BBO Discussion Forums: Freakish hand - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Freakish hand

#21 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2005-June-01, 16:39

Indeed a fun hand.

I don't think I've ever bid a direct 5H over one of a minor but I have over 1S. There is no guarantee the opponents have a spade fit. Wouldn't you feel a bit stupid if pard had 6 or 7 spades of his own and enough soft cards in the minors that limits the hand to 4H and you could have bought it for that?

I do intend to take a 5H call over anything.

I don't know how to get pards help in a slam investigation here although perhaps a sensible approach would be to make a jump cue in diamonds and pull to 4H to perhaps this shows a solid suit and a slammish hand that wants to hear a cue bid.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#22 User is offline   luke warm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,951
  • Joined: 2003-September-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Bridge, poker, politics

Posted 2005-June-01, 16:45

Echognome, on Jun 1 2005, 04:29 PM, said:

Are we looking at the same auction? RHO opened 1♦. If partner blows you out of the water with a bid, that's the risk you take by passing. You don't compound it by making a bid that isn't part of your system. WTP? Any call you make carries a risk. I just think, let's have some fun with this. :lol:

arghh you're right.. helps to pay attention to the bidding

but i still think if you pass you might get burnt anytime they find a fit or partner bids
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)
0

#23 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2005-June-01, 16:46

getting pards help in slam investigation is a good idea except its impossible. How will pard know if he has AKxx xxx xx AKxx that is not enough, but xxxx xxxx x xxxx is perfect? This is not a deal where we enlist partners help. Granted with that being said who knows what the right bid is, anything and everything could work.

BTW don't most experts play 1D-3D as natural?
0

#24 User is offline   Winstonm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,289
  • Joined: 2005-January-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tulsa, Oklahoma
  • Interests:Art, music

Posted 2005-June-01, 18:27

Of course, I bid 2D, Michael's, on the way to 7H doubled when partner won't believe my repeated heart bids thereafter and keeps on raising spades.

In real life, I believe there are two "correct" options: 1) pass and listen to the bidding for a while, and 2) bid 5 hearts right now. Both are extreme actions, but this is an extreme hand.

WinstonM
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."
0

#25 User is offline   luis 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,143
  • Joined: 2003-May-02
  • Location:Buenos Aires, Argentina

Posted 2005-June-01, 20:24

I don't really find 5♥ so appealing, if you can make only 4♥ bidding 5 is quite silly, if you can make 6♥ bidding 5 is not brilliant either since pd won't know if he has to bid 6 or not. So I only like 4♥ and 6♥ in this auction.
Passing is silly, you will get them to exchange information and know what to do better, if you directly bid 4 or 6 hearts they have to guess whats going on inmediately.

As some of you said, who knows, anything can be right but I think 5♥ is a road to nowhere.
The legend of the black octogon.
0

#26 User is offline   Rebound 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 518
  • Joined: 2004-July-25

Posted 2005-June-01, 21:39

Just my 2 cents: I think on hands like this it is a good idea to decide the level right away as with any pre-empt and just bid it then keep silent thereafter. I'd go for 5♥.
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy - but it might improve my bridge.
0

#27 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2005-June-02, 03:40

Full hands here

♠ AKT9xxx
♥ --
♦ --
♣ AQJxxx

♠ --
♥ AKQ98xxxx
♦ JT97
♣ --

At table South tried a gambling 3NT overcall, after which there was no stopping North blasting to 6♠. Final contract was 7♥ X, which was on the verge to make, given the lead was.. a spade!!! 1 down.

The lesson of the hand is simple and recurrent. I've seen a couple of hands like this: a long suit and lenght in opponent's suit. What usually happens is pard has a monster 2-suiter in the unbid suits and can't keep quiet.

The trick with hands like this is how to convince pard to stop below the 5 or 6-level. Pass is not good because pard is definitely going to overcall some suit we can't support. A shot at 5 or 6♥ does keep pard quiet, but is probably too high because neither we nor opps can make a thing. A 4♥ overcall might do the trick, but if pard 'tries' for something we're in trouble. That leaves a simple 2 or 3♥ overcall, rebidding hearts at all occasions. Perhaps pard can understand this. Maybe it goes

(1♦)
2♥ 2♠ (enthousiastic)
3♥ 4♣ (still confident)
4♥ ...? (what is he talking about?? Oh well, I pass)

Just made ;)
0

#28 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2005-June-02, 07:44

I don't think because i have the ever so frequent 9-4 pard must have 7-6. But thats me. Who dealt this hand???????
0

#29 User is offline   Echognome 

  • Deipnosophist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,386
  • Joined: 2005-March-22

Posted 2005-June-02, 07:50

Not to mention that partner has just about every missing high card point in the deck.

