ♣AKTxxx and RHO had ♣Qxxx (and the ♠A).
yes passing 3N is really absurd
#18
Posted 2005-June-14, 14:15
Quote
Quote
#19 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2005-June-14, 14:21
you have KQJ9xx of spades, a suit playable opposite a stiff. You have Axx in support of partners major which you havent shown so a sure 8 card fit here. You have a stiff club and a very prime, suit oriented hand with definite slam interest. This is not a case of "respecting partners judgement." How can he make a judgement when you havent come close to describing your hand?
#20
Posted 2005-June-14, 14:46

Help

1♥ (3♣) 3♠ (P) ?
Playing Acol, and 3♠ is forcing.
Opponents intermediate ; LHO slightly aggressive, RHO more conservative.