When the opps play that a pass forces a XX on this sequence, I believe it is standard for
1N-X-P-2♦
to be weak, and
1N-X-P-P
XX-P-2♣-2♦
to be stronger. In that case, what does
1N-X-P-P
XX-P-P-2♦
show - two places to play perhaps?
Page 1 of 1
They are going to redouble 1N-X-P (forcing)
#2
Posted 2005-June-07, 05:01
Quoting from the Meckstroth book:
"LHO passes which is alerted as forcing opener to redouble and may include a wide range of hands. Our partnership style in these auctions when the opponents pass or redouble conventionally is that Eric's pass shows values and creates a force. He is expected to run immediately with a bad hand. (2♦/2♥/2♠ show at least a five-card suit and he bids 2♣ with either either clubs or no long suit, scramble style)."
And on the hand in question Rodwell passes and when the redouble gets back to him he bids 2♥ with ♠ 10xx ♥ 1098xx ♦ Qx ♣ xxx.
Was he just gambling that his RHO would take out? I don't know.
"LHO passes which is alerted as forcing opener to redouble and may include a wide range of hands. Our partnership style in these auctions when the opponents pass or redouble conventionally is that Eric's pass shows values and creates a force. He is expected to run immediately with a bad hand. (2♦/2♥/2♠ show at least a five-card suit and he bids 2♣ with either either clubs or no long suit, scramble style)."
And on the hand in question Rodwell passes and when the redouble gets back to him he bids 2♥ with ♠ 10xx ♥ 1098xx ♦ Qx ♣ xxx.
Was he just gambling that his RHO would take out? I don't know.
"Half the people you know are below average." - Steven Wright
#3
Posted 2005-June-07, 05:04
Generally the latter suggests a loss of bottle.....
The second sequence has never come up before, since I always run first on weak hands (even if pass doesn't force a redouble). And once I say that I'm happy to defend against 1N X I'm even more happy to defend against 1NT XX
The second sequence has never come up before, since I always run first on weak hands (even if pass doesn't force a redouble). And once I say that I'm happy to defend against 1N X I'm even more happy to defend against 1NT XX
#4
Posted 2005-June-07, 05:07
if my pard x'd the nt in #2, my 2d would say i think they're on for 1nt xx'd and i have 5+ diamonds, let's play this one and redeal
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)
#5
Posted 2005-June-07, 07:20
There are times where you will let them scape 1NT before you have to
.
Page 1 of 1

Help