By the way, pass might work out after all. As long as you are disciplined and continue to pass when partner bids each of your voids. Not saying it's best, but on the hand given could work.
"Half the people you know are below average." - Steven Wright
0

#30 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2005-June-02, 08:05

I am not disciplined then, I don't think I could ever pass throughout with 9-4 including 9 solid ;)... Maybe if they opened 7N
0

#31 User is offline   Al_U_Card 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,080
  • Joined: 2005-May-16
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2005-June-02, 08:09

Start with 1 H and at your next turn bid 5D, Pard will know what to do.
The Grand Design, reflected in the face of Chaos...it's a fluke!
0

#32 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2005-June-02, 08:31

Jlall, on Jun 2 2005, 01:44 PM, said:

Who dealt this hand???????

Was dealt at table.

From what I could tell, it was a legitimate shuffle.
0

#33 User is offline   Blofeld 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 775
  • Joined: 2005-May-05
  • Location:Oxford
  • Interests:mathematics, science fiction, Tolkien, go, fencing, word games, board games, bad puns, juggling, Mornington Crescent, philosophy, Tom Lehrer, rock climbing, jootsing, drinking tea, plotting to take over the world, croquet . . . and most other things, really.

  Posted 2005-June-02, 08:34

Could you let us know how partner will know what to do after you bid 1♥ and 5♦?
0

#34 User is offline   Echognome 

  • Deipnosophist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,386
  • Joined: 2005-March-22

Posted 2005-June-02, 08:40

(1♦) - 1♥ - (P) - 1/2/3/4♠
(P) - 5♦ - (P) - ?

Isn't this obviously a long heart suit and nothing else?

:)
"Half the people you know are below average." - Steven Wright
0

#35 User is offline   Al_U_Card 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,080
  • Joined: 2005-May-16
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2005-June-02, 09:00

Blofeld, on Jun 2 2005, 09:34 AM, said:

Could you let us know how partner will know what to do after you bid 1♥ and 5♦?

Certainly. On freak hands, everyone will have something to say (show). The key is to describe your hand as accurately as possible. Despite the actual hand (result) pard will know that you have solid H and at least 2 quick losers in D. (Therefore, no support for any suit he might (have) offer(ed).) I'm sure that a good pard, given accurate information about your hand, will be able to make an informed and correct decision.
The Grand Design, reflected in the face of Chaos...it's a fluke!
0

#36 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2005-June-02, 09:08

Well, perhaps one should define an overcall of 4♦ as "I have a freak hand", as in..

1♠ 4♦ = "A freak. guess my suit(s)"
0

#37 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2005-June-02, 09:08

whereagles, on Jun 2 2005, 09:31 AM, said:

Jlall, on Jun 2 2005, 01:44 PM, said:

Who dealt this hand???????

Was dealt at table.

From what I could tell, it was a legitimate shuffle.

lol wow I believe it since probability wise one of these hands WILL get dealt, but still amazing.

BTW I agree that describing your hand to partner is good, but with 9-4 it is impossible to describe accurately. This is not the type of hand for science.
0

#38 User is offline   HeartA 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,016
  • Joined: 2004-October-17

Posted 2005-June-02, 09:33

I would not that master-minded and just bid 4H.
Senshu
0

#39 User is offline   Al_U_Card 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,080
  • Joined: 2005-May-16
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2005-June-02, 09:38

HeartA, on Jun 2 2005, 10:33 AM, said:

I would not that master-minded and just bid 4H.

I believe that to "master-mind" means to act unilaterally (excluding pard from the bidding). 4 H (right or wrong) certainly qualifies and I would think better describes a hand like 1-8-2-2 etc. so pard will have a TOTAL description of your (lack of)values.
The Grand Design, reflected in the face of Chaos...it's a fluke!
0

#40 User is offline   luke warm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,951
  • Joined: 2003-September-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Bridge, poker, politics

Posted 2005-June-02, 10:26

i don't think i'd use 'mastermind' about someone who had a solid 9 card suit
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)
0

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users