You are playing Acol, but the bidding would be the same in SAYC or 2/1. What are your first two bids?
What's your style?
#1
Posted 2005-June-08, 17:22
You are playing Acol, but the bidding would be the same in SAYC or 2/1. What are your first two bids?
#2 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2005-June-08, 17:25
#3
Posted 2005-June-08, 17:33
#4
Posted 2005-June-08, 17:39
In 2/1 I suppose I have to bid 1♥, but then I think I'd try 2NT over 2♠ (wouldn't 3♣ be fourth suit forcing?)
#5
Posted 2005-June-08, 17:41
After 1♦ - 3♣; 3♠ I bid 3NT.
#6
Posted 2005-June-08, 18:08
Jlall, on Jun 8 2005, 06:25 PM, said:
Ditto
Yes 3c is 4th suit, so what, P also knows in 2/1 we may have real longer clubs in a weak hand and should bid with this in mind.
#8
Posted 2005-June-08, 20:52
http://cf71632485.spaces.live.com/blog/cns...!1015.entry
bridge blog002:
http://cvl7163cf2485...st-22291-1.html
#9
Posted 2005-June-09, 02:00
Fluffy, on Jun 8 2005, 07:22 PM, said:
2.- 3NT.
Same for me but 1NT is not an option !
Alain
#10
Posted 2005-June-09, 02:16
3NT, the right contract probably (2NT would show slam interest, but since the ♣ suit is burried you can't really check that out)
#12
Posted 2005-June-09, 04:00
Next bid: I'm not sure if 2NT would be forcing in Acol if my first bid was 2♣ (probably depends on the sort of Acol, I think it's forcing in modern Acol and non-forcing is classic Acol). Anyway, 3NT must be right.
#13
Posted 2005-June-09, 08:25
Free, on Jun 9 2005, 08:16 AM, said:
Basically because unless partner has 4♥ and less than 2♣ you will play better in ♣ than ♥. And if hand belongs to partscore the only way to play in ♣ is to start with 1NT. Remember this is IMPs!
#14
Posted 2005-June-09, 09:37

Help

(P) - 1♦ - (P) - ?
(P) - 2♠ - (P) - ?